I do get the overall premise from our Forum members that Jack Bird is an adequate depth member of our roster. The thing that stings me is that we are supposedly paying Jack $400,000 a year for the privilege.
When compared to the quoted salaries of players plying their trade in more successful teams, Jack Bird's return on investment is indicative of our less than desirable 13th placing on the NRL ladder.
The Brisbane Broncos succeeded in paying their Grand Final half back Adam Reynolds $500,000. They managed to steal their Grand Final five eighth, Ben Hunt for $550,000. As we all know, the Broncos win the premiership.
Another highly successful club of late, the Cronulla Sharks are paying their fullback, Will Kennedy a reported $300,000 to don the number one jersey. The Sharks are a top 5 team.
Do we see value in paying Jack Bird $400,000 a year to play ressies? If Jack was on $200,000 I think it would be a value depth signing. I have nothing against Jack and hope he can deliver for us next year but a player that for the most part is a depth member of our top 30 roster should not be earning $400,000 as is reported. Our club will never be truly competitive if we can't address the very obvious imbalance in player salaries.