clontarfkid
Well-known member
Youre indeed gonna need to slow THAT line of comment down a bit for me tbh!.If Madden was better than a backup 7, He'd have been mentioned in the merri-go round of basically all the back up halves between the clubs of late.
What's your argument?
Because one minute he's a better player - now he's a cheaper player...
and we can spend the money elsewhere.
That's obviously true in the fact he's cheaper... But it's also true for basically every starting player in the team. - We could save money on that position and improve another by spending more...
- We don't have superstars any more....
Weather the money can be better spent - Where - On Who - Will they come for money? Nothing more than a circular point / argument
My point was simple - Or so I thought...
There's no one (In the comp) that thinks Madden is a better player than Brooks....
You don't need to keep it simple.... I'm happy to slow up for you a bit if you need?
The real issue weve got >$2mill invested in 3 highly paid halves in Hastings Douhi and Brooks...thats one too many when we have so many holes elsewhere in our lineup
Nobody EVER said Madden is a better player than Brooks TODAY...thats ridiculous conflation..Madden has done nothing except demonstrate potential,and he;ll undoubtedly get his chances this year as a backup.
Mind you,he wont have to do a lot to surpass Brooks contributions to out attack in recent years
Of course we can spend Brooks $700k effectively ..that sort $$ of mite buy a classy centre or mite have kept Lucy.or .mite buy Thompson...who knows.The market for players is always evolving