CloudyGlock
Well-known member
Im hoping john Paul put that video together
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IncorrectAll three gone
Tigers are Klemmers preference however Knights will not release him without Brooks. Tigers are prepared to pay full freight for Klemmer 2023.Second hand (and about a week old) info so perhaps should not be taken as fact.
Klemmer release independent of Brooks. Klemmer assessing other offers and his preference is another Sydney club who are offering similar money as Tigers are for 24 and 25. They however at this stage will not pay full freight for Klemmer for 23 whereas Tigers will. Knights will not grant Klemmer release unless new club takes the whole of the contract.
Negotiations on going but the likely outcome will be Klemmer will see out his contract at Newcastle before moving on at the end of 23.
2nd most likely will be other club moves on a player and ups their offer for 23 to secure Klemmer.
And least likely Klemmer is here in 23.
Not sure you understand TPA's mateThis is one of the big reasons not to sign Woods.
1. It's a waste of a contract spot.
2. Some rich dude is prepared to chuck in money to get Woods. This money should be used to get a much better player. This is the 3rd party contract.
The roosters use it on Cronk. We use it on Woods.
I have to ask , is that your feeling of what you hope is the case, or do you have actual, reliable feedback of that fact ?
Ok thanks.Just personal observation. I’m not saying it excuses his actions but I get the feeling he regrets how it happened.
Puh-lease!The Wests Tigers can have no control over it otherwise its not a TPA.
Do you see Knights just letting Klemmer go even if we keep Brooks mate?Tigers are Klemmers preference however Knights will not release him without Brooks. Tigers are prepared to pay full freight for Klemmer 2023.
Just to add for those unaware, TPAs are outside the salary cap as they are negotiated between a third party (eg sponsor/supporter) and the player.The Wests Tigers can have no control over it otherwise its not a TPA.
I've heard Klemmer's agent has spoken to Manly, Roosters, Parra, Dolphins and WT. He's in high demand, it's not cut and dried. He's building a new house on the water at Lake Maquarie so I don't think he's going north. That leaves 4. WT are offering most though, like you said, full freight. That sounds to me like we are very, very interested.Tigers are Klemmers preference however Knights will not release him without Brooks. Tigers are prepared to pay full freight for Klemmer 2023.
How so…
I’ve watched him since ball - I’ve never seen him to be dishonest,
Lot of butt hurt because a kid went and got himself a good deal at a good club,
The Wests Tigers can have no control over it otherwise its not a TPA.