Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

It’s a highlight of attending the footy not to have the game interpreted by blatherers.

Those periods of relative quiet when the players are softening up and testing each other. The chess part of the match.

The nrl seem hell bent on ending the mid field contest. Metres seem cheaper these days ( for other sides anyway).

I’m not against the general swing for attack, but sometimes I miss the hard yards.

The winger doing a double flip, reverse turnpike, leapfroggy somersault to score with one finger on a single blade of grass is getting ho hum ( unless it’s us). I like the wedge or Stef carrying 4 defenders over with him in the islander Geronimo goose step.

Oh yeah, we signed Jerome.
 
Last edited:
He’s boring too.

I met DWZ once whence he was a dog

He was so humble and cool, Blorey quality of person.

It was during his days of struggle, so nice to see him come back.

I like Blorey, but for the record, it was a sound swap on paper. We simply couldn’t miss the opportunity to get Olam operational again.

Exploratory player surgery, pass me the knife, sutures and wipe my brow!

I think Olam was always under appreciated at the Storm. Lost in the hustle and bustle of marquee.

For us, he’s so big time!

Just my thoughts. I’m looking forward to meeting him.
I remember one night we played at LO... Lost, but long long after ALL the players had gone Inside MWZ Was still going around the perimeter fences.. Signing autographs and posing for photos
 
I remember one night we played at LO... Lost, but long long after ALL the players had gone Inside MWZ Was still going around the perimeter fences.. Signing autographs and posing for photos
Yeah it doesn’t take much and it’s part of the territory.

Unless of course you’re a psychopath like Catterson.

He looks like he could turn into one of those domestic violence husbands one day.

Him and RCG. Pour beer on their wives for not making their dinner hot enough,

We might have the spoon, but at least our players are good blokes. The good die young l suppose,
 

It’s a highlight of attending the footy not to have the game interpreted by blatherers.

Those periods of relative quiet when the players are softening up and testing each other. The chess part of the match.

The nrl seem hell bent on ending the mid field contest. Metres seem cheaper these days ( for other sides anyway).

I’m not against the general swing for attack, but sometimes I miss the hard yards.

The winger doing a double flip, reverse turnpike, leapfroggy somersault to score with one finger on a single blade of grass is getting ho hum ( unless it’s us). I like the wedge or Stef carrying 4 defenders over with him in the islander Geronimo goose step.

Oh yeah, we signed Jerome.
The biggest example of this is the 20 metre zero tackle restart. It was brought in to stop teams kicking dead on purpose to take the return by the likes of Jarryd Hayne and Billy Slater out of the game. But it also acts as an incentive against normal fifth tackle options: kicking a grubber for a winger who can't quite ground it is obviously not a negative play, yet it has the same outcome as booting dead from half way. Worse, there are completely peverse outcomes: if a winger dives for the line and drops it in play, restart with a first tackle at 10m. If he drops it in goal, zero tackles 20m.

It would be really, really easy to resolve, too. Just say that the zero tackle rule applies to any kick taken from outside a certain range - say, 30m. Or kicks that go dead untouched, or dead through the back of the in goal. But the NRL has no interest in making this 'fair' - they just want as many sets as possible starting in good field position, thus increasing the chance of points. The best thing about this rule is that it gives teams a leg up right at the handover, so it's relatively low impact.

It will backfire eventually. You already see teams dying with the ball on the fifth rather than risking a 20m restart, especially at the end of games when protecting a lead - when they judge that the risk of a 20m restart is greater than the pay off of possibly scoring. And in golden point, teams often turn down long range field goals because the relatively low chance of scoring isn't worth the better opportunity the opposition will likely get from a 20m zero tackle restart. Sooner or later there will be a period of time in which goal line defence has the upper hand, and teams won't want to roll the dice on the last unless desperate or with a gigantic overlap etc. But then the NRL will just change the rules again.
 
Is this a cricket thread?

Haha..off season tendencies I think. Personally I like how this thread sometimes evolves into different things. I know we have tried to keep that in other threads, but the fact is this thread is the only one most care about so this is where the most traffic is. It can vary away from the thread title a lot as a result.
 
The biggest example of this is the 20 metre zero tackle restart. It was brought in to stop teams kicking dead on purpose to take the return by the likes of Jarryd Hayne and Billy Slater out of the game. But it also acts as an incentive against normal fifth tackle options: kicking a grubber for a winger who can't quite ground it is obviously not a negative play, yet it has the same outcome as booting dead from half way. Worse, there are completely peverse outcomes: if a winger dives for the line and drops it in play, restart with a first tackle at 10m. If he drops it in goal, zero tackles 20m.

It would be really, really easy to resolve, too. Just say that the zero tackle rule applies to any kick taken from outside a certain range - say, 30m. Or kicks that go dead untouched, or dead through the back of the in goal. But the NRL has no interest in making this 'fair' - they just want as many sets as possible starting in good field position, thus increasing the chance of points. The best thing about this rule is that it gives teams a leg up right at the handover, so it's relatively low impact.

It will backfire eventually. You already see teams dying with the ball on the fifth rather than risking a 20m restart, especially at the end of games when protecting a lead - when they judge that the risk of a 20m restart is greater than the pay off of possibly scoring. And in golden point, teams often turn down long range field goals because the relatively low chance of scoring isn't worth the better opportunity the opposition will likely get from a 20m zero tackle restart. Sooner or later there will be a period of time in which goal line defence has the upper hand, and teams won't want to roll the dice on the last unless desperate or with a gigantic overlap etc. But then the NRL will just change the rules again.
OMG, I thought I was alone.
Well said.
 
I also grew up in Berowra. Well Berowra Heights. I didn’t know he grew up there.
u wld enjoy the book.Berowra at the time was semi rural and.sounds an idyllic place to grow up vs houso dominated inner west in the 50s/60s that many of us (incl self)experienced
He went to local primary school,then Knox Grammar high school from memory
Not sure h'se ever had a real job(other than pro footballer/freelance journo) where listening and engagement with others wld normlly be normally pre requisites
 
Last edited:
Most threads deviate on forums. Someone raises a point others find interesting and the train of thought follows. Then it’s up to the mods I guess.

I was listening to Flanno recently, he says it’s going to take some time for his players to play the game how he wants them to.

Kind of like an indoctrination process and i guess it’s the same for Benji.

I think one of our players said last year that when he’s training us, he can be pretty harsh but then chuck a wink in here or there to individuals so they know it’s nothing personal. So that’s one of his tactics.

Very different from Madges final days, where people said he had players walking on eggshells and high anxiety issues. Not to knock him personally.
I think the end of the relationship was probably right, but the timing not so good.

Jason Taylor has given some very interesting interviews about coaching, the wrong coach at the wrong time for us.

People compare coaches, but with a few exceptions it’s hard as they usually have different material to work with.
 
Anyone watching NITV and the Koori Cup will recognise former Aust Schools and Balmain 5/8 Chris Morcombe playing 13 for South Taree.
The last try in this clip Shows Chris Morcombe scoring a try in both his and Balmain's second last game in the top grade in round 25 of 1999, unfortunately still losing to the Dogs.

He finished the season as Balmain's top try scorer with 9 tries. Makes a great break and backs up nicely to finish the try. Some other nice tries and memories in that short clip.

 
The last try in this clip Shows Chris Morcombe scoring a try in both his and Balmain's second last game in the top grade in round 25 of 1999, unfortunately still losing to the Dogs.

He finished the season as Balmain's top try scorer with 9 tries. Makes a great break and backs up nicely to finish the try. Some other nice tries and memories in that short clip.

Thanks for posting this clip. It was great to watch and Chris Morcombe was one of my favourites.
 
The last try in this clip Shows Chris Morcombe scoring a try in both his and Balmain's second last game in the top grade in round 25 of 1999, unfortunately still losing to the Dogs.

He finished the season as Balmain's top try scorer with 9 tries. Makes a great break and backs up nicely to finish the try. Some other nice tries and memories in that short clip.

Great memories of some brilliant tries. Can we create some more this season , PLEASE !!!!
 
The last try in this clip Shows Chris Morcombe scoring a try in both his and Balmain's second last game in the top grade in round 25 of 1999, unfortunately still losing to the Dogs.

He finished the season as Balmain's top try scorer with 9 tries. Makes a great break and backs up nicely to finish the try. Some other nice tries and memories in that short clip.


Love watching the old clips. Thanks for sharing.
 
Most threads deviate on forums. Someone raises a point others find interesting and the train of thought follows. Then it’s up to the mods I guess.

I was listening to Flanno recently, he says it’s going to take some time for his players to play the game how he wants them to.

Kind of like an indoctrination process and i guess it’s the same for Benji.

I think one of our players said last year that when he’s training us, he can be pretty harsh but then chuck a wink in here or there to individuals so they know it’s nothing personal. So that’s one of his tactics.

Very different from Madges final days, where people said he had players walking on eggshells and high anxiety issues. Not to knock him personally.
I think the end of the relationship was probably right, but the timing not so good.

Jason Taylor has given some very interesting interviews about coaching, the wrong coach at the wrong time for us.

People compare coaches, but with a few exceptions it’s hard as they usually have different material to work with.
Think Madge will be a success at SOO,as hes very good at pulling together established senior players into a cohesive team(Souths/Wigan/NZ)..but not so good at developing young players nor developing a winning culture amongst these types
 
OMG, I thought I was alone.
Well said.
It really drives me nuts because it's such a lazy way of promoting 'exciting' football. As in, I want to see teams taking high risk, high reward options on the last - scoring brilliant tries or being kept out by desperate defensive plays. And yet this rule gives a massive disincentive to doing so. The NRL apparently thinks it's more important to just get the other team up the other end as quickly as possible, as if all us dumb punters want is every game to end up 40-36 with a bunch of barge over or overlap tries (or, for one season, 72-6 with one team running wild up the middle) and aren't capable of appreciating a game that finishes 18-16 where every point is incredibly hard fought for.
 
Most threads deviate on forums. Someone raises a point others find interesting and the train of thought follows. Then it’s up to the mods I guess.

I was listening to Flanno recently, he says it’s going to take some time for his players to play the game how he wants them to.

Kind of like an indoctrination process and i guess it’s the same for Benji.

I think one of our players said last year that when he’s training us, he can be pretty harsh but then chuck a wink in here or there to individuals so they know it’s nothing personal. So that’s one of his tactics.

Very different from Madges final days, where people said he had players walking on eggshells and high anxiety issues. Not to knock him personally.
I think the end of the relationship was probably right, but the timing not so good.

Jason Taylor has given some very interesting interviews about coaching, the wrong coach at the wrong time for us.

People compare coaches, but with a few exceptions it’s hard as they usually have different material to work with.
Fair point, we can't compare say Madge to Cleary as Cleary was building a squad while Madge had to manage what was built.

I think Taylor was trying to beef up our roster and keep Taupau, but boy did he go about it like an idiot. Had Taylor worked with Farah instead of declaring WW3 he may have lasted. But poor people skills is in Taylor's DNA. Fired from 2 clubs for it.

A coach needs to get a lot of things right and delegate their weaknesses out to people.

Todd Payten and Fitzgibbon know how to manage and work a forward pack, backs and halves far less so.

Your older coaches will get both roles, but may not have kept up with the changing game, i.e. Tim Sheens.

I think Marshall has the people management skills and respect of the players.
Where Marshall will lack is defensive structures having played mostly under us, along with how to coach/work with a forward pack.

Hopefully Chris H and J Morris can make up for these weaknesses.
 
Fair point, we can't compare say Madge to Cleary as Cleary was building a squad while Madge had to manage what was built.

I think Taylor was trying to beef up our roster and keep Taupau, but boy did he go about it like an idiot. Had Taylor worked with Farah instead of declaring WW3 he may have lasted. But poor people skills is in Taylor's DNA. Fired from 2 clubs for it.

A coach needs to get a lot of things right and delegate their weaknesses out to people.

Todd Payten and Fitzgibbon know how to manage and work a forward pack, backs and halves far less so.

Your older coaches will get both roles, but may not have kept up with the changing game, i.e. Tim Sheens.

I think Marshall has the people management skills and respect of the players.
Where Marshall will lack is defensive structures having played mostly under us, along with how to coach/work with a forward pack.

Hopefully Chris H and J Morris can make up for these weaknesses.
Can I just also say CC “ if Farah had worked with Taylor he would have lasted “.
Robbie has been in and around a lot of shit for the Tigers and when I was around football it was the players who respected the coach and didn’t try to undermine them.
Taylor may not have had the appropriate skills but he was still the head coach. Same at South’s, so he was entitled to some respect.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top