Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

I'm going to assume he wasn't wholly responsible for those losses.

It also shows a lack of knowledge from Tony. Hawkins was used extremely poorly by Demetriou by playing him as a direct replacement for Cody. He just isn't that type of player. Imagine putting Coopet Cronk at 6 to replace Lockyer and get him to play the exact same role, it just isn't his game.
 
In more realistic terms, I know Dean Hawkins from the Rabbitohs has been mentioned coming over. I'm surprised that didn't receive as much interest as I thought it might.

Solid player that has sat behind better players his whole career. Kicks well & runs just enough to be a danger. Doesn't mind defence either. In all honesty- when you are at the bottom (and Wakefield & Will Smith suggests that is where we are), it's guys like this that get their shot & can sometimes be just what is needed.

In the search for a bigger, more physical presence out wide- just realised Isaac Lumelume is on a train & trial at the Eels. Been through a few clubs, but he has that athletic build we DON'T have (along with the crazy eye look). Looked pretty promising at the Storm, straight out of the Sharks baby factory a couple of years back.

I don't know a great deal about him and i honestly think i've only seen one half of footy from him. I'm guessing lots of others havent seen a great deal of him either. Ive only seen him rumoured to be coming on a train and trial basis, if theres anything more in it, i guess it would be interesting to take more of an interest in him.
We do need halves especially depth in our halves, hopefully we are slowly addressing our halves depth i'd also like us to be looking at outside backs.
 
It also shows a lack of knowledge from Tony. Hawkins was used extremely poorly by Demetriou by playing him as a direct replacement for Cody. He just isn't that type of player. Imagine putting Coopet Cronk at 6 to replace Lockyer and get him to play the exact same role, it just isn't his game.

Theory goes, if the half can't lead a souths team to beat dogs wests tigers need not apply.
 
I think the player Buzz is talking about is Tino. No inside info, but he is off contract after this year due to Holbrook being sacked. He would be a player who is bigger than Api. One of the best middles in the game at preset.
 
Rubbish…
I’m happy to admit when he’s not played well.

The main difference in our argument - I’m yet to see any evidence (and none of you have certainly not provided any)
we’re a better side without him…
despite all your assurance over the past however many years that a trained monkey would do a better job…

I’m wondering who y’all gonna hold responsible for this crap team being a borderline crap team again next year - one guarantee is, it won’t be Brooks
Ride that Brooks horse right to the death, maybe next year you take the blinkers off, but I’m betting you won’t
 
Theory goes, if the half can't lead a souths team to beat dogs wests tigers need not apply.

Still don't understand the situation mate. Did you watch those games? Hawkins played second receiver with Ilias taking on more control then ever, terrible coaching. Hawkins is an on the ball organising half. He won't get a team home playing out of position.
 
ponga is the reason they are winning mate not Hastings...and 900k a year no thanks
take Hastings put of that Newcastle side end if they have a fit ponga they still win games
like saying next year if Brooks plays well at Manly and they make the semis is it all on hin, no way I'm sure DCE and others have plenty to do with it
Hastings is not on $900k a year, let go of the Hastings hate and Brooks love
 
so next year, and Manly fires it is all Brooks... please
Lol don’t worry impossible…..after spending many hours of reading comments by the Forum Experts it is a given with Brooks at Manly next, they will be a bottom feeder. Like we have been been for the last 10 years or so. Brooks because he is so crap will make sure of it, like he did at WT.
 
Lol don’t worry impossible…..after spending many hours of reading comments by the Forum Experts it is a given with Brooks at Manly next, they will be a bottom feeder. Like we have been been for the last 10 years or so. Brooks because he is so crap will make sure of it, like he did at WT.
I'm one of Brooks's biggest detractors but he should by all rights go well at Manly because DCE is there as halfback and he doesn't have to play halfback.

That's been my biggest bug bear, he's an unintelligent player whose been played as our General for a decade. Plus he's had other blokes moved on because he's wanted the keys to the ship and the big money contracts
 
Back
Top