Kelce68
Well-known member
He's not a million a year player though, so paying a small amount for him to be elsewhere isn't that big of a deal.difference between dogs and tigers is that dogs can cut the deadwood lose and signed better than average first graders.
Perhaps calling out Bateman and him walking out this season will work out in our favour…but chances are we will be paying big $$ for him to play in England next year. Or worse, ressies for us.
Reportedly, $670k is what his contract is worth. By releasing him early, we retain $150k of his 2024 salary.
This effectively makes his '25 salary $520k, or, his combined 25/26 salary an average of less than 600k (around 595k). This makes both moving him easier and the amount we'll need to chip in, less.
For instance, teams, including in the NRL, might not want a $670k/yr, 30 year old Bateman for 2 years, but, may be interested in a circa $500k/yr Bateman for a couple, meaning we'd only have to throw in around 100k, given what we've saved on him this year.
Spending $100k a year to free up a spot and moving an underperforming player is not the worst outcome, especially as that amount represents less than 1% of the salary cap. In fact, it's closer to 1/125th of the cap.
An almost irrelevant amount.
Last edited: