Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

tigahhh said:
the whole profit bs and less reliance on HBG…. save it richo i don’t care what profit we are making if we continue to be a bottom 4 side
Click to expand...
well you should.

like it or not HBG are as tight as a fish's arse. the only way we can ensure we can compete with the likes of Canterbury and Parramatta is thru becoming a self sustainable entity that funnels funds directly into the Football Department.

so when Richo says that we've turned a profit, it's a big deal, because being a profitable enterprise is the only way we remain out of the cellar.
 
yea
jrtiger said:
well you should.

like it or not HBG are as tight as a fish's arse. the only way we can ensure we can compete with the likes of Canterbury and Parramatta is thru becoming a self sustainable entity that funnels funds directly into the Football Department.

so when Richo says that we've turned a profit, it's a big deal, because being a profitable enterprise is the only way we remain out of the cellar.
Click to expand...
i get it i just think HBG should contribute more to get us out of the cellar
 
jrtiger said:
well you should.

like it or not HBG are as tight as a fish's arse. the only way we can ensure we can compete with the likes of Canterbury and Parramatta is thru becoming a self sustainable entity that funnels funds directly into the Football Department.

so when Richo says that we've turned a profit, it's a big deal, because being a profitable enterprise is the only way we remain out of the cellar.
Click to expand...
We need new owners bro ! I’m hoping when the current elderly members of our society finally kick the bucket , the people who inherit the HBG , maybe they’re from Ashfield with no affiliation to the tigers , so they sell the club to a consortium who have political sway , love the club and most importantly want to pump coin into it …
 
tigahhh said:
yea

i get it i just think HBG should contribute more to get us out of the cellar
Click to expand...
The only thing they want to contribute to is the wine and beer menu on game day in the owners box . They could give 2 sweet shits about anything other than sucking arse with the blue wiggle or Clarky or Konstas or whoever celeb / politician they can big note too .
Anyways …
 
Lestronge said:
We need new owners bro ! I’m hoping when the current elderly members of our society finally kick the bucket , the people who inherit the HBG , maybe they’re from Ashfield with no affiliation to the tigers , so they sell the club to a consortium who have political sway , love the club and most importantly want to pump coin into it …
Click to expand...
it won't happen unless someone with huge dollars comes in and takes the club off their hands for well above market value. it's like Newcastle in the EPL under Mike Ashley. they were run on a shoestring and utilised as a way for him to pocket funds and turn over profits easily. HBG get that in a similar manner.

it wasn't until Saudi's Public Investment Fund came in and bought the joint for £305 million and more than doubling his purchase price did he relent. unless Harry comes to the table with an offer that blows their minds, they'll just keep running it threadbare.

EDIT: I think it was part of Richardson's pitch for taking the job in the first place. give me what I want ('true corporate governance', quasi-dictator power) and I'll make enough cash to run the club as its own entity.
 
jrtiger said:
well you should.

like it or not HBG are as tight as a fish's arse. the only way we can ensure we can compete with the likes of Canterbury and Parramatta is thru becoming a self sustainable entity that funnels funds directly into the Football Department.

so when Richo says that we've turned a profit, it's a big deal, because being a profitable enterprise is the only way we remain out of the cellar.
Click to expand...
If only we had a billionaire owner who loves the Tigers and throwing in millions to improve the club was just a hobby to him, a drop in the bucket that he wouldn't give a second thought to parting with.
 
jrtiger said:
it won't happen unless someone with huge dollars comes in and takes the club off their hands for well above market value. it's like Newcastle in the EPL under Mike Ashley. they were run on a shoestring and utilised as a way for him to pocket funds and turn over profits easily. HBG get that in a similar manner.

it wasn't until Saudi's Public Investment Fund came in and bought the joint for £305 million and more than doubling his purchase price did he relent. unless Harry comes to the table with an offer that blows their minds, they'll just keep running it threadbare.

EDIT: I think it was part of Richardson's pitch for taking the job in the first place. give me what I want ('true corporate governance', quasi-dictator power) and I'll make enough cash to run the club as its own entity.
Click to expand...
You never know , maybe the dudes who own Atlassian are closet tigers fans . I see their short all over the Williams F1 team and I have to remind themselves they’re an Aussie company . . I dunno … maybe we do a Greenbay packers and have the community own the club . I’d dare say there would be a good 1k of people out there who were multi- millionaires like the blue wiggle . Happy to chuck 5-10 mil at the club , not 100mil . Don’t know how the board would work though .
 
innsaneink said:
So another arsey lucky signing like Taylan...nothing targetted, nothing planned...that was my fear.
His talk mid year on James Grahams pod resulted kpp
Not good...cant see us moving much with the same.coaches and.players
Click to expand...

Given we've been about the most active club in the player market since this guy came in, incomings and exits, and most of the business he has done has been somewhere between pretty good and excellent, I'd have though he'd have earned the right not to have dribblers just assuming he hasn't got a clue what he's doing.

The point about the mid-season update directly contradicts your argument, incidentally. What Richardson said at the time was that the club knows where it wants to improve the roster and is picking off players who it believes can do that. Specifically, it was back row and centre... and here we are a couple of months later and we've added KPP and Taylan May. What about that doesn't look planned to you? Do you seriously think the idea of signing May was some sort of idle whim?

I think you can also probably assume that there isn't a massive amount of space in the salary cap for 2026. They can't spend money they don't have.

I think the message on the interview was extremely clear: Richardson has spent a lot of time and effort clearing out dead wood and getting the club on an even keel. From here, stability and consistency is going to deliver improvements more than additional chopping and changing does, as well as what I've been talking about for months: building depth through production of our own players and signing for value if and when it's available.
 
Needaname said:
Richo needs to realise teams don’t go into next year just preparing for next year there is a whole bulk of players available to be added to the following years roster from Nov 1.
Or are we really just looking year to year and only looking to add anyone of note to next years squad.
Click to expand...
You don't think he does know that?

You think he has no idea?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 507 (members: 37, guests: 470)
Back
Top