Viking Warrior
Well-known member
@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509849) said:A few…lol
A lot of its commen sence tbh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509849) said:A few…lol
@viking-warrior said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509858) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509849) said:A few…lol
A lot of its commen sence tbh
@gnr4life said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509859) said:@viking-warrior said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509858) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509849) said:A few…lol
A lot of its commen sence tbh
And most of it hasn’t been an issue. Things like violence, nudity, and talk of illegal activity. I think most posters are more classy than that. At the end of the day, people have to stop taking disagreements so personally.
@tcl said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509863) said:Scrap banning except for two reasons, it just creates rubbish. Sin bin naughty posters, 1 week for 1st offence, 2 for 2, 3 for 3, max out at 4 for every offence after 4. Only ban new accounts created by those while in the sin bin but, allow them to come back when the original sin bin ends and ban those that are intentionally spamming, swearing at other poster, racist, sexist or flaking out like we experienced recently.
Not a fan of those creating new accounts with an intent to get back at another member or just to be a dick. Sometimes obvious sometimes not so. Given a new leaf has been turned I hope that crap stops.
Swearing I don’t have a problem with it as long as it’s not at another poster and in context. “Your a ……….” 👎🏼, “the refs a …….” 👍. Not the c word (I learnt that early) and not a combination of swear words that are just plain wrong. I know some a concerned about woman and children, the ladies chose to be here and may choose to ignore or contribute. Children, let’s let their parents, parent. If we know a child or lady are present or involved in a discussion then show common decency and mind your language.
Sorry to see @willow and @cochise go down like that, enjoyed both their contributions as posters and mods, we didn’t always agree but we avoided arguments. Was always going to end in tears and for what it’s worth right or wrong all played their part. Time will tell if it was a good decision or not. Enough about that.
Apologies for the long post, been sitting on this for a while and it’s my second attempt tonight to post this failed the first time so had to retype.
@chicken_faced_killa said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509865) said:@tcl said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509863) said:Scrap banning except for two reasons, it just creates rubbish. Sin bin naughty posters, 1 week for 1st offence, 2 for 2, 3 for 3, max out at 4 for every offence after 4. Only ban new accounts created by those while in the sin bin but, allow them to come back when the original sin bin ends and ban those that are intentionally spamming, swearing at other poster, racist, sexist or flaking out like we experienced recently.
Not a fan of those creating new accounts with an intent to get back at another member or just to be a dick. Sometimes obvious sometimes not so. Given a new leaf has been turned I hope that crap stops.
Swearing I don’t have a problem with it as long as it’s not at another poster and in context. “Your a ……….” ??, “the refs a …….” ?. Not the c word (I learnt that early) and not a combination of swear words that are just plain wrong. I know some a concerned about woman and children, the ladies chose to be here and may choose to ignore or contribute. Children, let’s let their parents, parent. If we know a child or lady are present or involved in a discussion then show common decency and mind your language.
Sorry to see @willow and @cochise go down like that, enjoyed both their contributions as posters and mods, we didn’t always agree but we avoided arguments. Was always going to end in tears and for what it’s worth right or wrong all played their part. Time will tell if it was a good decision or not. Enough about that.
Apologies for the long post, been sitting on this for a while and it’s my second attempt tonight to post this failed the first time so had to retype.
Agree with all of this. I would also say that after a year away people should have the opportunity to come back and shown they have grown.
The biggest issue seems to be what different people find offensive. **I think we have to take the approach we do in society and speak with different posters in different ways.**
@mike said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509845) said:Hate speech or discrimination
@macdougall said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509789) said:@jirskyr said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509719) said:@macdougall said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509243) said:@jirskyr said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1508898) said:I'm still trying to figure out who argues with mods and why they would do this. I've been here 17 years, never banned, never had a fight with a mod. I'm not clear why it's hard for some folks; you don't have to do much to stay in the good books and still offer your opinion.
And now there's this fairly pathetic chest beating going on in this thread, about topics I really don't understand, but it's ugly.
I got put on mod preview once and I messaged Willow and was like "hey Willow mod preview sucks can you just undo it and if I ever do anything wrong again you can just ban me" and he agreed and removed the mod preview. Willow was alright at times but the dude had hectic high school teacher vibes that just attracted and encouraged people to take issue with his authority (and created a clique of sycophants that made the forum eye rollingly cringe at times).
Never ever had a clash with willow... again, it shouldn't be that hard to navigate around people.
Pretty hard to navigate around a mod that had so much time on his hands he'd police you when you use common terms like wtf. I dunno bout you but as a grown ass man on a footy forum I'd prefer to be able to talk like I do with anyone else. Sure if this was a primary school it might be different.
@tigerbalm said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509744) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509736) said:@jirskyr said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509716) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509238) said:So the question to the forum would be is that now acceptable…?
The actual question is - is someone actually asking the rest of us what should be acceptable, or is kul just making the decision alone?
Well we have asked that of @kul and have had no response… so as it appears it’s up to the community.. I’m asking what is now acceptable and what is not.. as in what goes and what doesn’t…?
**No** racist
**No** hom*phobic slurs
**No** doxing
If we are worried that a 3 year old tigers fan may stumble on the site, add some *** to naughty words if you must but that's naïve.
Topics are a rough guide but a thread is allowed to play out.
Mods are to enforce the No's above, not their opinions.
@wagga_tiger said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509811) said:Respect, simple respect for each other. Opinions differ and that’s cool because we can all learn something by listening to others but telling people to “jog on” or that “ you’re off your head” when you don’t agree is not needed.
@mike said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509845) said:@demps said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509738) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509736) said:@jirskyr said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509716) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509238) said:So the question to the forum would be is that now acceptable…?
The actual question is - is someone actually asking the rest of us what should be acceptable, or is kul just making the decision alone?
Well we have asked that of @kul and have had no response… so as it appears it’s up to the community.. I’m asking what is now acceptable and what is not.. as in what goes and what doesn’t…?
? Racism
? Weird sexual posting
? threats of violence towards users
Pretty simple.
I’ll add a few..
? Objectification of women or other genders
? Bullying, harassment, insulting or personal attacks
? Posting of copyright or licensed material without permission
? Spam or advertising
? Flaming (similar to bullying)
? Shotgun posting (same question across several threads)
? No hijacking of threads attempting to change the focus of the thread
? Illegal activity or discussion of illegal activity
? Sexual content or nudity
? Hacking the site, malware or exploits
? Multiple usernames (sockpuppets)
? SHOUTING
? Threaten lawsuits or other legal action
? Hate speech or discrimination
? Gratuitously violent content
? Gratuitous swearing, it’s a family and inclusive site (or at least it should be)
@strongee said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509891) said:@tigerbalm said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509744) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509736) said:@jirskyr said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509716) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509238) said:So the question to the forum would be is that now acceptable…?
The actual question is - is someone actually asking the rest of us what should be acceptable, or is kul just making the decision alone?
Well we have asked that of @kul and have had no response… so as it appears it’s up to the community.. I’m asking what is now acceptable and what is not.. as in what goes and what doesn’t…?
**No** racist
**No** hom*phobic slurs
**No** doxing
If we are worried that a 3 year old tigers fan may stumble on the site, add some *** to naughty words if you must but that's naïve.
Topics are a rough guide but a thread is allowed to play out.
Mods are to enforce the No's above, not their opinions.
What’s doxing ? Is that revealing people’s real names ?
@strongee said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509891) said:@tigerbalm said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509744) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509736) said:@jirskyr said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509716) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509238) said:So the question to the forum would be is that now acceptable…?
The actual question is - is someone actually asking the rest of us what should be acceptable, or is kul just making the decision alone?
Well we have asked that of @kul and have had no response… so as it appears it’s up to the community.. I’m asking what is now acceptable and what is not.. as in what goes and what doesn’t…?
**No** racist
**No** hom*phobic slurs
**No** doxing
If we are worried that a 3 year old tigers fan may stumble on the site, add some *** to naughty words if you must but that's naïve.
Topics are a rough guide but a thread is allowed to play out.
Mods are to enforce the No's above, not their opinions.
What’s doxing ? Is that revealing people’s real names ?
@hobbo1 said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509919) said:My name is Mike Hunt
@magpies1963 said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509896) said:@mike said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509845) said:@demps said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509738) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509736) said:@jirskyr said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509716) said:@geo said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509238) said:So the question to the forum would be is that now acceptable…?
The actual question is - is someone actually asking the rest of us what should be acceptable, or is kul just making the decision alone?
Well we have asked that of @kul and have had no response… so as it appears it’s up to the community.. I’m asking what is now acceptable and what is not.. as in what goes and what doesn’t…?
? Racism
? Weird sexual posting
? threats of violence towards users
Pretty simple.
I’ll add a few..
? Objectification of women or other genders
? Bullying, harassment, insulting or personal attacks
? Posting of copyright or licensed material without permission
? Spam or advertising
? Flaming (similar to bullying)
? Shotgun posting (same question across several threads)
? No hijacking of threads attempting to change the focus of the thread
? Illegal activity or discussion of illegal activity
? Sexual content or nudity
? Hacking the site, malware or exploits
? Multiple usernames (sockpuppets)
? SHOUTING
? Threaten lawsuits or other legal action
? Hate speech or discrimination
? Gratuitously violent content
? Gratuitous swearing, it’s a family and inclusive site (or at least it should be)
Congratulations @mike The best post so far by 100 miles.
If Mike was to become a Mod on Wests Tigers Forum, I am absolutely certain he would lead us down the rite path to becoming "a Family and inclusive site" with no need for 'should be'.
@hobbo1 said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509919) said:My name is Mike Hunt
@king_sirro said in [Another Quick Forum Update](/post/1509938) said:Noticed my last log into this site was 2018. I stood down as a mod and removed myself from this site back then. I found myself losing patience with style of posting from many users to the point I let loose one day which led to me pulling the pin. That meltdown (embarrassing meltdown), was a result of built up angst in relation to many things. Removing myself from posting was the best thing I've done. Now that says it all really, and IMO shows the forum has been going downhill for years. I have since visited the forum as a guest to check in on any possible rumours, and nothing has inspired me to get back into posting regularly, its sad.
Now I believe there isn't any singular reason for this downward spiral of the forum, and it will be near impossible to turn around as a result.
The removal of Willow and cochise is an interesting move. Cochise wasn't a mod back when I was, so from a casual viewpoint, his style of moderating didn't seem to be issue to me. Repeating his opinions way too much was annoying, but that's hardly an issue.
Willow is without doubt the hardest working mod. Was his style the right way to go? Not my cup of tea to be honest. I certainly see why many would be happy he is gone. It will be interesting to see if his hard work will be missed. While I don't agree with how Willow would use his power in certain circumstances, I admire the work he put in and how he wanted this place to be.
Most long term users appear to be of the same opinion that the forum is nothing compared to what it used to be.
How to fix it? Wish I knew.