Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Good players want to play with good players. We increase the quality of the players in our team - Klemmer, Koroiseau, Papali'i', Bateman, Staines - we get better results. Win win.
Maybe so … but why want Brooks for 3 years?
I know he’s his mate but that’s just pity.
 
If there is the slightest bit of truth to what you say moses should have been told that he is a "player not an owner of the club" and immediately been told that he has no say in who plays for the club

Brooks is one of his best mates. Moses was never going to come here at the expense of a mate, it was always only a possibility if it meant they played together. That has been well lnown since all this saga started. So I think he is entitled to make sure his mate wasn't getting shafted for him.
 
If there is the slightest bit of truth to what you say moses should have been told that he is a "player not an owner of the club" and immediately been told that he has no say in who plays for the club

Harsh in some ways. Can hardly fault him for it.

Moses is a marquee player, he would want to know who he is planned to play with for the next few years as that is part of the sell to the marquee player.

Brooks no doubt would be the maim draw card for him, they are besties, played alot in juniors together, lived together for years, have kids weeks apart, they still talk about playing together again and still live around the block from each other. I can’t fault him for asking it if he has a clear preference to play next to him. We don’t need to say yes though.

At Parra he also knows the combinations - it’s who we are competing against - Gutho, Brown, Hodgo.

For us it’s currently?, ?, Moses & Api if he came.

It would be an important factor to know who is going to be the key players attack wise.
 
If there is the slightest bit of truth to what you say moses should have been told that he is a "player not an owner of the club" and immediately been told that he has no say in who plays for the club
why is that ? at Parramatta he knows Brown will be the 6, he just wants to know who his 6 will be.
Doesn't mean the club has to re-sign anyone but if they dint then it probably makes the decision easy for Moses, he stays an eel
 
Harsh in some ways. Can hardly fault him for it.

Moses is a marquee player, he would want to know who he is planned to play with for the next few years as that is part of the sell to the marquee player.

Brooks no doubt would be the maim draw card for him, they are besties, played alot in juniors together, lived together for years, have kids weeks apart, they still talk about playing together again and still live around the block from each other. I can’t fault him for asking it if he has a clear preference to play next to him. We don’t need to say yes though.

At Parra he also knows the combinations - it’s who we are competing against - Gutho, Brown, Hodgo.

For us it’s currently?, ?, Moses & Api if he came.

It would be an important factor to know who is going to be the key players attack wise.
Good post.
 
Harsh in some ways. Can hardly fault him for it.

Moses is a marquee player, he would want to know who he is planned to play with for the next few years as that is part of the sell to the marquee player.

Brooks no doubt would be the maim draw card for him, they are besties, played alot in juniors together, lived together for years, have kids weeks apart, they still talk about playing together again and still live around the block from each other. I can’t fault him for asking it if he has a clear preference to play next to him. We don’t need to say yes though.

At Parra he also knows the combinations - it’s who we are competing against - Gutho, Brown, Hodgo.

For us it’s currently?, ?, Moses & Api if he came.

It would be an important factor to know who is going to be the key players attack wise.
if it was AD he was wanting to play with plenty on here wouldn't have an issue lol
But because it is Brooks ...
 
Brooks is one of his best mates. Moses was never going to come here at the expense of a mate, it was always only a possibility if it meant they played together. That has been well lnown since all this saga started. So I think he is entitled to make sure his mate wasn't getting shafted for him.
plus good mates and same manager too. I'd say Isaac would be wanting to get Moses sorted and an extension of some kind for brooks too. Issue will come down to price tigers are willing to part with for brooks I guess
 
Didn't you claim another poster was like a broken record the other day? Think you need a little self reflection if you start throwing claims like that at others.
Can’t recall doing so … well, not in those words.
Unless you’re talking about Brooks being a Dally M Halfback of the Year 🤣
Anyways just stating the truth… even in reflection.
 
call BS on that if he said he wanted AD plenty on here would not have an issue...
Players like to k ow who they are going to play with all the time nothing new

I can't talk for other posters on here only myself. I have an issue with the principle of any player managing recruitment and retention for the Tigers. I have massive issues with a potential recruit doing that.

I'm assuming it's not true because it means Sheens and his staff are incompetent and unprofessional.
 
if it was AD he was wanting to play with plenty on here wouldn't have an issue lol
But because it is Brooks ...

Respectfully, tigeraps mail isn't good.
Highly doubt he knows about such a
specific contract stipulation given
the fact there has been a freeze on
everything related to Moses since Xmas
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top