GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
They'll win it next yr. already have put money on them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@jirskyr said:I don't think Broncs lost it with their gameplan, they had relied on their flexible defence all year.
I think they got too tired, the Cowboys surged the last 20 and Broncos didn't have anything left when they had the ball. St George defended their way to the premiership in 2010: they beat us by kicking to the corners and defending the sets.
I also think that when it came down to trying to get the ball near the opposition's line at the end, Cowboys still had Scott, Tamou and Taumalolo going forward, particularly the later who had some massive carries. Broncos forwards struggled to work out of trouble, particularly with Blair and Thaiday as the match-ending props.
Sometimes footy plays out like tennis, you just need to hold your serve and hope your opponent gives you an opportunity on his. Cowboys held their serves in the last 20 mins, Broncos only dropped their last two serves, but it cost them.
Reed and Milford slid on Morgan for 79:50 of the game, no idea why Oates decided to come in hard on that last play and leave his winger, no way was Morgan going to beat both Milf and Reed to the line.
I was of the feeling that if extra time went 20 mins like in 1989, Cowboys would have finished all over the top of Broncos.
@Tigerspirit said:@innsaneink said:They had it… They lost it
They could've really put it out of reach.... They were well on top
They stopped playing footy = suicide
Agree but I am glad Attacking football won again, NRL is such a sweet game when there is an attacking style not this boring defence style trend which is killing the game
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
@GNR4LIFE said:They'll win it next yr. already have put money on them.
@cqtiger said:Poor ol' Hunt couldn't find a hole to hide in.
Anyway the NRL got their second dream result. Who next year?
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
@Cultured Bogan said:@Tigerspirit said:@innsaneink said:They had it… They lost it
They could've really put it out of reach.... They were well on top
They stopped playing footy = suicide
Agree but I am glad Attacking football won again, NRL is such a sweet game when there is an attacking style not this boring defence style trend which is killing the game
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
I don't mind watching a quality defence hold out well orchestrated attacking gameplans.
There's room for both in the modern game.
@Abraham said:Mods can we please close this thread.
And all others in the future that contain "Balmain" and "1989" in the same sentence.
Thanks in advance.
@Golden_Boots said:If you don't talk about it you will never be desensitised to it. As therapy for watching Mick Neil head hit the line you watch JT trip over in the 05 GF after kicking downfield and leaving a gap for Benji. Have never seen it happen to him since.
@Abraham said:Mods can we please close this thread.
And all others in the future that contain "Balmain" and "1989" in the same sentence.
Thanks in advance.
@happy tiger said:@Abraham said:Mods can we please close this thread.
And all others in the future that contain "Balmain" and "1989" in the same sentence.
Thanks in advance.
Ok can we talk about the Canberra Raiders in 1989
Some of us hoped that Canberra would win that day, nothing personal
@happy tiger said:@Abraham said:Mods can we please close this thread.
And all others in the future that contain "Balmain" and "1989" in the same sentence.
Thanks in advance.
Ok can we talk about the Canberra Raiders in 1989
Some of us hoped that Canberra would win that day, nothing personal
@Abraham said:@Golden_Boots said:If you don't talk about it you will never be desensitised to it. As therapy for watching Mick Neil head hit the line you watch JT trip over in the 05 GF after kicking downfield and leaving a gap for Benji. Have never seen it happen to him since.
Pretty sure you have to watch something in order to become desensitised to it.
That will never happen. Ever.
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
@Fade To Black said:@happy tiger said:@Abraham said:Mods can we please close this thread.
And all others in the future that contain "Balmain" and "1989" in the same sentence.
Thanks in advance.
Ok can we talk about the Canberra Raiders in 1989
Some of us hoped that Canberra would win that day, nothing personal
Bill Harrigan hoped Canberra won that day. Cheating dog.
@happy tiger said:@Abraham said:Mods can we please close this thread.
And all others in the future that contain "Balmain" and "1989" in the same sentence.
Thanks in advance.
Ok can we talk about the Canberra Raiders in 1989
Some of us hoped that Canberra would win that day, nothing personal
@ghost said:@happy tiger said:@Abraham said:Mods can we please close this thread.
And all others in the future that contain "Balmain" and "1989" in the same sentence.
Thanks in advance.
Ok can we talk about the Canberra Raiders in 1989
Some of us hoped that Canberra would win that day, nothing personal
I gladly cheered Darcy Lawler and that mighty Saints team in 63…..nothing personal of course.
@innsaneink said:@Abraham said:@Golden_Boots said:If you don't talk about it you will never be desensitised to it. As therapy for watching Mick Neil head hit the line you watch JT trip over in the 05 GF after kicking downfield and leaving a gap for Benji. Have never seen it happen to him since.
Pretty sure you have to watch something in order to become desensitised to it.
That will never happen. Ever.
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
The way youre carrying on Id have thought youd have at least seen the game
I watch every Grand Final