OFFICIAL Lachlan Galvin #277 *Released* Career Discussion.

Guess who's not getting an upgrade this year now.
Left a lot of.money on the table 2024, 2025 and 2026 if we don't release him. Enough to make to me think they have expectations of 1.5m plus.

Good luck to the kid, his family and manager have screwed themselves if he gets injured playing for "plan b" this season.
 
Galvin has too much hype about him in relation to what he delivers. It’s a classic Moses technique.

I think Latu may have a higher ceiling as he is more a threat with ball in hand and doesn’t seem to make rash decisions and plays very direct. He potentially is a better fit with Jerome as well as he doesn’t over play his hand.

if Galvin starts to do a Moses (Mitchell not Isaac) and push for a release, and Latu isn’t quite ready, the other possibility is Douiehi who has looked reasonable in the halves this year when given an opportunity
 
gonna be interesting how we handle this cause is latu gonna be 6 now when he comes back or are we going to continue playing Galvin at 6 until he is leaves in 2026
 
Lots of anti- Galvin posts in this thread.

My understanding of this situation is that Tigers wanted him to sign 5 years now or leave at the end of 2027. He chose to leave. Based on the state the club is in, why blame him? He will be in high demand for sure, and forget the high demand, I don't blame any player for not committing long term at the Tigers based on our history.

Tigers are right in asking him to commit now so that they can plan for 2027 and beyond. I feel we should have upgraded him and give him a year or two extension and if he doesn't sign that either, then move him on.
 
Nah, if there's someone with a sh1t attitude impacting team dynamic you don't pick them

Reggie's for Galvin
See both sides of this. Bagn is right, but if attitude or performance dips then he is no longer our best option. For now though with Latu out nothing should change except his team mates get ready to let him know if he isnt playing for the team. At any level of any sport, even in an office job, you always know.
 
Lots of anti- Galvin posts in this thread.

My understanding of this situation is that Tigers wanted him to sign 5 years now or leave at the end of 2027. He chose to leave. Based on the state the club is in, why blame him? He will be in high demand for sure, and forget the high demand, I don't blame any player for not committing long term at the Tigers based on our history.

Tigers are right in asking him to commit now so that they can plan for 2027 and beyond. I feel we should have upgraded him and give him a year or two extension and if he doesn't sign that either, then move him on.
Far too much sense for a footy fan

Everyone that ever plays for us should love the club and never ever want to leave! If they do they're a piece of crap!!
 
Richo's probably waiting for the avalanche of release requests and opposing clubs divesting themselves of players to fit him in their cap (or not).
Unless there is a top shelf second rower or maybe a prime middle on the table, Lachlan plays on at WT in whatever role best suits the club. Games are almost always won in the forward battle, so I doubt any team would choose to give one up.

Whilst Galvin is very young and obviously gifted, he has deficiencies as a half as well and may not fill out enough for other positions. Whilst he might improve to reach the heights that another WT Moses managed player that chose to leave did, I get Woodsy vibes when thinking of his choice to leave.
 
Well, rejecting the offer to test the waters doesn't mean he's not going. However, if the kid doesn't start playing like he did last year at least, he, his parents and Isaac Moses may have wished they did sign our deal now as he may not be worth the money on offer by November.

The kid, unfortunately, has the wrong people in his ear. We should do what the Roosters have done and not deal with Isaac Moses.
 
It's not punishing him, it's doing the best thing for the club. How does it make sense for the tigers to continue to develop him when we have another option that is up to it and needs development? He made he call, he knows the potential consequences.
It makes sense if Galvin plays well & the Tigers succeed.

You don't drop him for the sake of dropping him. He still needs to be outplayed.

What you don't do is pick him over a guy like Fainu if Fainu is outplaying him.
 

Staff online

Back
Top