Brooks won't be at the club.round 1
1. Staines
4. Douhie
6. Laurie
7. Brooks
9. Api
13. Hastings
The sooner you come to terms with this the better.
š¤
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brooks won't be at the club.round 1
1. Staines
4. Douhie
6. Laurie
7. Brooks
9. Api
13. Hastings
2024 maybe but no reason to release him 2023Brooks won't be at the club.
The sooner you come to terms with this the better.
š¤
Plenty of reason to release him.2024 maybe buy no reason to release him 2023
Don't think Laurie will be the 7 in any case surely
bit harsh we will see what Sheens wants to do I guessPlenty of reason to release him.
The main one being...
He's not a good player.
Based on years of evidence.bit harsh we will see what Sheens wants to do I guess
if we do not have what Sheens deems a better replacement for 2023 at 7 then I don't think he will let him go to strengthen another squad.Based on years of evidence.
2018 half-back nonsense aside.
Sheens might not have a choice in the matter.
How is it going to look when an employer denies an employees request two years in a row?
Unfair and unreasonable to force some one to stay in a job against their will...
Y'all thought the Moses break down was bad.... can't wait to see how the media paints this narrative.
IF Brooks wants out, which is how it g
does appear.... he will get his wish.
Sheens has coached Hastings in one match. Funny how he played in the halves if Sheens considered him to be a 13 only.
Exercise common sense.if we do not have what Sheens deems a better replacement for 2023 at 7 then I don't think he will let him go to strengthen another squad.
Has he really asked for a release 3 times, the nrl360 crowd says he has that doesn't mean much ...
If Sheens doesn't see Hastings as a 7 he won't play him there
I don't think he bough Staines so Laurie could play 7 either, rumour were weeks ago Laurie would be given a go at 6
we don't have a centre he k own Douhie can play there and has done so that ticks a spot for 2023
2024 completely different story he goes to Newcastle and by then we sign a 7
2024 maybe but no reason to release him 2023
Don't think Laurie will be the 7 in any case surely
Yep, 2 x 5/8s and a ball playing lockIād say itāll be 6. Laurie - left side 7. Douhei - preferred right side 13. Hastings control the middle
It's Souffs - you spelt Souffs wrong. Take yer false teeff out and vat's Souffs.I've come to the conclusion that this forum is split down the middle.
Group A. Quite highbrow for a league forum, they post well thought out and constructive thoughts.
Group B. Toothless, illiterate halfwits, the type you'd assume were Souths fans.
Sheens Might even give Laurie a roaming licenseIād say itāll be 6. Laurie - left side 7. Douhei - preferred right side 13. Hastings control the middle
Remember our last decent 7 ?Sheens Might even give Laurie a roaming license
I donāt mind old heads but ones that can still make post contact meters or at least offload the ball to promote second phase footy.Joe Ofahengaue (27), Alex Twal (26), Isaiah Papaliāi (24), Alex Seyfarth (23) the oldest forwards at WT as it stands for 2023.
Our team is barely old enough to go on the rides at Luna Park.
We sure need some old heads.
Would enjoy seeing Laurie x Douhei play off a good forward pack in Klemmer, Stef, offa and poleRemember our last decent 7 ?
Robert Lui....
He wasn't overly fast either.
Just controlled the game and iced some kicks.
Allowed Benji to create with flashiness from 6
That'll be 7 AD x 6 DL
Makes too much sense.
AD at 7 ... don't think soExercise common sense.
Even if you don't believe the reports of this being the third time Brooks has asked for a release - where there is smoke, there is fire.
Pom has alluded to this information being factual so if you trust his sources, it's there for the taking.
Yeah, Sheens is a fan of him and wants to work with him.... but all signs are pointing to the feeling isn't mutual.
Adam plays 7, Laurie plays 6.
Hastings stays at 13.
See ya Brooks.
Problem solved.