Byron_Bay_Fan
New member
The same Sun Herald article that the Roosters are hoping to have Pearce on deck as soon as possible this season, but we're hearing the club is considering squeezing him out at its conclusion.
Big name player in trouble
- Thread starter GNR4LIFE
- Start date
happy_tiger
Well-known member
Now it turns out it will take the NRL at least 6 weeks before they meet on what to do with Pearce
Let me guess they are waiting for the storm clouds to pass …....
Let me guess they are waiting for the storm clouds to pass …....
Byron_Bay_Fan
New member
Or waiting to see if the collie is going to press charges
greatodensraven
New member
@Milky said:
Pretty disturbing track record isn't it.
supercoach
Well-known member
@happy tiger said:
This whole affair has had a bad smell to it since the day Junior-Junior was whisked out of the country even before the dog had stopped barking. It makes you think there was a grand plan and it also makes you think who was involved, Chooks??? NRL????. Anyway from the outside it certainly looks like not is all kosher
@Milky said:
Pretty ordinary right? Packer should have been deported and Lui should have been stamped never to play again. SKD hasn't been judged yet and is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
But, if they're going to punt Carney for his efforts, Pearce is no better and should suffer the same fate. Over the inconsistencies from the NRL.
Byron_Bay_Fan
New member
Big article in yesterday's Sun Herald from Pearce's mates stating he did not hurt anyone and should come back in without penalty. (if my memory correct)
Byron_Bay_Fan
New member
Latest ABC news is that the Roosters are considering suing the supplier of the video on Mitch Pearce - things are hotting up.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-26/sydney-roosters-consider-suing-supplier-of-pearce-lewd-video/7203674?section=sport
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-26/sydney-roosters-consider-suing-supplier-of-pearce-lewd-video/7203674?section=sport
Byron_Bay_Fan
New member
Mitch was stupid of course but at least when he was ordered out he did get out soon enough under his circumstances.
Tim Sheens
Well-known member
@tiger_one said:
A lot of difference between being in public place where you are open to scrutiny, and the confines of a private residence for mine. Unless someone is breaking the law, all other actions should remain private unless and/or until consent is given to sell or distribute publicly.
happy_tiger
Well-known member
Look a lot of people seem to forget you need to get someone's permission to take photos of them or their businesses etc …......
Fade_To_Black
New member
@happy tiger said:
Are you sure about that? It would take a while to ask the permission of 80 people if you took a photo of your mate enjoying a day at the footy or something with all those people in the shot behind them.
N
newtiger
Guest
My wife is a school teacher, and they have to get a signed permission from the parents just for the annual school photo.
happy_tiger
Well-known member
@Fade To Black said:
FTB try going to your kids / grandkids swimming carnival and take a photo
Or even your daughters dance studio
Fade_To_Black
New member
@happy tiger said:
Don't worry I know all about that. Tried getting the missus to film the 1st time I took my son swimming at the local pool and the pool attendant come out and told her to shut it off immediately. All due to the issue of sick pedophile scum no doubt and I can understand that.
But when it is just adults involved? How come paparazzi don't get sued by every single celebrity that they catch in disgrace? It mustn't be illegal as such I would presume.
