Any chance there might be a new signing soon

Reading the above posts, I guess we will see Choc in some coaching role at the Eels,his wife in the back office,his mother doing the flowers in the leagues club,his dad on some consultants role and his kids doing adds for the Eels, all on massive contracts!!!!!
 
The funniest part in all this for me… they have been absolutely diabolical in those years they have been over the cap bar this year. I cannot fathom or understand how one club can go over the cap with the rosters they had. As for players I wouldn't mind Kelepi but I don't think he would be coming as he might not be In the top 25
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
@swag tiger said:
We could go for Norman or Jennings. :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Or we could take both. Easy, just put em on back ended contracts :laughing:
Maybe we can get Tagatese, he'd love to play for Taylor :roll
 
@2041 said:
@Goose said:
Be interesting to see how they go about it.

If it is deemed that Watmough will never play again, they only have to pay 25% of his contract (in real terms) and get a (part) salary cap exemption. So declaring him medically unfit does relieve that pressure, however if Choc wants to contest he is fit, than he gets the remaining 2 years pay, so he will try and get back, even for a single lower grade game (very similar to Yow Yeh).

If they flick one highly paid player, that can solve it in 1 hit. The anwser would be Scott, someone would pay full price, they cant meke the finals this year anyway and next year was probably his last, least long term pain, and the problem is solved.

The other option is releasing a number of mid range players, but every time they do that another player enter the top 25, so dropping a $100k player only frees up $20k of space assuming the replacement is on league minimum. So they have to drop 5-8 players if that is there strategy.

Left field option is basically say stuff them, not clear the books for this year, and play for no points, and work to fix it for next year and beyond.

I'd say letting Norman go early might be the best of a bunch of bad options - he's probably gone at the end of this year anyway now they aren't going to be able to cheat on the cap in 2017, and realistically the finals are probably gone this year. I just can't see Parra playing for no points for more than a game or two - they'll have to get this money cleared in the next couple of weeks. The issue of course is that if Norman goes they won't have any halves at all given the Foran situation but, again, if they're punting 2016 at least this way they will go into 2017 with more or less the squad they ought to have expected.

I also just read that even if Watmough retires now Parra will only be able to pro-rate the cap adjustment. I'm not sure exactly how that works but if it's as simple as proportion of the season played that means they're stuck with a third of the $700,000 for the amount of the season Watmough's been on the roster - so a saving of $470,000\. Add in the minimum salary player they'll have to add to the squad and they'll still need to find roughly $200,000 reduction for this season…

It was rumoured Scott signed for as little as 350k, so given we're already over a third of the way through the year they really woudn't free up much space with him.

Norman to the Roosters/Dragons/Titans seems like the best bet to me. Least disruption and with Foran back in say a month they'd still have a dominant half to guide the team around and some kid gets a chance in the halves in the meantime.

Will be a lot of shuffling going on over the next few weeks
 
Most NRL clubs are greedy and if they can find secret money from their sponsors, would do anything to gain an edge over their opponents.
 
@jirskyr said:
@Nelson said:
The dud Watmough signing has really stuffed them up. They only signed him last year as a marquee 2nd rower and they had to re-enter that market this year for another marquee 2nd rower in Beau Scott to fill the role Watmough was supposed to.

No they didn't have to re-enter the market for another marquee. Like the compliant clubs, if they stuffed up a signing, they were supposed to cop it sweet and bide their time, not go straight back out into the market and buy another high-priced player.

Well obviously no they didn't have to cheat but the Watmough situation made it obvious that they were. Usually when a dud signing like that is made a club is saddled with it for years like we were with Blair yet here they were rectifying the problem within 12 months with a similar signing that actually paid off in terms of performance…and backfired in terms of getting them exposed as cheats.
 
@Balmain Boy said:
@2041 said:
@Goose said:
Be interesting to see how they go about it.

If it is deemed that Watmough will never play again, they only have to pay 25% of his contract (in real terms) and get a (part) salary cap exemption. So declaring him medically unfit does relieve that pressure, however if Choc wants to contest he is fit, than he gets the remaining 2 years pay, so he will try and get back, even for a single lower grade game (very similar to Yow Yeh).

If they flick one highly paid player, that can solve it in 1 hit. The anwser would be Scott, someone would pay full price, they cant meke the finals this year anyway and next year was probably his last, least long term pain, and the problem is solved.

The other option is releasing a number of mid range players, but every time they do that another player enter the top 25, so dropping a $100k player only frees up $20k of space assuming the replacement is on league minimum. So they have to drop 5-8 players if that is there strategy.

Left field option is basically say stuff them, not clear the books for this year, and play for no points, and work to fix it for next year and beyond.

I'd say letting Norman go early might be the best of a bunch of bad options - he's probably gone at the end of this year anyway now they aren't going to be able to cheat on the cap in 2017, and realistically the finals are probably gone this year. I just can't see Parra playing for no points for more than a game or two - they'll have to get this money cleared in the next couple of weeks. The issue of course is that if Norman goes they won't have any halves at all given the Foran situation but, again, if they're punting 2016 at least this way they will go into 2017 with more or less the squad they ought to have expected.

I also just read that even if Watmough retires now Parra will only be able to pro-rate the cap adjustment. I'm not sure exactly how that works but if it's as simple as proportion of the season played that means they're stuck with a third of the $700,000 for the amount of the season Watmough's been on the roster - so a saving of $470,000\. Add in the minimum salary player they'll have to add to the squad and they'll still need to find roughly $200,000 reduction for this season…

It was rumoured Scott signed for as little as 350k, so given we're already over a third of the way through the year they really woudn't free up much space with him.

Norman to the Roosters/Dragons/Titans seems like the best bet to me. Least disruption and with Foran back in say a month they'd still have a dominant half to guide the team around and some kid gets a chance in the halves in the meantime.

Will be a lot of shuffling going on over the next few weeks

I just assumed Scott was on big coin, I havent really heard, if he is not, well that is not the answer.

If they flick Normon, Im not sure who they bring into the halves, the 2 kids that were promising, (Matterson and Docker Clay) have been moved on, just trying to think who plays NYC and NSW cup and cant for life of me recall.

Watmough is under no obligation to retire, and the eels can medically retire him, only 25% counts,interesting to see what arrangement they come to on that one.

WOnder if the NRL will take their spoons off them!
 
@Goose said:
@Balmain Boy said:
@2041 said:
@Goose said:
Be interesting to see how they go about it.

If it is deemed that Watmough will never play again, they only have to pay 25% of his contract (in real terms) and get a (part) salary cap exemption. So declaring him medically unfit does relieve that pressure, however if Choc wants to contest he is fit, than he gets the remaining 2 years pay, so he will try and get back, even for a single lower grade game (very similar to Yow Yeh).

If they flick one highly paid player, that can solve it in 1 hit. The anwser would be Scott, someone would pay full price, they cant meke the finals this year anyway and next year was probably his last, least long term pain, and the problem is solved.

The other option is releasing a number of mid range players, but every time they do that another player enter the top 25, so dropping a $100k player only frees up $20k of space assuming the replacement is on league minimum. So they have to drop 5-8 players if that is there strategy.

Left field option is basically say stuff them, not clear the books for this year, and play for no points, and work to fix it for next year and beyond.

I'd say letting Norman go early might be the best of a bunch of bad options - he's probably gone at the end of this year anyway now they aren't going to be able to cheat on the cap in 2017, and realistically the finals are probably gone this year. I just can't see Parra playing for no points for more than a game or two - they'll have to get this money cleared in the next couple of weeks. The issue of course is that if Norman goes they won't have any halves at all given the Foran situation but, again, if they're punting 2016 at least this way they will go into 2017 with more or less the squad they ought to have expected.

I also just read that even if Watmough retires now Parra will only be able to pro-rate the cap adjustment. I'm not sure exactly how that works but if it's as simple as proportion of the season played that means they're stuck with a third of the $700,000 for the amount of the season Watmough's been on the roster - so a saving of $470,000\. Add in the minimum salary player they'll have to add to the squad and they'll still need to find roughly $200,000 reduction for this season…

It was rumoured Scott signed for as little as 350k, so given we're already over a third of the way through the year they really woudn't free up much space with him.

Norman to the Roosters/Dragons/Titans seems like the best bet to me. Least disruption and with Foran back in say a month they'd still have a dominant half to guide the team around and some kid gets a chance in the halves in the meantime.

Will be a lot of shuffling going on over the next few weeks

I just assumed Scott was on big coin, I havent really heard, if he is not, well that is not the answer.

If they flick Normon, Im not sure who they bring into the halves, the 2 kids that were promising, (Matterson and Docker Clay) have been moved on, just trying to think who plays NYC and NSW cup and cant for life of me recall.

Watmough is under no obligation to retire, and the eels can medically retire him, only 25% counts,interesting to see what arrangement they come to on that one.

WOnder if the NRL will take their spoons off them!

They signed Mitch Cornish from the Raiders who has some first grade experience. They also have that scrub Luke Kelly although I think he's out for the season. Takairangi did a job for them at 5/8 last week too.
 
@swag tiger said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
@swag tiger said:
We could go for Norman or Jennings. :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Or we could take both. Easy, just put em on back ended contracts :laughing:
Maybe we can get Tagatese, he'd love to play for Taylor :roll

And we may have Enough money to get sharapova and use her as a hooker. :roll :laughing:

We can add you to the list of mascots for women in league round alongside Greg Bird, Greg Inglis, Robert Lui, Anthony Watmough and Kirisome Auva'a.
 
Norman would be top of list but out of our price range.

Takairangi would be a welcome addition but Taylor did not want him first time around. Why????
 
I think more than anything, this club needs some quality signings off the field rather than on it. People who will make the cultural changes etc

who we sign on the field to me seems like sort of myopic thinking.

Just like the NBA; Masai ujiri, Bob Myers; RC Buford, Rich Cho etc etc
 
Our cap is an issue but purely for the brain exercise….

3.Norman
2\. Daylight
1\. Gordon, purely as an excellent goal kicker but more than handy winger/fb
0\. Jennings if rooters still paying most of his salary
Maybe Scott on the cheap
 
@swag tiger said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
@swag tiger said:
We could go for Norman or Jennings. :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Or we could take both. Easy, just put em on back ended contracts :laughing:
Maybe we can get Tagatese, he'd love to play for Taylor :roll

And we may have Enough money to get sharapova and use her as a hooker. :roll :laughing:

Look, Swaggy, I've defended you in the past because of your age but you should steer clear of posts demeaning to women. This isn't a blokes only forum.
 
@sideline eye said:
@swag tiger said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
@swag tiger said:
We could go for Norman or Jennings. :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

Or we could take both. Easy, just put em on back ended contracts :laughing:
Maybe we can get Tagatese, he'd love to play for Taylor :roll

And we may have Enough money to get sharapova and use her as a hooker. :roll :laughing:

Look, Swaggy, I've defended you in the past because of your age but you should steer clear of posts demeaning to women. This isn't a blokes only forum.

Im convinced that he is just a troll and isn't actually young, what on earth is sharapova? google doesn't even have a meaning for it…
 
@Milky said:
@sideline eye said:
@swag tiger said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
Or we could take both. Easy, just put em on back ended contracts :laughing:
Maybe we can get Tagatese, he'd love to play for Taylor :roll

And we may have Enough money to get sharapova and use her as a hooker. :roll :laughing:

Look, Swaggy, I've defended you in the past because of your age but you should steer clear of posts demeaning to women. This isn't a blokes only forum.

Im convinced that he is just a troll and isn't actually young, what on earth is sharapova? google doesn't even have a meaning for it…

She's a tennis player.
 
Back
Top