I disagree with the state of team. The team this year and last year has largely been made up of players outside of top 30/dev contracts, particularly the forwards and the organising half. Yet they're up against teams who are stacked with top 30/dev each week.
Break it down for 2025:
1 top 30/dev middle - Kit Laulilii (injured)
1 top 30/dev edge - Porter (Sukkar now regularly part of the NRL squad).
0 top 30/dev halves - Falls and Mapapalangi
The state of the WT top 30 + development roster:
35 players (1 spot available)
Olam and Klemmer gone, replaced by Hope.
Matamua and Tumeth playing for feeder clubs.
Craig, Saukuru play Flegg, Makasini playing schoolboy rugby.
Skelton, Latu Fainu, Pole, Luke & KIt Laulilii currently injured medium term, and Naden and Staines part of that earlier in season too.
So out of the 36 players in top 30/dev, the club has been using about 25 to fill NRL 18, plus 7-8 left over in reserve grade each week, and the quality of the 7-8 is debatable. This team has been using about 10 players each week outside of top 30/dev. Opposition clubs in reserve grade are stacked with top 30/dev. In my opinion, some of the guys on peanuts and full-time jobs have been outplaying the WT top 30/dev players. That shouldn't be the case.
Alarmingly for the club, and it was in a similar situation last season, there are no depth props/backrowers in top 30/dev putting pressure on those selected for NRL each week. These guys are broken down and fatigued going by the last couple of weeks, but Benji genuinely has no one to replace them with. The weekend's NRL bench was Naden, Sukkar, Bird and Sione Fainu. I don't think you're going to win many NRL games with that balance on the bench. So can you imagine what's left over for reserve grade?
Be careful about making a one sentence blanket statements about a coach's ability. I think this is all too common around here. Analyse the situation.
@Jolls and
@BlackWhiteGold - keep up the great work. I don't post too much but I enjoy reading your contributions.