Balmain_Bug
New member
Done deal ?????????
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@alien said:@matty119 said:@alien said:@Balmain Bug said:We will find out more on Saturday.
If I was a betting man, I would say that there will be a WT State Cup side that will take over the role that BRET plays in the WT Structure, and if money can be found somewhere, a Wests Magpies State Cup team also.
What do you think the chances are of St. George Illawarra NRL squad players playing for Wests Magpies?
It's already a done deal, unless the Dragons decide to go somewhere else
what makes u think that???
@Original Magpie said:if the magpies end up being the dragons feeder that is a bloody a disgrace and wests tigers should be ashamed
@Original Magpie said:if the magpies end up being the dragons feeder that is a bloody a disgrace and wests tigers should be ashamed
@Tigersmurf said:But Bug, based on the above you are saying that Wests have rights as they own 50%. But Balmain own 50% too. If Balmain were to fold, then shouldn't your argument be that Western Suburbs should be elevated into the NRL in place of Wests Tigers?
If we are happy to throw out the 100 years of Balmain tradition with the bathwater, then why not go the whole hog and reintroduce the maggies to first grade. Hang on, that won't work, because the Wests side of the merger cannot survive on their own.
It seems to me that there needs to be a branching away from Balmain and Western Suburbs and that the focus should be on Wests Tigers in all grades. I am not criticising you Bug, I just think we keep both or we keep none.
@Balmain Bug said:@Original Magpie said:if the magpies end up being the dragons feeder that is a bloody a disgrace and wests tigers should be ashamed
When the Fib was asked at the Wests AGM if Magpies could be the WT feeder if Balmain where to fold he stated that that could never happen because Balmain would never accept that.
Balmain do not have one cent left to run a State Cup side. So the Wests Group members who sit on the WT BOARD should push hard and insist that the Magpies are the feeder side. It is none of Balmains business. The whole issue seems to be this, because Balmain can no longer field a side, they feel that Wests Magpies should not field a side either and that it should be a Wests Tigers State Cup side !!!
It's a disgrace that the Wests Group who own 50% of the Wests Tigers won't be permitted by Balmain to be the sole State Cup team. If, and it's a big If, Wests can get funding to field a State Cup side, and they do not get players from Wests Tigers and are forced to get players from somewhere else, the Balmain members on the Wests Tigers board should hang their heads in shame.
The Fib should be sacked if this ends up being the case. The numbers will be there for the Fib to be removed from his position.
@Balmain Bug said:@Tigersmurf said:But Bug, based on the above you are saying that Wests have rights as they own 50%. But Balmain own 50% too. If Balmain were to fold, then shouldn't your argument be that Western Suburbs should be elevated into the NRL in place of Wests Tigers?
If we are happy to throw out the 100 years of Balmain tradition with the bathwater, then why not go the whole hog and reintroduce the maggies to first grade. Hang on, that won't work, because the Wests side of the merger cannot survive on their own.
It seems to me that there needs to be a branching away from Balmain and Western Suburbs and that the focus should be on Wests Tigers in all grades. I am not criticising you Bug, I just think we keep both or we keep none.
Balmain won't 'fold' as an organization. That organization will always own 50% of the Wests Tigers. Don't twist what I am saying Smurf.
I am Wests Tigers all the way. I am just saying that if Wests can afford to field a team in 2012, they should have WT players in that side, not Dragons players. It's a frigging joke.