Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Sadly, Im thinking the same.Put your house on the Dogs this weekend.
Thing is Gould does what it takes to (a) win, and (b) protect his reputation.I have lost all respect for Phil Gould.
To big for his boots.
I would not. Rubbish teams are rubbish for a reason. Definitely a 50/50 prospect for both teams and I'd be shocked if the betting agencies saw it any other way.Sadly, Im thinking the same.
Totally agree.Thing is Gould does what it takes to (a) win, and (b) protect his reputation.
The major difference to most NRL people is Gould is good at both (a) and (b); you cannot deny he knows what he's talking about and he has the reputation and ability to back his mouth up.
So actually I don't agree Gould is "too big for his boots" - I think both his boots and his metaphorical feet are huge, and he knows it. The true question is whether or not you want to get into bed with a guy like that, who will lie and lobby and backstab like the best mafioso or politician.
You have to give Gould some credit - he could have stayed in his commentary role and just delivered his usual sermons every week. But he decided to get his hands dirty again, and not with cushy roles, with embattled clubs (at the time) - Penrith, Warriors, Bulldogs. His reputation has definitely suffered, and he has introduced easy lines of criticism from his old foes, for the fence he tries to saddle between club administrator and media pundit.
It's very easy to dislike Phil Gould but I would argue it's difficult not to have a lot of respect for what he is capable of as a rugby league personality. If Phil Gould was director at the Tigers, we'd probably all be lauding him and clinging dearly to the possibility that he'd turn everything around for us (already happening with the renewed cult of Tim Sheens).
That article is doing the rounds.I heard from a few places that they think Madge would be a good man to lead a long term rebuild for the dogs.
Its slim pickings out there in terms of established coaches
Don't know about that a lot of players in their side that don't have a future at the clubSadly, Im thinking the same.
Nothing in league is truly simple.Totally agree.
Man I'd love it if we could word count your posts.
You must have written millions of words on this forum over the years.
You'd have to have the record.
Not being sarcastic, just in awe.
When mathematicians invent a "percentage chance" less than zero, that is what will apply to this mooted coach swap. Absolute lunacy. Someone at Fox is off their meds.
Yeah that article is absolutely nonsense. I've seen a few articles too.Our coach and team are now performing as good as they can be with what we have.
This article by fox league is not an opinion or advice with good intentions from these Hypocrites.
It is another abusive marketing ploy designed to get the job for their friend Flanagan.
Lee H. is a successful and a well respected lawyer and he must now put an end to all this abuse that the WT have been receiving for the past many years.
Really pathetic journalism.When mathematicians invent a "percentage chance" less than zero, that is what will apply to this mooted coach swap. Absolute lunacy. Someone at Fox is off their meds.
Isn't he the chairman?Arthur Laundy asking for a please explain from the Doggies been good mates with Barrett for twenty years wait for the shite to hit the fan pass the pop corn please
Major Sponsor multiple hotel ownerIsn't he the chairman?
Can't ignore the timing. Gus knows this is a must win game for them too and is more than achievable. Barrett was gone as soon as the final whistle blew. Like to bet Barrett knew it and so did Gould
Owns the Oxford Hotel, fair few othersMajor Sponsor multiple hotel owner
Yeah I know who he is. I thought he was also the chairman or on the board aswell. It appears not.Major Sponsor multiple hotel owner
JOHN KHOURY is the chairmanYeah I know who he is. I thought he was also the chairman or on the board aswell. It appears not.