WT Ownership, The Board & Senior Management - MEGA Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
TIGERS said:
Absolutely not. I care about my club and its culture deeply and refuse to join in on an unthinking a populist pile on. I can do better than groupthink.

Your comment carries a barely hidden subtext that if this review does not sufficiently scapegoat the people you expect scapegoated, we have to bully and criticise people in our club via their personal and professional channels. Thats not being a fan, thats being a troll. What a disgrace, grow up.

The review is happening. You'll get the results in good time. It won't by nature, change any existing constraints and realities that make it hard for our club to compete or strategise long term in the player market. It won't change the human nature that make Rugby League boardrooms inherently political places. It won't stop leaks or factionalism. It won't calm down ferbile podcasters or put an end to fox news pile ons. It won't stop Roy Masters writing articles about our board like its a chapter from Game of Thrones.

You don't speak for all of the fans. Yes, perhaps its time for a change. If I want to protest I'll do it at games, I'll do it directly to the club, within the world of Rugby League in general.
Click to expand...
In very good time!!

And a good time was had by all!!

MERRY CHRISTMAS

1702376981634.png
 
WesternSuburbsBoy said:
1702377067542.png
Click to expand...
whatever-blah.gif
 
davey_farrell said:
Totally agree with you Lestrange...he is going to go to town tomorrow, he may even try and sue the club, now wouldnt that be ironic
Click to expand...
Sue the club???

For what??

As he stated - "myself and Justin serve at the discretion of the Board".....

Now the dummy spit and blame game to his "fellow directors" as I fully expected - BUT NIL legal recourse!!

Lucky they didn't audit his use of the Corporate Hospitality card - or he could be the one looking at legal action!!


1702377201819.png
 
hammertime said:
If true though. He has a point. Why wouldn't he be interviewed for the review?
Click to expand...
Who knows but have to bear in mind their actions when review first announced- remember the self appointment as chairman for another 2 years basically giving the finger to the review, remember the vitriol to the reviewers and WT podcast via Riccio via Hagi? Maybe they brushed the reviewers and didnt make time available? Also entirety possible this was the first stage of a review speaking to people under / apart from the direct leadership of CEO / Chairman? If so I hope that is explained in the review methodology later.
 
gallagher said:
I'm gonna enjoy this. He'll find few friends in the NRL media. His voice means nothing now that he isn't a chairman, I wonder when he'll realise that.
Click to expand...


The media will use him up for sneaky headlines over the offseason a then discard him like an old tissue. His time is done. Talked big, failed spectacularly and was fired without even being spoken to. The utter distain the organization has for him must be huge.

This time next season, the only time we will even think of him is if they play clips of 2022/23 seasons and we see that ugly logo.

As for Pascoe, I’d expect you’d only see him if you were in the market for a used Hyundai.

Great day.
 
Eternal Tiger said:
Lee has threatened legal action for the Club, heaps of times, hasn't had a win yet.
Click to expand...
Not even a legitimate legal argument/case - let alone a win!!

Paid silks $1000s from club funds just to advise that legal action to change the Cowboys result last year was an exercise in futility and stupidity!!

Anyone with a fricking clue knew that!!!

But the social media morons were applauding his BS- just as they did when Marina Go wanted to legally challenge the Pascoe salary cap debacle....

1702378884187.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Staff online

Members online

Total: 1,606 (members: 40, guests: 1,566)
Back
Top