Kelce68
Well-known member
"Jack Cogger has already shown more upside than Luke Brooks"
- Is that your contention RLC?
I know Brooksy has his (many at times) downsides but goodness me.....
Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion
- Thread starter MacDougall
- Start date
- Is that your contention RLC?
I know Brooksy has his (many at times) downsides but goodness me.....
The Pumpkin Pickers won last year. Brock Lamb starred for them
I'm a Brooks detractor but I can't even back that up
I think Cogger has shown more than Wakeham though
Be very careful what you say as it will upset the "All is wonderful" brigade.We have got worse this year when you compare "quality of roster" to "results achieved",this is the best squad we have had in a decade and getting arguably the most disappointing and pathetic results.
WesternSuburbsBoy
Well-known member
Because Pascoe & Lee are power hungry egotistical clowns.
bathursttiger1
Well-known member
Come on we need clickbait otherwise Buzz would be out of a job, then where do we get the humour from.
Yes. Alamoti has "come back to the field" somewhat in recent weeks.
Is still only 19.
Bula didn't even debut until 21.
I think he'll be a real star in a few years time.
Why not take both 🤔
Robbie's Love Child
Well-known member
Hate to tell you this champ but it won't happen. He should go to the Super League where you can be dogshit and excel, he is poo and has proven it consistently now for nearly a decade. Face the facts, he has no one to blame but himself.
Jedi_Tiger
Well-known member
People shouldn’t hate on brooks.
He wanted to go to Newy on a multi year deal for probably more money than what we have offered him.
It was our fault prioritizing him over Hastings.
This is the best outcome atm.
One option he leaves and good luck to him hope he kills it.
Another is we sign him for maybe more than our current offer but no where near the million that others thought we might be silly enough to do.
Come what may.
He wanted to go to Newy on a multi year deal for probably more money than what we have offered him.
It was our fault prioritizing him over Hastings.
This is the best outcome atm.
One option he leaves and good luck to him hope he kills it.
Another is we sign him for maybe more than our current offer but no where near the million that others thought we might be silly enough to do.
Come what may.
851
Well-known member
Paul Gallen said the same on 100% footy, that is where his value is
Coastie_Tiger
Well-known member
Funnily enough i just watched that clip, he wasnt wrong though if you're paid an elite salary you expect elite results. They just arent there simple as that, if he was retained as a 6 with a proper half next to him he'd be good i reckon $600 is where i see his stocks. Clubs arent exactly busting the doors down to get him, he's either overplayed his hand or he's playing a blinder we wait and see now.
I certainly do not trust our management and i have been saying for many years the entire system and current structure needs to go.I would hate to have a heartbeat with the same trendline that Sheens has given us as i am trying to avoid climbing into a box in the near future
supercoach
Well-known member
Brooks value has nothing to do with his ability. It’s all about how badly a club needs him and at present our six and seven stocks are diabolical for next year. So unless the club has something stitched up for next year, I would imagine there will be another offer. Although I think he will walk if he gets a offer close to ours.
Don’t get too excited, he isn’t gone yet, you’re riding the roller coaster of being a WT fan
He's dominating games at a shit show like the Wests Tigers...
But won't ever do it at another more successful club - Of course he wont....
Sara Lee might need to increase production on the humble pie around Christmas.,..
You might be spot on. Interesting times!
ancient_magpie
Well-known member
Dominating games you must be watching different games to me
