Earl, mate, it is hyperbolic.
And here's why:
Doueihi is the sole arbiter of the original post's intention.
If his intention, as stated, was to indicate that it is silly to suggest to a supporter base how they should talk to a certain subset of the population, then it doesn't matter how it 'may' have been interpreted by some, as those interpretations are irrelevant to the original post. They're merely manifestations of a bystander's perspective, rooted in their own biases and tendencies, culminating in an opinion completely removed of any relation to the original post.
To then choose a word like 'disgusting' to describe something that has been objectively explained by the poster, is hyperbolic, because the reference is to the de-contextualised, irrelevant interpretation of the post (which is mis-characterised and often exaggerated for effect), not the post itself. It is a unique strawman type of scenario where what's being attacked (or described as 'disgusting') is an incorrect representation of the original stance, not the stance itself.
Unfortunately for those seeking crucifixion, they do not get to decide the intention, as allowing anyone's interpretation to be just as valid as the next means nobody is able to say anything without facing recompense, given that there is nearly an endless number of ways nearly everything that's said can be interpreted.
MEANING..... AD, and he alone, gets to decide the intention of his own posts.
