HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

I would have thought it being a new year with no board issues to report over the past 4 or so weeks and recent information that suggests the HBG decision making will be strictly monitored by PVL would mean we could stop focusing on the board and start focusing on the rugby league for a while ?
Are some people more fascinated with the board than they are of the rugby league team ?
The football hasn't started and they are still on the board, well hopefully not for long even their own members can't stand their guts.

It's our hope to get rid of them once and for all to never give them another chance to meddle with our club well that's what we're praying for that the next lot have more brains.

Is this not the right thread to discuss it, there's is nothing stopping you discussing football in the other threads.
 
I would have thought it being a new year with no board issues to report over the past 4 or so weeks and recent information that suggests the HBG decision making will be strictly monitored by PVL would mean we could stop focusing on the board and start focusing on the rugby league for a while ?
Are some people more fascinated with the board than they are of the rugby league team ?
Issues all solved in 4 weeks?
 
I would have thought it being a new year and 6 week since you were caught out by formumers and AI, you'd give up coming here with your pro HBG propaganda.

Most of us can separate the on field footy and the backroom politics. So get used to it, mate.
Caught out giving you correct information that PVL was overseeing things.
I know you don’t like correct information, but you should have paid more attention and taken that as a scoop.
 
Last edited:
The football hasn't started and they are still on the board, well hopefully not for long even their own members can't stand their guts.

It's our hope to get rid of them once and for all to never give them another chance to meddle with our club well that's what we're praying for that the next lot have more brains.

Is this not the right thread to discuss it, there's is nothing stopping you discussing football in the other threads.
No news is good news.
 
No news in 4 weeks and it has since been confirmed that PVL will be keeping a close eye on things, so it could be change for the better in that time.
4 weeks? Omg wow!!

that means that everyone just forgets that HBG sacked 4 independent directors after our best year on and off the field in years.

Move along everyone.. Theres nothing to follow here.. in just 4 weeks they have turned the whole club around

Trott on
 
Nothing has happened to say that is not true.
Surely even you can see we now have a much young and more enthusiastic CEO.
Stop deflecting pal, this has nothing to do with our current CEO

You called Richo and his family criminals.

What's your latest factual scoop on that?

So just because theres no proof its not true, does it mean is true? What a joke.
 
Mate , seriously that screams year 11 drama class to me . And whilst I’ll take your word for it, that it’s factual , we are talking about 55-70 year old men and women here .(I’m not diminishing your wife’s experience . Just the toxicity and absurdity of the whole situation).
The fact that that is a cultural thing , that has only been removed because a certain other faction of debenture holders have usurped the apparent “bad” ones, is indicative of how much of a rot has set in . And the fact you’re defending it , means you’re not impartial either .
It screams power struggle to all of us . You say bullying , ok , that could easily be reframed as extreme dislike .
This is what people are opposing . Your story , just reinforces how the whole thing needs to be torpedoed (sold off) . The fact 1 bloke can pass away and , you’re talking about really 200 000 people put through 14 years of torture because of it … do you not see the issue?
The workplace can be worse than the playground for bullying.
 
Why did he have to make his instagram private? Are you offended by seeing legal age ladies in a swimsuit?
Do you honestly believe that when someone represents a company as a director, its a good look to publicly follow young girls who sell their bodies online?

Imagine if it was Richo the extreme bias the other way we'd be hearing from old mates on this forum and the Facebook groups.

Cmon man... any credibility you gain with decent points, you lose with bias like this.
 
Last edited:
I would have thought it being a new year with no board issues to report over the past 4 or so weeks and recent information that suggests the HBG decision making will be strictly monitored by PVL would mean we could stop focusing on the board and start focusing on the rugby league for a while ?
Are some people more fascinated with the board than they are of the rugby league team ?

Maybe some are, though it is at least somewhat fair to do so, as the biggest decisions and directions, especially on funding are made and set by them. The fact that the league feels the need for special monitoring also gives reason to be concerned.
 
Do you honestly believe that when someone represents a company as a director, its a good look to publicly follow young girls who sell their bodies online?

Imagine if it was Richo the extreme bias the other way we'd be hearing from old mates on this forum and the Facebook groups.

Cmon man... any credibility you gain with decent points, you lose with bias like this.
I hope these young girls are not following the person in question who may or may not be wearing a magpie g string.
 
Ever heard of David Koresh? One man convinced 120 people he was god.

Influence is a strong thing.
Ok. I don't want people weak-minded enough to submit to a cult as our leaders either.

HBG, only a month ago, showed they have no idea how to run anything. They have set our recruitment back years. If we strip that one brain explosion out by itself, that's enough to warrant this action against them. Let alone the rest of the well-documented history.

On the report that was "commissioned by the two individuals". It was still apparently confirmed by the entire board.... let's even say Barnier was a questionable choice for it, what was actually wrong with the report? To everyone who understands proper corporate governance and our history of failure driven by HBG, the report seemed to land on an appropriate new governance structure.

These blokes in HBG are custodians of the club. Nothing more. They should want what is best for it, not governed by their own egos or desires. If that had been demonstrated to all of us, then they wouldn't have all this action against them. Even come out of the shadows and bloody well talk to people. Not hide behind their CEO or media leaks.

We heard more from the WT independent directors in their 9 months than we have out of HBG board members in 2 decades!!

Your defence of them is outstanding, and you put up a good argument. I can tell you're a smart guy. But you're glossing over some pretty key facts.

From the outside looking in, these guys are inexperienced, unaccountable, easily manipulated and driven by their own self-interests. If they aren't that way, then they should be out there fronting members to change the perception that they themselves have created.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top