Tigerdave
Well-known member
Kinda surprised Bennett is going to the Bunnies given Richardson is a bit of a control freak, but only 2 years? Kinda glad we didn't pick him up then if that's all he's looking for.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:@ said:OK had a look at the transfers in and out under Maguire out Souths
2013
Lima
Teo
Goodwin
Beau Champion
T Burgess
2014
G Stewart
T Grant
C Walker
2015-16
N Brown
P Carter
D Cook
Sam back
D Nielsen
17
Farah
R Jennings
Rochow
Fuimaono
\
\
Lots have transferred in , not many have stayed bar Cook ,Jennings and Sammy Burgess
A good marker would be someone like Fuimaono , remains unsigned for 2019 …..
Wonder what Robbie Rochow /Farah thinks ............... ??
Did he sign McQueen?
@ said:@ said:@ said:OK had a look at the transfers in and out under Maguire out Souths
2013
Lima
Teo
Goodwin
Beau Champion
T Burgess
2014
G Stewart
T Grant
C Walker
2015-16
N Brown
P Carter
D Cook
Sam back
D Nielsen
17
Farah
R Jennings
Rochow
Fuimaono
\
\
Lots have transferred in , not many have stayed bar Cook ,Jennings and Sammy Burgess
A good marker would be someone like Fuimaono , remains unsigned for 2019 …..
Wonder what Robbie Rochow /Farah thinks ............... ??
Did he sign McQueen?
Don't think so , must have signed the year before and left in 2015 for Titans
@ said:Souths will pay 400k for Bennett next year as Brisbane will pay the difference 600k between Seibolds current deal 400k and Wayne’s current deal 1m for next year only.
We will pay 700k for Madge with Panthers paying the difference between Clearys current deal 500k and Madge’s deal 700k for two years. Compensation will be 400k. Which drops Maguire down to 500k per season for the first two years of his deal.
@ said:Tigers come to terms with Maguire on three-year, $2.5 million deal
By Adrian Proszenko 25 October 2018 — 6:02pm
Tigers officials believe Maguire is a better long-term proposition than Bennett, who wouldn’t have been considered for a deal any longer than two seasons. Given the constant changing of clipboard holders at the club – Cleary will be the latest to move on in quick succession following the departures of Jason Taylor, Mick Potter and Tim Sheens – the Tigers hierarchy was keen to lock in a big-name coach for an extended period to provide stability.
@ said:Souths will pay 400k for Bennett next year as Brisbane will pay the difference 600k between Seibolds current deal 400k and Wayne’s current deal 1m for next year only.
We will pay 700k for Madge with Panthers paying the difference between Clearys current deal 500k and Madge’s deal 700k for two years. Compensation will be 400k. Which drops Maguire down to 500k per season for the first two years of his deal.
@ said:So really Cleary is still here next year, correct. Maguires signing pends on Cleary’s departure. That’s how I read it.
@ said:Kinda surprised Bennett is going to the Bunnies given Richardson is a bit of a control freak, but only 2 years? Kinda glad we didn't pick him up then if that's all he's looking for.
@ said:@ said:Tigers come to terms with Maguire on three-year, $2.5 million deal
By Adrian Proszenko 25 October 2018 — 6:02pm
Tigers officials believe Maguire is a better long-term proposition than Bennett, who wouldn’t have been considered for a deal any longer than two seasons. Given the constant changing of clipboard holders at the club – Cleary will be the latest to move on in quick succession following the departures of Jason Taylor, Mick Potter and Tim Sheens – the Tigers hierarchy was keen to lock in a big-name coach for an extended period to provide stability.
I think the quote would be exactly opposite if we got Bennett.
"Maguire was a good back-up plan, but the club always a proven premiership winner like Bennett."
@ said:Disappointed about Bennett, but that was really only ever going to be a short term arrangement if it had come to fruition. Madge hopefully coaches us for a decade. Good pick up. Credit to Pascoe.
@ said:@ said:Tigers come to terms with Maguire on three-year, $2.5 million deal
By Adrian Proszenko 25 October 2018 — 6:02pm
Tigers officials believe Maguire is a better long-term proposition than Bennett, who wouldn’t have been considered for a deal any longer than two seasons. Given the constant changing of clipboard holders at the club – Cleary will be the latest to move on in quick succession following the departures of Jason Taylor, Mick Potter and Tim Sheens – the Tigers hierarchy was keen to lock in a big-name coach for an extended period to provide stability.
I think the quote would be exactly opposite if we got Bennett.
"Maguire was a good back-up plan, but the club always a proven premiership winner like Bennett."
@ said:@ said:Disappointed about Bennett, but that was really only ever going to be a short term arrangement if it had come to fruition. Madge hopefully coaches us for a decade. Good pick up. Credit to Pascoe.
This is a very disappointing outcome. I have to say I expected more from our Board.
@ said:@ said:@ said:Disappointed about Bennett, but that was really only ever going to be a short term arrangement if it had come to fruition. Madge hopefully coaches us for a decade. Good pick up. Credit to Pascoe.
This is a very disappointing outcome. I have to say I expected more from our Board.
They can't force people to come here
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Disappointed about Bennett, but that was really only ever going to be a short term arrangement if it had come to fruition. Madge hopefully coaches us for a decade. Good pick up. Credit to Pascoe.
This is a very disappointing outcome. I have to say I expected more from our Board.
They can't force people to come here
There were other options than Maguire. They've been mentioned in an earlier page.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:This is a very disappointing outcome. I have to say I expected more from our Board.
They can't force people to come here
There were other options than Maguire. They've been mentioned in an earlier page.
Yeah sorry
Thought that comment was out of character for you
Thought you were talking about Bennett
Who would you of preferred