2010 NRL Premiership ODDS....

[Geo]

http://www.tab.com.au/Sports/Betting/PlaceFixedOddsBet.aspx?State=2&LocationCode=1&Competition=602&MarketCode=52&MeetingType=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
**2010 NRL Premiership**
Parramatta ….....6.00
Bulldogs .........7.00
Melbourne ...... 7.50
St George Illawarra ...... 8.00
Gold Coast ....... 11.00
Manly ...... 11.00
Wests Tigers ........ 13.00
Brisbane ....... 15.00
South Sydney ....... 15.00
Penrith ....... 21.00
Sydney Roosters ...... 21.00
Newcastle ......... 26.00
North Queensland ...... 26.00
Canberra ........34.00
NZ Warriors....... 34.00
Cronulla ........ 41.00

Geez........Ahead of the Broncos........

**Top 4 2010**
Brisbane ...... 4.25
Bulldogs .....2.10
Canberra ...... 7.50
Manly ......2.85
Melbourne ....... 2.50
Newcastle ....... 5.00
NZ Warriors ...... 7.50
North Queensland ..... 7.00
Parramatta ....... 1.85
Penrith ...... 5.50
St George Illawarra.... 2.40
Cronulla ...... 9.00
South Sydney ...... 3.75
Sydney Roosters..... 6.00
Wests Tigers ..... 3.50
Gold Coast ..... 2.50

**Top 8 2010**
Brisbane ..... 1.80
Bulldogs ..... 1.33
Canberra ..... 2.65
Manly .....1.55
Melbourne ..... 1.40
Newcastle..... 2.15
NZ Warriors ..... 2.75
North Queensland ..... 2.60
Parramatta ..... 1.25
Penrith ..... 2.25
St George Illawarra..... 1.40
Cronulla .....3.00
South Sydney ..... 1.80
Sydney Roosters ..... 2.50
Wests Tigers ..... 1.75
Gold Coast .....1.40

 

[Joel Helmes]

Looks about right.

 

[Guest]

Every expert out there is aware the Tigers have a stronger squad for 2010, particularly when it comes to depth. Those odds look fair in light of that.

 

[Kul]

These are very strong odds!

It shows that the bookies are respecting our chances next year. We are grouped in the "just short to the top" position, the position that teams like Brisbane and Melbourne are almost always assured.
People… GET EXCITED!

 

[Spartan117]

Looks about on the money.

Dogs to do worse IMO

Sharks to continue dreadful run - Inside mail is injury and depth to be an issue 2010

 

[fergiefurr]

we wont be sneaking under the radar in 2010.

realistically we were the 2nd or 3rd best team in the final 8-10 weeks of the comp.

all the 'experts' have us in their 8 for next year, finally there is no place to hide. a poor season will be very heavily scrutinized

 

[tigergirlz]

2010 - Year of the Tiger!!

 

[Footy_Head_Goodness]

Looks about on the money.

Dogs to do worse IMO

Sharks to continue dreadful run - Inside mail is injury and depth to be an issue 2010

ahhhh hahaha….inside mail that the Sharks might have trouble with depth in 2010\. Solid call.

My inside mail is that Santa might appear in shopping malls wearing red this Christmas. No really....red!

 

[Footy_Head_Goodness]

Not many teams look value to me. Especially the Tigers at $13\. Come on guys! In all seriousness we should be:
$2.50 to make the 8
$6.00 to make the 4
$26.00 to win the comp

 

[quintus]

Not many teams look value to me. Especially the Tigers at $13\. Come on guys! In all seriousness we should be:
$2.50 to make the 8
$6.00 to make the 4
$26.00 to win the comp

By your reckoning we should come third or fourth last with no chance of the play-offs. I can tell that you are a very astute judge of betting odds. Thanks for the tip. :unamused:

 

[Adrian]

nukes are spoonbait

 

[benjibrotown]

If you are thinking of betting on tigers to in the comp take your money to Centrebet were you can get $16

 

[AmericanHistoryX]

I think its safe to say that the bookies are anticipating a Tuqiri signing somewhere along the line.

 

[Geo]

nukes are spoonbait

I'd say they could go either way depends what happens as Wicksgate continues to unfold…......

Spoon betting has been suspended pending futher investigation into Wicks allegedly supplying players.......

 

[Poppa]

Someone is expecting WT to do well in 2010 if the pre season betting is any guide.Maybe this our year..
\
\
:supporter: :supporter: 😛ray: 😛ray:

 

[Footy_Head_Goodness]

Not many teams look value to me. Especially the Tigers at $13\. Come on guys! In all seriousness we should be:
$2.50 to make the 8
$6.00 to make the 4
$26.00 to win the comp

By your reckoning we should come third or fourth last with no chance of the play-offs. I can tell that you are a very astute judge of betting odds. Thanks for the tip. :unamused:

Nope….what I quite clearly said was that not many teams look value. Therefore, if they trimmed significantly then all others can drift and in my opinion some should drift significantly. So if all drifted and 1 or 2 blew out then we would be about 10th/11th meaning 6th or 7th last. Give me a buzz on this topic when you are ready to back the tigers at the current tote and ill happily take your $1,000 and pay you out if we win the comp.

 

[citizen_cub]

that is a fair estimate IMO. i'm just a little baffled why so many people are favouring parramatta. they had a good run but i'm really not sure about a team with it's capabilites and when you look at them on paper i can't note many " superstars ". now don't mistake me for thinking their run was a fluke 'cause it wasn't. they've got a genius full back in hayne. burt is crap, while grothe is 'solid'. tahu is past it and i doubt playing union for 2 seasons is gonna help him. mortimer is another 'solid' player. robson is totally overrated. cayless makes hardly ANY impact with hit ups. keating has got a bright future. moi moi is the stand out in the fowards there. hindmarsh works his backside off but i don't think he has the same impact as better back rowers in the game. mateo came back well from injury.

on paper, we could KILL this team, it justs really depends whether they get a role on

tigers look like we have everything going for us next year

 

[quintus]

Not many teams look value to me. Especially the Tigers at $13\. Come on guys! In all seriousness we should be:
$2.50 to make the 8
$6.00 to make the 4
$26.00 to win the comp

By your reckoning we should come third or fourth last with no chance of the play-offs. I can tell that you are a very astute judge of betting odds. Thanks for the tip. :unamused:

Therefore, if they trimmed significantly then all others can drift and in my opinion some should drift significantly. So if all drifted and 1 or 2 blew out then we would be about 10th/11th meaning 6th or 7th last.

What code do I use to decipher all that rubbish above that you have just added to your original statement. If you are game enough to give me odds of 26/1 against Wests Tigers winning the competition then I will gladly take you on for $1000 (as you suggested). The only proviso that I will make is that the bank cheques are held by a trustworthy third party agreed to by both of us before the first premiership game is played. None of this behind the scene nonsense for me I like everything up front.

 

[Buckets_of_blood]

Looks about on the money.

Dogs to do worse IMO

Sharks to continue dreadful run - Inside mail is injury and depth to be an issue 2010

How can you have 'inside mail' about injury being an issue?

:laughing: :laughing:

 

[Spartan117]

RISK Analysis.

It's a thing most business' do.

Metrics were defined highlighting potential coverage / deficiences and having them addressed via recruitment (short term) or Development (Med-Long Term).

Put simply, it's like we do here " Who is Robbies Back up?" and "This Guy can play X,Y,Z positions"…...