balmain boy
Well-known member
@jirskyr said in [All good at the club says Chairman](/post/1452983) said:I like to visit these threads and see people get triggered by Lee. He was actually fairly moderate in this one - acknowledging the failures and supporting his senior management. Nothing weird or out-there about that.
But people still getting triggered. If Pascoe or Hartigan aren't fronting the media, nor Sheens, and it's only Madge doing most of the talking, who is going to field the questions on behalf of club management, if not Lee? That's part of his role.
If Pascoe comes out and makes the same comments, another group again gets triggered by Pascoe and starts ranting about haircuts and stubble.
No, actually what he said was very insulting to the club and it's members. He's embarrassing himself and potential the club.
He's basically said that regardless of how poorly key staff members perform they are guaranteed job security. That should never be the case, in any organisation. There has to be a line.
Sure we can offer support and not knee jerk reactions. But the board, CEO, and most of our playing staff have failed for many, many years in a row now. They can have no job security. Did he need to mention anything? Other than we'll conduct a thorough review of our performance at the end of teh season, like we do every year, and make decisions accordingly to give us the best chance of success moving forwards etc.
How many other chairmen are regularly interviewed in the media? None. Maybe 1 here or there. Lee wants to be a celebrity. He wants to hang with the cool kids. He may have money but he doesn't necessarily have our best intentions at heart. He's an egomaniac looking for new ways to feed his ego.