CEO - Shane Richardson

Status
Not open for further replies.
Zero because it is profit.

And Richo said on 360 tonight the club doesnt owe anyone anything anymore including the HBG.

So the HBG have evidently been viewing their funding of the NRL team as a repayable loan.

They are idiots.

They pick up the bill every time they get rid of a coach early and have to pay out his contract…so there’s that …
 
You raise some interesting points.

I think the overall solution is an elected board.

Democracy is not perfect, but it gives us a means to make people accountable.
The HBG hired independent auditors to investigate the club. The auditors advised them that they needed to elect an independent board to run the club.

That means the independent advisors literally told them they are the problem and can't run a club.

So now they have appointed an independent board and due to this have perceivably no actual influence in their own asset.

Except for the fact that the board still is elected entirely at the leisure of the HBG.

But at any rate you will not see success anywhere that the owner of the business is not actively interested in its success. And our owners appear very much not to be.
 
You have said it yourself … their business is running poker machine palaces … not making sporting teams successful …

Indeed. What I don't understand is if they have been told and accepted that they can't successfully run the club why they are continuing to put us through the misery of it.
 
Indeed. What I don't understand is if they have been told and accepted that they can't successfully run the club why they are continuing to put us through the misery of it.

I think you know the answer to that …

They aren’t the only shitty owners in world sport by the way… ask Man U fans what they think of their American owners
 
I think you know the answer to that …

They aren’t the only shitty owners on world sport by the way… ask Man U fans what they think of their owners
Yes it's because they like the prestige of owning an NRL team. They like the glitz and glamour of it but when it comes to the nitty gritty they are not only incapable but their existence is an active detriment.

And yes I know they aren't... But this is a forum for discussing the Tigers lol.
 
It’s ok @Odessa, I live in the Penrith catchment.

Gentrifying rapidly like Cambo.

It’s an interesting era for both areas.

It’s all happening out our ways. I like it out here except it’s over-pantherized.

Richo still has friends out here from his panther days.

He comes across as a blokey bloke, but he’s got a lot of formal qualifications. It’s good he doesn’t prattle on about that like Seibs does.
 
Last edited:
Yes it's because they like the prestige of owning an NRL team. They like the glitz and glamour of it but when it comes to the nitty gritty they are not only incapable but their existence is an active detriment.

And yes I know they aren't... But this is a forum for discussing the Tigers lol.

Just making the point - don’t expect them to sell the team because they suck as owners or might have feelings for the fans ( they don’t )
 
Indeed. What I don't understand is if they have been told and accepted that they can't successfully run the club why they are continuing to put us through the misery of it.
Out of interest, how long do you give a CEO to make change that is acceptable to you? Is it a 12 or 18 month limit before you believe that CEO has made zero difference? Do you base it on results only or do you compare performance also? By that I mean is losing by 2 points the same to you as losing by 60?

Could you tell us how you would have done it differently had you been given the reigns?

Would you have ignored the finances because winning would take care of that part?

How would you have guaranteed these wins? For example, Bennett, Flanagan and Hasler are all premiership winning and experienced coaches, yet sit well out of the 8. 2 of those guys were suggested for the Tigers by the forum. But going on what they are delivering, it's hard to imagine they would have made a difference to us.

How would you have shaped the roster. And if you would have done it differently, how can you, in the armchair, guarantee that you would have signed these players or alternatively, not lost players.

Help me understand what your methods would be to achieve your outcome within 18 months.
 
It’s just coincidence that the richest clubs have been consistently great for 25 years is it hahaha
Just a reminder - the following current NRL clubs have never won an NRL Premiership:

Canberra - Rich
Dolphins - Rich
Warriors - RIch
Parramatta - Rich
Gold Coast - Rich
 
Hey Twentyforty
Don’t believe everything you hear or read mate, I heard from someone very close that Galvin was starting at 5/8 early on the morning of the game.
That was known after their final training run,
Not 1 hour before kickoff
So when was the change made Oldman?
 
Out of interest, how long do you give a CEO to make change that is acceptable to you? Is it a 12 or 18 month limit before you believe that CEO has made zero difference? Do you base it on results only or do you compare performance also? By that I mean is losing by 2 points the same to you as losing by 60?

Could you tell us how you would have done it differently had you been given the reigns?

Would you have ignored the finances because winning would take care of that part?

How would you have guaranteed these wins? For example, Bennett, Flanagan and Hasler are all premiership winning and experienced coaches, yet sit well out of the 8. 2 of those guys were suggested for the Tigers by the forum. But going on what they are delivering, it's hard to imagine they would have made a difference to us.

How would you have shaped the roster. And if you would have done it differently, how can you, in the armchair, guarantee that you would have signed these players or alternatively, not lost players.

Help me understand what your methods would be to achieve your outcome within 18 months.

I have a podcast on this subject with 39 episodes if you actually want to know my perspective lol.

But it's a bit of a strawman because I'm not actually making a point that I think Richo should have solved our woes in 18 months. I'm making the point that making mild profit on low revenue is not an indicator of likely success and level that blame at the owners not him.

My only criticism of him is going on 360 and claiming it as such.
 
It’s ok @Odessa, I live in the Penrith catchment.

Gentrifying rapidly like Cambo.

It’s an interesting era for both areas.

It’s all happening out our ways. I like it out here except it’s over-pantherized.

Richo still has friends out here from his panther days.

He comes across as a blokey bloke, but he’s got a lot of formal qualifications. It’s good he doesn’t prattle on about that like Seibs does.


I drink at Panthers some times have breakfast at the bistro then sit near the big TV downstairs or outside on the grass area

One thing I have noticed about Penrith the young people love the shoes they mite be wearing $10 jeans but they have on $300 shoes
 
  • Like
Reactions: TSP
I drink at Panthers some times have breakfast at the bistro then sit near the big TV downstairs or outside on the grass area

One thing I have noticed about Penrith the young people love the shoes they mite be wearing $10 jeans but they have on $300 shoes

You are always out there at places like Panthers drinking and trying to get info from the locals about the WT … good on ya mate 👍
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TSP
You are always out there at places like Panthers drinking and trying to get info from the locals about the WT … good on ya mate 👍


I think I just like the drink more some days then talking but as you get old you start going to more funerals

A big Part of your life disappears friends gone never coming back and I like having a drink chatting about football and I feel I can connect to people of all ages over football

If I am at Panthers or Juniors or anywhere I can have a chat about footy

Football and alcohol the great social lubricant
 
Well if it's true Simon Cook has resigned maybe the next HBG CEO will have a different strategy for managing the football team.

It boggles my mind that an NRL side is treated like a burden to a company but that is how the HBG treat the Wests Tigers. The Wests Tigers are probably the best value content brand in Australia given how much free press it generates. If their owners had some vision and courage...
Remember though, that the new structure allows for complete independence from HBG at WT board level and Richo himself has reiterated, as recently as last night, that he was granted full corporate governance as WT CEO.

Ergo, all the restructuring was to take HBG out of any proper decision making at club level which is now, thank fully, in place.

So whoever Cook's replacement is, he'll have very, very little impact, if any at all, on the running of the football club.

I'd probably go so far as to say zero.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Back
Top