Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

Lets be real they aren’t at Joffa level and only James plays the same position.

If Klem or Stef goes down not one of those mentioned can cover the gap to Joffa level.
Klem and Twal both play big mins. Stef is developing, and Pole is coming on fast too and can play big mins.

Then the next replacement in the prop rotation is Blore. After a lean few years without much action just playing every week in NSW Cup has allowed him to find some form. He's been playing as a prop for the past few years, regardless of what number is on his back. He was running hard and fast last weekend, scored a powerful try.
And then Seyfarth, James or even give Fainu/Tuki a run off the bench if we're desperate and see what they come up with. We're not making the finals anyway
We need backs and halves, the 600k cash can be better used elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
I really like Joffa. When we were a terrible team the last couple of years, he was always leading the defensive line, trying to meet ball runners, always putting his hand up for another carry.

However, the Tigers forwards are vastly improved this year. This means Joffa isn't AS important as he was before. Doesn't make him worse, just not as prominent. And because of that, he's somewhat expendable. I don't think anyone can accuse him of not having a dig. If he has a chance to play more at Parra- good for him- good luck.

Seyfarth, Blore, Kepoua, Matamua & James are going to be relied upon to fill that roll at a more budget friendly cost, while additionally developing their game.

If the contract numbers are close to correct, moving on a bench player at that cost makes perfect sense.
 
Maybe/ hopefully they do.
I have been encouraged that there has been a lot less info in the media about the Tigers from Club insiders.

The only leaks are those by managers agitating for their client.

For the first time in ages I feel confident that the Tigers Leadership will secure a beneficial outcome IF Joffa is allowed to leave.
 
I have been encouraged that there has been a lot less info in the media about the Tigers from Club insiders.

The only leaks are those by managers agitating for their client.

For the first time in ages I feel confident that the Tigers Leadership will secure a beneficial outcome IF Joffa is allowed to leave.
🙏
 
I really like Joffa. When we were a terrible team the last couple of years, he was always leading the defensive line, trying to meet ball runners, always putting his hand up for another carry.

However, the Tigers forwards are vastly improved this year. This means Joffa isn't AS important as he was before. Doesn't make him worse, just not as prominent. And because of that, he's somewhat expendable. I don't think anyone can accuse him of not having a dig. If he has a chance to play more at Parra- good for him- good luck.

Seyfarth , Blore, Kepoua, Matamua & James are going to be relied upon to fill that roll at a more budget friendly cost, while additionally developing their game.

If the contract numbers are close to correct, moving on a bench player at that cost makes perfect sense.
Seyfarth?? the less we see him in the team the better, much better option would be Furner, he could play short stint, and would certainly make more post tackle meters and provide more off loads !
 
Could we be playing our new target #7 tomorrow?

Perhaps Joffa to NQ as part of an arrangement there as Tamou, McLean are coming towards the end up there.
 
I’m also thinking Schuster may now be courted more than ever. If he is told he is our backline voice & leader, Brooks as non dominant half, Bula to run off him etc, it may just help bring out the best in him.
 
Shaun Johnson says "no thanks". Do we move on to Hunt?
Reported by Michael Carayannis
This will generate some more negative Tigers articles. Annoys me the bias against us (yes I know we are our own worst enemy with track record). Example being the “desperation” article about wanting to sign Johnson for 2 years at $650K/season but it’s a “perfect fit” for Bulldogs to sign Hunt for probably $1.2M-ish a season. Similar age and Johnson definitely a lot better than half as good as Hunt. Just so biased in the anti Tigers articles.
 
This will generate some more negative Tigers articles. Annoys me the bias against us (yes I know we are our own worst enemy with track record). Example being the “desperation” article about wanting to sign Johnson for 2 years at $650K/season but it’s a “perfect fit” for Bulldogs to sign Hunt for probably $1.2M-ish a season. Similar age and Johnson definitely a lot better than half as good as Hunt. Just so biased in the anti Tigers articles.
How the hell do the dogs fit him in under there cap
 
  • Like
Reactions: 851
If SJ and Pearce said no with no other options on the table, Hunt is no chance. No half wants to go near the place.

We really are in deep trouble finding a half for next year, which I think is why the club have opened negotiations with Brooks.
 

Members online

Back
Top