There's worry for the pressures and challenges they'll undergo as WT players and I just don't want this experience to drive them away. I'd also like to be a club that is competent in optimally developing all our players tbh.
Lauren, you always speak sense, even though I don't always agree with you.
You see Brooks as a scapegoat, but don't you think it is more detrimental to the club and our development to keep a halfback who has failed to deliver for nearly a decade?
And don't you think we have invested quite enough into his development? It's not like we haven't tried.
I'm not saying we have had countless halves breaking our doors down over the last decade, but isn't there also the argument that management's unwavering faith in him has potentially cost us the chance to develop anyone else over this woeful period? The argument definitely goes both ways.
To your other point, I'm not saying he is solely responsible for our failures, but you cannot say that an underperforming halfback (no matter the excuse) is not a big part of the problem.
Players want to be part of success. My fear is, that players recognise our managerial lack of fortitude and don't want to be part of a club where losing is rewarded.
@GNR4LIFE and @Kazoo-Kid may be right, we might be stuck with him for better or for worse.
It's just not for better. It isn't. We have had more than enough evidence to know.
Us as fans desperately crave some measure of success, some measure of improvement. As such, we should be demand more decisive action from our club's management. Even if you see him as a scapegoat.