ROZELLE.O.G
Well-known member
Shopping any player around to off load them is not by mutual decision. Sullivan and Klemmer finding they would be shopped around contradicts what Richo has stated about contracts. Tartak isnt going to settle for anything less for what his player to contracted for, he has quite of number of kids in the top 30 so dealing with him is going to be very difficult for us.The club has every right to seek to balance the cap and fill gaps in the squad.
Secondly, these players are not regular first graders on decent contracts. If they can get a start elsewhere, it benefits both parties.
If it's by mutual decision, it's fine. The Galvin situation is not mutual.
I am all for our club to balance their salary cap to what it needs to be so its optimised but the correction that is needed here is a huge. Even after a few players like Sullivan,Klemmer, Papalilli and anyone else they can move is done, what is there in the market to bring in, its clearly not much better, especially when we need to pay over to attract a player to our club. Luai had to be lured with $300-400k more per season than what Penrith offered him, even the high spending Bulldogs pulled out late.
We also have very little depth with all the young kids that have been signed to top 30 deals for next year. Many of them couldn't dominate SG Ball this year. I feel for Richo and Benji there is a huge mess to clean up,