Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Probably demonstrates the conflict of interest when you decide to have your sponsor as your chair.Lee's situation is interesting. If he's removed as Chairman or as a director as a consequence of this review, why would he not just withdraw his sponsorship as he leaves the building.
He professes to be a fan, not just a tacky lawyer trying to recruit knockabouts who need a compensation payment.Lee's situation is interesting. If he's removed as Chairman or as a director as a consequence of this review, why would he not just withdraw his sponsorship as he leaves the building.
Lee's situation is interesting. If he's removed as Chairman or as a director as a consequence of this review, why would he not just withdraw his sponsorship as he leaves the building.
He’s a fan, a die hard. Cant knock him for passion. They need better capability I have no issue with a successful head of a legal firm on the board. Just shouldn’t have anything to do with footy operations.He professes to be a fan, not just a tacky lawyer trying to recruit knockabouts who need a compensation payment.
But therein lies part of the debate about his PRIMARY responsibilities, which has never really been clarified.A CEO taking an organisation backwards normally gets moved on fairly quickly in the real world.
Probably will and get his fat head on TV and radio and start bagging the club he loves , please he sponsors other clubs , that to me is not the sponsor you want , you want to team up with a major sponsor who wants his name on our jumpers no one else , plenty multi millionair companies and folks out there , maybe give Gina a call heard she does a bit of mining , she can go up against Twiggy Forrest , 👍Lee's situation is interesting. If he's removed as Chairman or as a director as a consequence of this review, why would he not just withdraw his sponsorship as he leaves the building.
Not fulton, not nofoHe’s a fan, a die hard. Cant knock him for passion. They need better capability I have no issue with a successful head of a legal firm on the board. Just shouldn’t have anything to do with footy operations.
Just hire the bast people available they are out there.
He would of walked long ago if he was a fan - when he worked out he’s bad for results. I think he just likes being in the news (likes calling others irrelevant all the time).He’s a fan, a die hard. Cant knock him for passion. They need better capability I have no issue with a successful head of a legal firm on the board. Just shouldn’t have anything to do with footy operations.
Just hire the bast people available they are out there.
Every time he is in the news he gets front Page advertising , if he is on camera at the club he gets his name in the back ground , his business name , yes he may be a fan but he is not the sponsor we wantHe would have walked long ago if he was a fan - when he worked out he’s bad for results. I think he just likes being in the news (likes calling others irrelevant all the time).
I have no problem with him being a sponsor but i have huge problems with him being the main spokesman and apparently involved with the signing/sacking of coaches players and all other officials involved at the club.The club is not his toy despite what he believesEvery time he is in the news he gets front Page advertising , if he is on camera at the club he gets his name in the back ground , his business name , yes he may be a fan but he is not the sponsor we want
Every time he is in the news he gets front Page advertising , if he is on camera at the club he gets his name in the back ground , his business name , yes he may be a fan but he is not the sponsor we want
Wests Tigers fans are slow to trust. And with good reason.
He has such a great legal mind that he probably signed an iron clad sponsorship contract that he can't get out of.Lee's situation is interesting. If he's removed as Chairman or as a director as a consequence of this review, why would he not just withdraw his sponsorship as he leaves the building.
We'll take the $15,000,000 from Gina that those dopey women didn't want because of something her father may have said 50 or 60 years ago. If her old man was still around I'd let Old Lang Sign.Probably will and get his fat head on TV and radio and start bagging the club he loves , please he sponsors other clubs , that to me is not the sponsor you want , you want to team up with a major sponsor who wants his name on our jumpers no one else , plenty multi millionair companies and folks out there , maybe give Gina a call heard she does a bit of mining , she can go up against Twiggy Forrest , 👍
I had a gut feeling this article was directed at Nofolooooza 🥾Wests Tigers fans are slow to trust. And with good reason.
They’ve been burned 1000 times before, by broken promises of change, by expectations placed on kids too young to bear the weight, by then losing those kids to see them blossom elsewhere, by new coaches and new recruits and a net result of failure since 2011.
All they want is a club they can believe in, with solid, pragmatic governance that makes sense.
They want their highly paid players to go to training and dig in when things get hard.
They want accountability.
If they wanted some rich guy to run the club, they could have sold the whole shit show to Harry, but they didn't want that so why are they letting this clown do it.I have no problem with him being a sponsor but i have huge problems with him being the main spokesman and apparently involved with the signing/sacking of coaches players and all other officials involved at the club.The club is not his toy despite what he believes
Close to defamation. Careful.He professes to be a fan, not just a tacky lawyer trying to recruit knockabouts who need a compensation payment.
Bcoz he loves the Tigers and will do whatever it takes for the club. Even if that means no board for bagypants. 👊Lee's situation is interesting. If he's removed as Chairman or as a director as a consequence of this review, why would he not just withdraw his sponsorship as he leaves the building.
Because they signed a legally binding contract. Unless there was Chairman clause there's nothing they can do about sponsorship unless club wants to terminate the deal to get rid of himLee's situation is interesting. If he's removed as Chairman or as a director as a consequence of this review, why would he not just withdraw his sponsorship as he leaves the building.