Brooks Bashers Bore Me

Status
Not open for further replies.
are people really suggesting we run out with a Madden Peachy halves combo? I think Brooks and the club should part ways for everyone’s sake but that combo is worse. Brooks is here for the year and will be the 7 for most of it
If any of the better halfbacks in the league would come here, I’d pack Brooks’s bags. They won’t.
 
If any of the better halfbacks in the league would come here, I’d pack Brooks’s bags. They won’t.
I read a comment before the game where someone said if we let Brooks go, it will be smooth sailing. Wasn’t sarcasm either.
 
so the kick for Laurie dropped
and
the kick for Luciano "try" doesn't count
Brooks played well tonight fair dinkum
When it came to the crunch he folded (again)
2 good kicks in 32 games doesn’t cut it ..
Madden was better
Madden $200k (probably less) 5 games
Brooks $850k 175 games lol
You do the maths
 
I challenge this Forum to give the Brooks bashing a rest. It’s boring and monotonous. We get it. Yep, it’s frustrating he hasn’t become the player we hoped he would be, but the constant bleating is such a bore. I challenge the Forum to go a week without whinging about Brooks!!!!
Cheffo you do realise that you've created another Brooks topic, there's been a few mate, what you done is put a can of petrol in the brook haters hands and say 'don't throw it in the fire'
Your only hope now is that they do it and blow up 💥
 
When it came to the crunch he folded (again)
2 good kicks in 32 games doesn’t cut it ..
Madden was better
Madden $200k (probably less) 5 games
Brooks $850k 175 games lol
You do the maths
Was more than 2 kicks. He also put both centres into the clear either side of half time. Madden was ok, and showed a bit of potential, but he wasn’t anything to write home about. And it’s obvious he’s only being talked up to diminish Brooks even further. But it’s not going to work because Brooks was fine tonight and far from our biggest problem.
 
Was more than 2 kicks. He also put both centres into the clear either side of half time. Madden was ok, and showed a bit of potential, but he wasn’t anything to write home about. And it’s obvious he’s only being talked up to diminish Brooks even further. But it’s not going to work because Brooks was fine tonight and far from our biggest problem.
Fine 😂
We were camped in the warriors 20 against 12 men for 10 mins
And our former dally m winner and highest paid chief playmaker did Jack shit
You think his wage is deserving ?
Didn’t think so !
 
Fine 😂
We were camped in the warriors 20 against 12 men for 10 mins
And our former dally m winner and highest paid chief playmaker did Jack shit
You think his wage is deserving ?
Didn’t think so !
Im not talking up as an immortal, but he’s not the abomination you claim either. If he and Madden swapped roles tonight and Brooks played the way Madden did, you still would say he sucked.
 
Im not talking up as an immortal, but he’s not the abomination you claim either. If he and Madden swapped roles tonight and Brooks played the way Madden did, you still would say he sucked.
I liked it when Noffa tripped over his own feet and then dropped the ball. And also when Laurie dribbled the ball like it was a basketball over the try line 😂 yeah it’s the halfback 😂
 
Im not talking up as an immortal, but he’s not the abomination you claim either. If he and Madden swapped roles tonight and Brooks played the way Madden did, you still would say he sucked.
He doesn’t even touch the ball in some entire sets
He’s an abortion of a player
Even his defence is starting to wain .
Praying when his kid pops he’ll be a stay at home dad
 
Cheffo you do realise that you've created another Brooks topic, there's been a few mate, what you done is put a can of petrol in the brook haters hands and say 'don't throw it in the fire'
Your only hope now is that they do it and blow up 💥
Cheffo obviously hates Brooks and has set this platform up for more abuse.
Well played 👏🏻
 
So the guys has 20 Carry’s into the defence. 7 more than Stefano. 11 more than Tamou and Lucy 5 more than Joffa.
And chalks up 145m again.
His obviously not doing enough at Halfback. Needs to be named at prop so he can start getting some credit for his work.
People aren’t watching the game. He had it by the scruff of the neck and then it was Musgrove knock on, crusher, noffa knock on, Musgrove high shot. We didn’t see the ball for 10 mins. Momentum gone.
 
People aren’t watching the game. He had it by the scruff of the neck and then it was Musgrove knock on, crusher, noffa knock on, Musgrove high shot. We didn’t see the ball for 10 mins. Momentum gone.
People are starting to watch the games, just to see whether or not Brooks plays like an Immortal.
Obviously if he doesn’t, he is poor and isn’t worth the shirt on his back.
Madden I thought started well with a lot of confidence. But didn’t get involved anywhere near as much in the second half.
Well it’s certainly going to be a challenge next week against the Titans pack without our leading prop in Stefano.
 
He doesn’t even touch the ball in some entire sets
He’s an abortion of a player
Even his defence is starting to wain .
Praying when his kid pops he’ll be a stay at home dad
Brooks received the ball 60 times and Tigers completed 33 sets. So what are you talking about?

The wildly differing opinions about Brooks is caused by confirmation bias. Also I think that there is a certain type of person that feels better when they rant and blame someone, it doesn't have to be true, but they feel better.

You hobbo1, only see what you want to see. If Brooks was as bad as you think he is, why has he played 174 first grade games? Why do other teams want to buy him (now and in the past)? Why does he get paid an unknown but very large amount of money?

The choices are:-
1. hobbo1 knows far more than all the people that run and coach NRL clubs
2. hobbo1 is wrong about Brooks, and does not see reality when he/she watches a game.

I'm pretty sure its number 2.
 
Brooks received the ball 60 times and Tigers completed 33 sets. So what are you talking about?

The wildly differing opinions about Brooks is caused by confirmation bias. Also I think that there is a certain type of person that feels better when they rant and blame someone, it doesn't have to be true, but they feel better.

You hobbo1, only see what you want to see. If Brooks was as bad as you think he is, why has he played 174 first grade games? Why do other teams want to buy him (now and in the past)? Why does he get paid an unknown but very large amount of money?

The choices are:-
1. hobbo1 knows far more than all the people that run and coach NRL clubs
2. hobbo1 is wrong about Brooks, and does not see reality when he/she watches a game.

I'm pretty sure its number 2.
Why? Because you say so?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top