Brian Smith report

Smith is a highly qualified candidate to do this report having coached at numerous clubs with a unique understanding of the machinations of how a footy club works. He would know how to sort the chaff from the hay so to speak.

I just hope the report is used constructively not to push hidden agendas. This is a key test of leadership within the club. If we use the report to implement structures that will make us a long-term force it could be invaluable, if the report is used as a short-term fix we could well be forced into another period of mediocrity.

Report should have been done in around 2007-2009\. it may have identified the issues that were making us serial under-performers and in the end cost us the chance of another premiership while we had the list to do it.
 
@larrycorowa said:
Smith is a highly qualified candidate to do this report having coached at numerous clubs with a unique understanding of the machinations of how a footy club works. He would know how to sort the chaff from the hay so to speak.

I just hope the report is used constructively not to push hidden agendas. This is a key test of leadership within the club. If we use the report to implement structures that will make us a long-term force it could be invaluable, if the report is used as a short-term fix we could well be forced into another period of mediocrity.

Report should have been done in around 2007-2009\. it may have identified the issues that were making us serial under-performers and in the end cost us the chance of another premiership while we had the list to do it.

I agree that the report should have been done years ago. However, Sheens had way too much sway to allow an independent report into the club when he was coach and none of the CEOs had the balls to stand up to the guy. I'm sure Smith's report does not make pretty reading. Let's hope the club has the guts (and the funds) to implement the changes that are necessary to get this organisation on to a sustainable footing. It's not going to happen overnight, that's for sure. A new Board will be the first big step. Let's wait and see what the next 12 to 18 months bring. Should be interesting.
 
@LCA said:
@T-REXX said:
@LCA said:
@T-REXX said:
He is right though. Potter doesn't communicate well. Hasn't from day one. And it's not that it's wrong. It's that he doesn't do it the way it probably should be done. As much as people bag sheens. If a player did wrong he would explain it and discuss it. Potter doesn't. Doesn't go into depth with players and what needs to be done to improve.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

How do you know that? Why do you write that as if it's fact? And, who are you to decide if it's the way it should be done.

It's a forum. And it's an opinion and I do happen to know a tad little bit.
\
\
Don't like it, don't read it. Simple.
\
\
It's a bit like the report that Brian has released. It's fact yet people don't want to believe it.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

Man, how do I know I don't like it if I don't read it? Can you just enlighten me on that one to start with?

But, if I do read it and i think it's BS, I will comment. All you've added here is an opinion presented like it's fact and asked us to believe it because "you know a tad little bit".

I genuinely believe you "know little"….about anything. Simple as that.

I look forward to critiquing your next pearls of wisdom.

Bravo!!

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
@T-REXX said:
@LCA said:
@T-REXX said:
@LCA said:
How do you know that? Why do you write that as if it's fact? And, who are you to decide if it's the way it should be done.

It's a forum. And it's an opinion and I do happen to know a tad little bit.
\
\
Don't like it, don't read it. Simple.
\
\
It's a bit like the report that Brian has released. It's fact yet people don't want to believe it.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

Man, how do I know I don't like it if I don't read it? Can you just enlighten me on that one to start with?

But, if I do read it and i think it's BS, I will comment. All you've added here is an opinion presented like it's fact and asked us to believe it because "you know a tad little bit".

I genuinely believe you "know little"….about anything. Simple as that.

I look forward to critiquing your next pearls of wisdom.

Bravo!!

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

Look LCA nothing personal , but if Rexxy comments I will always stop and read

The man is in the know :wink:
 
I think it is important to remember that this is the same Brian Smith that would text Danny Buderus at 2am to advise him that the Knights had a gun hooker named Seu Seu breathing down his neck and he needed to stay on his game.

Who also got run out of town by no less than four clubs. Lucky for Brian no one was appointed to conduct a report on his time at each club. He was employed by clubs to shake things up and move dead wood so I don't understand why he is on a pedestal.

Why is it assumed that the content of his report is accurate? It is merely his opinion and may have some valid points but I would be concerned as to whether it is a report or a resume.
 
Smith was a coach, now well known for his ability to re-structure a club, yet not being able to convert the resulting changes himself. He is a solid candidate for the audit he was asked to undertake, after many years it actually seems his forte after all…

People are popping off as if he under-wrote Potter, who really knows... though the one thing most in the football world wouldnt listen to is his evaluation of a coach. It seems long ago Brian lost touch with player relations himself and instead embedded himself in the finer details of club structure and such. The man is obviously an asset in a specific field of football operations, and was employed by us in that very role.

People are always looking for a conspiracy theory...
 
First point of his report before he even gets to the coaching staff should be "the facilities are unfit for a park football side let alone a professional rugby league team."
Concord needs to be addressed well before Potter.
A good tradesman never blames his tools, but Potter has a mechano set and Bellamy is decked out with Makita gear.
 
@Fraze23 said:
First point of his report before he even gets to the coaching staff should be "the facilities are unfit for a park football side let alone a professional rugby league team."
Concord needs to be addressed well before Potter.
A good tradesman never blames his tools, but Potter has a mechano set and Bellamy is decked out with Makita gear.

I don't believe this comment at all. Do they have footballs and a park to train at ? Do they have some weights ?

To me that is more than enough.

If we have the right players and a fair run with injuries and we execute to a good game plan and we train hard and are committed we should do really well. I would be looking at all of these factors rather than blaming not having the latest rowing machine or stationary bicycle.
 
@stevetiger said:
@Fraze23 said:
First point of his report before he even gets to the coaching staff should be "the facilities are unfit for a park football side let alone a professional rugby league team."
Concord needs to be addressed well before Potter.
A good tradesman never blames his tools, but Potter has a mechano set and Bellamy is decked out with Makita gear.

I don't believe this comment at all. Do they have footballs and a park to train at ? Do they have some weights ?

To me that is more than enough.

If we have the right players and a fair run with injuries and we execute to a good game plan and we train hard and are committed we should do really well. I would be looking at all of these factors rather than blaming not having the latest rowing machine or stationary bicycle.

It's not so much about gym equipment and footballs as it is about sports science, rehab and recovery. Look at our amount of injuries and their recovery time compared to other clubs. Concord isn't fit for a professional sports team.
 
Our facilities are very ancient. It's great to have conducted the report but let's see what actions are taken as a consequence. Waste of time if changes are not made accordingly.
 
@Fraze23 said:
It's not so much about gym equipment and footballs as it is about sports science, rehab and recovery. Look at our amount of injuries and their recovery time compared to other clubs. Concord isn't fit for a professional sports team.

All teams get injuries. There is no magic wand that can stop it or get players back quicker.

I don't think that there is any truth in these comments at all.
 
Rich clubs like Storm, Broncos, South Sydney etc. can afford to have the best training facilities. Those clubs also have highly regarded medical stuff on their pay roll, with all the modern scientific sports science equipment and knowledge at hand for their players. The difference between them and poorer clubs like us is they hire people that have excelled in their chosen professions not just scraped through. You get what you pay for and our club can not compete with them at this stage. But we are still doing better than some others.
 
@Tigermama said:
Rich clubs like Storm, Broncos, South Sydney etc. can afford to have the best training facilities. Those clubs also have highly regarded medical stuff on their pay roll, with all the modern scientific sports science equipment and knowledge at hand for their players. The difference between them and poorer clubs like us is they hire people that have excelled in their chosen professions not just scraped through. You get what you pay for and our club can not compete with them at this stage. But we are still doing better than some others.

Yep look who Farah gave credit to with his recovery to his dislocated elbow ,his brother the Souths Physio.
 
Did we really need someone to tell us that our club needs better training facilities, gym, better injury management staff, as our players are always injured and take to long to come back and that we need a head of football. I don't think so.

Did we need someone from outside the club to point the finger at Potter so no one in the club can be blamed for the dirty work. Now we're getting warmer.

Mayer as boss you should hang your head in shame, what we needed to hear was we need a change of CEO. In reality good CEOs are unearthed, not recycled from two or three previous clubs.

Which brings me to a old favorite GW Bush saying, "you can fool some of the people, some of the time, but, you can't fool all the people all the time".
Times up GM, move on.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
@tigermaniac said:
Did we really need someone to tell us that our club needs better training facilities, gym, better injury management staff, as our players are always injured and take to long to come back and that we need a head of football. I don't think so.

Did we need someone from outside the club to point the finger at Potter so no one in the club can be blamed for the dirty work. Now we're getting warmer.

Mayer as boss you should hang your head in shame, what we needed to hear was we need a change of CEO. In reality good CEOs are unearthed, not recycled from two or three previous clubs.

Which brings me to a old favorite GW Bush saying, "you can fool some of the people, some of the time, but, you can't fool all the people all the time".
Times up GM, move on.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

What about ''Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me, you can't get fooled again''
 
I think we are heading in the right direction. Give it a week or two and the WT will get their man. Ricky Stuart come on down.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
@tigermaniac said:
Did we really need someone to tell us that our club needs better training facilities, gym, better injury management staff, as our players are always injured and take to long to come back and that we need a head of football. I don't think so.

Did we need someone from outside the club to point the finger at Potter so no one in the club can be blamed for the dirty work. Now we're getting warmer.

Mayer as boss you should hang your head in shame, what we needed to hear was we need a change of CEO. In reality good CEOs are unearthed, not recycled from two or three previous clubs.

**Which brings me to a old favorite GW Bush saying, "you can fool some of the people, some of the time, but, you can't fool all the people all the time".**
Times up GM, move on.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

"Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."
-George W Bush

You know what, we don't need someone to tell us our facilities are poor. But its a large leap to say we don't need someone to examine and review our club in order to maximise (at least in the short term) the facilities we have, to tell us which parts of our limited football budget are delivering and which parts are underperforming.

If people don't think sporting clubs, in particular our club, need some sort of external review to assess where we were and how to improve….they are kidding themselves.
 
@LaT said:
@tigermaniac said:
Did we really need someone to tell us that our club needs better training facilities, gym, better injury management staff, as our players are always injured and take to long to come back and that we need a head of football. I don't think so.

Did we need someone from outside the club to point the finger at Potter so no one in the club can be blamed for the dirty work. Now we're getting warmer.

Mayer as boss you should hang your head in shame, what we needed to hear was we need a change of CEO. In reality good CEOs are unearthed, not recycled from two or three previous clubs.

**Which brings me to a old favorite GW Bush saying, "you can fool some of the people, some of the time, but, you can't fool all the people all the time".**
Times up GM, move on.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_

"Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again."
-George W Bush

You know what, we don't need someone to tell us our facilities are poor. But its a large leap to say we don't need someone to examine and review our club in order to maximise (at least in the short term) the facilities we have, to tell us which parts of our limited football budget are delivering and which parts are underperforming.

If people don't think sporting clubs, in particular our club, need some sort of external review to assess where we were and how to improve….they are kidding themselves.

Geez your on the mark. A review is needed every year, and I might just add so you don't correct me again, a review is also needed when things are going good. Thanks for pointing out the obvious.

This is not a review. Stop kidding yourself.

A review should have been done last year.

Did you hear of a review or any of its recommendations from last year.

Was there a last one.

It just goes to show how much the club knows, you know and I know.

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 
Its not a review….we need a review....we just shouldn't get a review that **"tells us that our club needs better training facilities, gym, better injury management staff, as our players are always injured and take to long to come back and that we need a head of football"**....

Clear as mud. Just to be straight, are you upset at Smith conducting the review?
 
@LaT said:
Its not a review….we need a review....we just shouldn't get a review that **"tells us that our club needs better training facilities, gym, better injury management staff, as our players are always injured and take to long to come back and that we need a head of football"**....

Clear as mud. Just to be straight, are you upset at Smith conducting the review?

It's people like you that support backstabbing practices and don't even know it. Why are you trying to correct me.

You nailed it, the whole process is clear as mud.

I'm not upset at a review but the timing of it.

Can you tell me, do you support Potter? And do you agree that this is how a club should be run?

_Posted using RoarFEED V.4_
 

Latest posts

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top