Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

difference between dogs and tigers is that dogs can cut the deadwood lose and signed better than average first graders.

Perhaps calling out Bateman and him walking out this season will work out in our favour…but chances are we will be paying big $$ for him to play in England next year. Or worse, ressies for us.
He's not a million a year player though, so paying a small amount for him to be elsewhere isn't that big of a deal.

Reportedly, $670k is what his contract is worth. By releasing him early, we retain $150k of his 2024 salary.

This effectively makes his '25 salary $520k, or, his combined 25/26 salary an average of less than 600k (around 595k). This makes both moving him easier and the amount we'll need to chip in, less.

For instance, teams, including in the NRL, might not want a $670k/yr, 30 year old Bateman for 2 years, but, may be interested in a circa $500k/yr Bateman for a couple, meaning we'd only have to throw in around 100k, given what we've saved on him this year.

Spending $100k a year to free up a spot and moving an underperforming player is not the worst outcome, especially as that amount represents less than 1% of the salary cap. In fact, it's closer to 1/125th of the cap.

An almost irrelevant amount.
 
Last edited:
What is pissing me off is that they are saying he will be back next year.

So what do we do, do we wait to see if he turns up by round 4 and if he doesn't we finally find out that we have a top 30 spot to fill and then have to use it to promote another junior with "potential" because no one else is available on such short notice?

I don't want him to come back, I want it confirmed now so we know that we have a spot to fill and how much cap money we have so we at least have some sort of a chance to sign someone now that can actually do a pre-season with us and be ready to go when the season kicks off.
 
What is pissing me off is that they are saying he will be back next year.

So what do we do, do we wait to see if he turns up by round 4 and if he doesn't we finally find out that we have a top 30 spot to fill and then have to use it to promote another junior with "potential" because no one else is available on such short notice?

I don't want him to come back, I want it confirmed now so we know that we have a spot to fill and how much cap money we have so we at least have some sort of a chance to sign someone now that can actually do a pre-season with us and be ready to go when the season kicks off.
They'll know early preseason, if not sooner, I'd say.

Seems to me like both parties are proper off each other. So this hiatus acts as a chance for him to cool down and reassess and (hopefully) be motivated to head back to ESL.
 
Darby Lancaster debuted for wallabies on the weekend as a 21 year old. We were never going to sign him but looks like he’s going to get locked up there for a while.
He played rubbish lol, a lot of people are questioning how he even got picked for that wallabies squad
 
This article sheds alot of light on how Melbourne manage their salary cap:


It wont be like this forever, when Bellamy leaves, all of a sudden Melbourne isn't quite as appealing for everyone.
 
He's not a million a year player though, so paying a small amount for him to be elsewhere isn't that big of a deal.

Reportedly, $670k is what his contract is worth. By releasing him early, we retain $150k of his 2024 salary.

This effectively makes his '25 salary $520k, or, his combined 25/26 salary an average of less than 600k (around 595k). This makes both moving him easier and the amount we'll need to chip in, less.

For instance, teams, including in the NRL, might not want a $670k/yr, 30 year old Bateman for 2 years, but, may be interested in a circa $500k/yr Bateman for a couple, meaning we'd only have to throw in around 100k, given what we've saved on him this year.

Spending $100k a year to free up a spot and moving an underperforming player is not the worst outcome, especially as that amount represents less than 1% of the salary cap. In fact, it's closer to 1/125th of the cap.

An almost irrelevant amount.
Don’t disagree with your hypothetical numbers. $100k probably isn’t much, but at the same time, it’s almost half a minimum wage contract. So 2 batemans is a young next best thing with 250k extra to sign a better than average player.

It’s all about who you replace him with. (and Ipap and Steff). And also trying to remotivate or cut lose Klemmer. Most our pack is gone. Every dollar counts. Restarting the rebuild again.
 
I know for a fact that Jermaine Hopgood went to eels after having lunch with Brad Arthur and apparently they hit it off, and now Brad ain’t there. I also know that he was never coming here even though we spoke to him. But that was before we sacked Sheens, sacked most of the board, signed Richo, signed Luai and Turuva, and his former Api Captain is here?
Hopgood is not a game changer on is own but he’s definitely not a bludger, and we need a set and forget lock until the next gun ball playing lock comes along. Also gives our younger locks at the club time to develop their game in reggies bcoz they ain’t ready.
He is not available to talk till November 1, but since when has that stopped anyone from talking to our players. Gould does it while calling a game, right in front of everyone.
 
So your sacking Benji off the back of a rumoured comment made by the worst player in the team (all things considered) when that said player was going to get dropped? This week's actions strengthens Benji's position as coach. Don't get me wrong, I still feel it's a long shot Benji will turn us around, but axing underperforming highly paid senior players is the right move. It's also a really big and significant move.
Whatever Batemans problem was, it's completely unprofessional to refuse to go to the press conference and throw your toys out of the pram by abusing the coach in front of the team. Allegedly...

In saying that, if Benji walked into the sheds at full time and called him out in front of everyone, that shows poor judgement from Benji too. Allegedly...
 
Whatever Batemans problem was, it's completely unprofessional to refuse to go to the press conference and throw your toys out of the pram by abusing the coach in front of the team. Allegedly...

In saying that, if Benji walked into the sheds at full time and called him out in front of everyone, that shows poor judgement from Benji too. Allegedly...

Agree if the alleged story is true ..than it could have been handled better and more privately …hopefully a lesson learnt there for BM

I don’t mind though that they aren’t just going through the motions … normally they are sleepwalking by now through the last couple of months of the season ..
 
I know for a fact that Jermaine Hopgood went to eels after having lunch with Brad Arthur and apparently they hit it off, and now Brad ain’t there. I also know that he was never coming here even though we spoke to him. But that was before we sacked Sheens, sacked most of the board, signed Richo, signed Luai and Turuva, and his former Api Captain is here?
Hopgood is not a game changer on is own but he’s definitely not a bludger, and we need a set and forget lock until the next gun ball playing lock comes along. Also gives our younger locks at the club time to develop their game in reggies bcoz they ain’t ready.
He is not available to talk till November 1, but since when has that stopped anyone from talking to our players. Gould does it while calling a game, right in front of everyone.
Hopgood is a wep.....

He is only getting better to.
Yes please.
 
This article sheds alot of light on how Melbourne manage their salary cap:


It wont be like this forever, when Bellamy leaves, all of a sudden Melbourne isn't quite as appealing for everyone.

NRL needs Melbourne to remain competitive. Even if Bellamy goes, they will have some clone come in and do the same thing. The game won’t grow there if they are shit.

It’s like what the AFL do with the Swans and are trying to with GWS.
 
If Coffs Harbour has the Big Banana, Belmore has the Big Sombrero!
Of all the clubs, not sure how Dogs come under scrutiny for a 'sombrero'.
They would have the cheapest 1 and 7 (Sezer aside) in the game. A largely unheralded forward pack outside of Kikau which typically features 2 first year rookies every week. And there big money centre and wing is balanced by Xerri bought on the cheap after his drug ban and Kiraz who they got after he wasn't offered a contract at Knights.
There'd be a dozen clubs I'd question before the Dogs. Though I'd admit outside looking in perhaps they got away with some shenanigans with Jackson early retirement and Pangai walking away, however no evidence of any actual wrong doing.
 
I know for a fact that Jermaine Hopgood went to eels after having lunch with Brad Arthur and apparently they hit it off, and now Brad ain’t there. I also know that he was never coming here even though we spoke to him. But that was before we sacked Sheens, sacked most of the board, signed Richo, signed Luai and Turuva, and his former Api Captain is here?
Hopgood is not a game changer on is own but he’s definitely not a bludger, and we need a set and forget lock until the next gun ball playing lock comes along. Also gives our younger locks at the club time to develop their game in reggies bcoz they ain’t ready.
He is not available to talk till November 1, but since when has that stopped anyone from talking to our players. Gould does it while calling a game, right in front of everyone.

Hopgood is one of the best locks in the game.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top