Bye Farah

[The_Patriot]

I don't like to say it, but that was a 'very' strange decision from an experienced coach when Farah should never have been included in the team list in the first place.
The only reason I can come up with is Madge showed 'favouritism' in Farah playing... Why?...maybe so Farah could be shown in a very favourable way as having taken one for the team/"did what the team asked of him".
Something stinks!!! as it just doesn't add up.
I sincerely hope this is not the 1st step in Farah becoming an Ambassador for our club now his playing days are over.

Farah has played his last ever game. I would suggest you embrace that and stop looking for the next lot of drama

 

[The_Patriot]

Funny thing is ... we played better when he came on.

That doesn't support the narrative.
Wouldn't matter what Farah did minds have been made up about him long ago.



All I can go on is the people that actually know him i.e. the players that have played against and beside him, have openly and outwardly supported him consistently, and by there actions on Sunday showed again nothing less.

Whether we played better or not, is a matter of opinion. You might scof and say it’s only his detractors who will say we didn’t, and his detractors will say only his fanboys will say we did. I’m looking at what Robbie said after the game. It’s obvious by those comments he had no business out there. Him on the bench royally screwed our rotation. 2 hookers ?

The best thing is, we won’t have these debates anymore.



Do you really think this is why we lost that game. Or is this just politics?

Didn’t help. We had a 3 man bench for 3 quarters of the game. Sorry, 2 hookers on the bench was a terrible decision.


Wait, so, you’ve gone back to the dribble you were spouting the other night about bringing either McQueen or Talau into the side. I understand that you’re not asking: what does it change?

Rather how could he have been allowed to play and why is he now saying he probably shouldn’t have... well that is football, bit of dramatisation by Farah and the realisation that of his last potential game time in the business he needed to come on and at least give the home crowd, *his* home crowd something to cheer about.

Rugby League to a tee, he was the best candidate and passed the minimum physical fitness requirements to be selected. Was good to have Josh ending the year playing consistent footy and even seemed as if we did play better without Farah... have you noticed I’ve never disagreed on that? It is due to his character and smarts - that have seen him go so far on the field and for a majority of that time with us - I believe as to why Madge was forced (literally forced) to call upon the teacher and not the student.

Did you also notice that he didn’t get on the pitch for about 60 minutes on Sunday?

Can’t have your cake and eat it?...

Simply looking for a sly parting shot isn’t gonna cut it. That’s not a comment worthy of the player... regardless of his character. His actions on Sunday prove his leadership and potentially some of the more negative characteristics you’ve harped on yet he didn’t play a single part in us bowing out for the year

its quite pathetic.

Good on you for calling it out.

 

[Tigerboy]

Funny thing is ... we played better when he came on.

That doesn't support the narrative.
Wouldn't matter what Farah did minds have been made up about him long ago.



All I can go on is the people that actually know him i.e. the players that have played against and beside him, have openly and outwardly supported him consistently, and by there actions on Sunday showed again nothing less.

Whether we played better or not, is a matter of opinion. You might scof and say it’s only his detractors who will say we didn’t, and his detractors will say only his fanboys will say we did. I’m looking at what Robbie said after the game. It’s obvious by those comments he had no business out there. Him on the bench royally screwed our rotation. 2 hookers ?

The best thing is, we won’t have these debates anymore.



Do you really think this is why we lost that game. Or is this just politics?

Didn’t help. We had a 3 man bench for 3 quarters of the game. Sorry, 2 hookers on the bench was a terrible decision.


Wait, so, you’ve gone back to the dribble you were spouting the other night about bringing either McQueen or Talau into the side. I understand that you’re not asking: what does it change?

Rather how could he have been allowed to play and why is he now saying he probably shouldn’t have... well that is football, bit of dramatisation by Farah and the realisation that of his last potential game time in the business he needed to come on and at least give the home crowd, *his* home crowd something to cheer about.

Rugby League to a tee, he was the best candidate and passed the minimum physical fitness requirements to be selected. Was good to have Josh ending the year playing consistent footy and even seemed as if we did play better without Farah... have you noticed I’ve never disagreed on that? It is his character and smarts that have seen him go so for on the field and for a major percentage of that time with us, that I believe Madge was forced - literally forced (no argument there) to call upon.

Did you also notice that he didn’t get on the pitch for about 60 minutes on Sunday?

Can’t have your cake and eat it?...

Simply looking for a sly parting shot isn’t gonna cut it. That’s not a comment worthy of the player... regardless of his character. His actions on Sunday prove his leadership and potentially some of the more negative characteristics you’ve harped on yet he didn’t play a single part in us bowing out for the year

Yes, I did notice he didn’t come one till the 60th minute, which is consistent with one of the points I have been making. We were hamstrung for 60 minutes with a 3 man bench.

Given robbie’s Endurance and bull-like stamina... given McQueen won a premiership at Souths under Maguire, and one of his most talented youths that only he could know full well what they’re capable of producing were among the remaining reserves listed.

Who exactly are you suggesting comes in to not only help fill a massive void at fullback; also to unknot and unwind our obviously already tight bench that became completely ‘hamstrung’ as soon as Cheeks had to fill in for Momirovski.

However, off the bench Chee-Kam would’ve had no impact on our rotation and DEFINITELY wouldn’t have improved it, and perhaps at the expense of Chris Lawrence much earlier in the game.

We just didn’t have the cattle going in. ET was quiet & just as swiftly as you’d defend him so would I... feel that with Eiso, Clark, ET and Lawrence all playing big minutes we needed the punch that Farah at his best could undeniably offer.

Whether he was at one hundred percent is another discussion entirely, but the only blokes who would’ve had a say on that outcome were the physicians and ultimately Robbie himself (I know I’ve worked for a club). We badly missed Josh Aloiai and that is the crux of it - nobody like him amongst the deeper playing roster... let alone to bring in 45 minutes prior to start

 

[GNR4LIFE]

What are you going on about McQueen for? He wasn’t even in the squad at that point. I’ve said what I would have done. Would it have changed the result? We’ll never know. This whole debate is pointless. They’ll be less frequent from now on though which is good.

 

[Tigerboy]

What are you going on about McQueen for? He wasn’t even in the squad at that point. I’ve said what I would have done. Would it have changed the result? We’ll never know. This whole debate is pointless. They’ll be less frequent from now on though which is good.

Oh my goodness, you’ve totally avoided the question again. I think you’ve missed the point in about 3/4 of my posts, lol I don’t care to debate with you on your opinions of Robbie Farah!

 

[Tim Sheens]

There was no premeditation in regard to his inclusion.

He should not have been in the original 21 named and definitely not left in the last 19 at the expense of a forward. That falls squarely on Maguire, unless there was undue influence from Pascoe, and if so, well, he should resign for interfering.

 

[Tigerboy]

There was no premeditation in regard to his inclusion.

He should not have been in the original 21 named and definitely not left in the last 19 at the expense of a forward. That falls squarely on Maguire, unless there was undue influence from Pascoe, and if so, well, he should resign for interfering.

The blokes who should resign are the ones who were thanking Gallen!

Which other forward could’ve come in, the cupboard only has so much stock in it? We’ll never know if it would’ve changed the result though, so put it on Madge not R.F if you’re looking to find fault in a single person, let alone somebody who doesn’t even play!

 

[Madge]

When Thompson was ruled out, no matter who came in, we still would of lost. It’s that simple. We had no back up fullback and we already didn’t have a sufficient amount of props going into that game through injury.

 

[Tim Sheens]

There was no premeditation in regard to his inclusion.

He should not have been in the original 21 named and definitely not left in the last 19 at the expense of a forward. That falls squarely on Maguire, unless there was undue influence from Pascoe, and if so, well, he should resign for interfering.

The blokes who should resign are the ones who were thanking Gallen!

Which other forward could’ve come in, the cupboard only has so much stock in it? We’ll never know if it would’ve changed the result though, so put it on Madge not R.F if you’re looking to find fault in a single person, let alone somebody who doesn’t even play!

Did you actually read my post, as your response says otherwise?

 

[Tigerboy]

There was no premeditation in regard to his inclusion.

He should not have been in the original 21 named and definitely not left in the last 19 at the expense of a forward. That falls squarely on Maguire, unless there was undue influence from Pascoe, and if so, well, he should resign for interfering.

The blokes who should resign are the ones who were thanking Gallen!

Which other forward could’ve come in, the cupboard only has so much stock in it? We’ll never know if it would’ve changed the result though, so put it on Madge not R.F if you’re looking to find fault in a single person, let alone somebody who doesn’t even play!

Did you actually read my post, as your response says otherwise?

Seriously, with that tone of voice? Yes, I did, and subsequently asked you to name me at least two forwards in our squad willing and able to come in and join the squad in #20 or #21?

 

[Tigerboy]

When Thompson was ruled out, no matter who came in, we still would of lost. It’s that simple. We had no back up fullback and we already didn’t have a sufficient amount of props going into that game through injury.

Mbye OUT Liddle OUT Matulino OUT Packer OUT , just to name a few

 

[Tim Sheens]

When Thompson was ruled out, no matter who came in, we still would of lost. It’s that simple. We had no back up fullback and we already didn’t have a sufficient amount of props going into that game through injury.

WT lost that game in a short period and on the back of some poor calls, especially when Nofo was penalised and then denied a try with a lot less interference than when Brooks was blocked with in their try.

We had clearly gotten on top in the period prior to halftime and up to our necks in the game, then only had about 10-15% possession to begin the second half.

 

[Tigerboy]

When Thompson was ruled out, no matter who came in, we still would of lost. It’s that simple. We had no back up fullback and we already didn’t have a sufficient amount of props going into that game through injury.

WT lost that game in a short period and on the back of some poor calls, especially when Nofo was penalised and then denied a try with a lot less interference than when Brooks was blocked with in their try.

We had clearly gotten on top in the period prior to halftime and up to our necks in the game, then only had about 10-15% possession to begin the second half.

It was actually a much, much sadder and bitter loss than I think people realise at the moment. I for one won’t forget for a long time, however I will forgive. Madgewards and upwards!

 

[Tim Sheens]

There was no premeditation in regard to his inclusion.

He should not have been in the original 21 named and definitely not left in the last 19 at the expense of a forward. That falls squarely on Maguire, unless there was undue influence from Pascoe, and if so, well, he should resign for interfering.

The blokes who should resign are the ones who were thanking Gallen!

Which other forward could’ve come in, the cupboard only has so much stock in it? We’ll never know if it would’ve changed the result though, so put it on Madge not R.F if you’re looking to find fault in a single person, let alone somebody who doesn’t even play!

Did you actually read my post, as your response says otherwise?


Seriously, with that tone of voice? Yes, I did, and subsequently asked you to name me at least two forwards in our squad willing and able to come in and join the squad in #20 or #21?

Sorry, wasn't meant to be aggressive, but I did blame the coach (and/or Pascoe), not the player, in my original post. McQueen was fit and in the 21 until Saturday arvo.

I don't like Farah and haven't since he went behind management with his Grange gifting scum director mate, but it does not stop me from acknowledging his other efforts, including working around the clock recently, even though I have since way back then refrained from cheering him as an individual.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

What are you going on about McQueen for? He wasn’t even in the squad at that point. I’ve said what I would have done. Would it have changed the result? We’ll never know. This whole debate is pointless. They’ll be less frequent from now on though which is good.


Oh my goodness, you’ve totally avoided the question again. I think you’ve missed the point in about 3/4 of my posts, lol I don’t care to debate with you on your opinions of Robbie Farah!

That’s because in half your posts you make no sense. You just ramble. You bring up stuff that isn’t even on topic. One minute you’re going off the deep end, the next you’re liking my posts. It’s why I don’t bother with you most of the time.

 

[Telltails]

There was no premeditation in regard to his inclusion.

He should not have been in the original 21 named and definitely not left in the last 19 at the expense of a forward. That falls squarely on Maguire, unless there was undue influence from Pascoe, and if so, well, he should resign for interfering.

Cooper Cronk should never should been named to play in last year's grand final either but he was, and he played and his team carried him in the most important game of the season knowing full well the extent of his injury. They won - so he was a hero. Had they lost things may be viewed differently.
Don't think Pascoe would have had anything to do with it. Coaches build relationships with players - no ordinary player in his last game ever, he deserved to be named in the squad he earned that right and have no doubt the players and club will have all backed that. Would never have played if Thompson hadnt got injured prior to kick off.
The coach made a decision - his options werent great. I respect his decision and support it because he backed a player that he knew would give his all and had done so for his entire career. That's the sort of coach I want at the club.
Just see it as another opportunity for those who have preconceived ideas about Farah to have their final parting shot. No surprises really.

 

[Tigerboy]

@GNR4LIFE don’t think I’ve been liking too many of your posts - seeing as they are totally opinionated and lacking any concrete hard evidence. Too late now to pretend you haven’t understood the question, GNR, but I find it hilarious you felt it prudent to tag me!! You couldn’t find the punchline in a comedy store

 

[Tigerboy]

There was no premeditation in regard to his inclusion.

He should not have been in the original 21 named and definitely not left in the last 19 at the expense of a forward. That falls squarely on Maguire, unless there was undue influence from Pascoe, and if so, well, he should resign for interfering.

Cooper Cronk should never should been named to play in last year's grand final either but he was, and he played and his team carried him in the most important game of the season knowing full well the extent of his injury. They won - so he was a hero. Had they lost things may be viewed differently.
Don't think Pascoe would have had anything to do with it. Coaches build relationships with players - no ordinary player in his last game ever, he deserved to be named in the squad he earned that right and have no doubt the players and club will have all backed that. Would never have played if Thompson hadnt got injured prior to kick off.
The coach made a decision - his options werent great. I respect his decision and support it because he backed a player that he knew would give his all and had done so for his entire career. That's the sort of coach I want at the club.
Just see it as another opportunity for those who have preconceived ideas about Farah to have their final parting shot. No surprises really.

Only one person fits this category and I think we are all in agreement on who ? really sad thing to me is that he must have the worst off-season imaginable coming up! No Farah to complain about and say that “he would’ve played somebody else”, then when asked directly what his approach would’ve been was lost for words... I’m really so grateful that GNR4LIFE is NOT our coach and hasn’t ever met the players. That much is obvious or his distain for one of our greatest ever players would’ve been exorcised much, much earlier. You say I ramble? You failed to answer the question on 3 continuous posts and only made reference to the character of the player and that the coach made a “bad” decision.

You’ve also stated that it wouldn’t have affected the outcome, your whole standpoint is nonsense lmfao.

Good day and don’t tag me again unless you’ve cut the 99% crap in your responses!

 

[Tigerboy]

What are you going on about McQueen for? He wasn’t even in the squad at that point. I’ve said what I would have done. Would it have changed the result? We’ll never know. This whole debate is pointless. They’ll be less frequent from now on though which is good.


Oh my goodness, you’ve totally avoided the question again. I think you’ve missed the point in about 3/4 of my posts, lol I don’t care to debate with you on your opinions of Robbie Farah!

That’s because in half your posts you make no sense. You just ramble. You bring up stuff that isn’t even on topic. One minute you’re going off the deep end, the next you’re liking my posts. It’s why I don’t bother with you most of the time.

Apparently I’m off the deep-end, scary stuff @jirskyr ?? he reckons he hasn’t understood 3/4 of my posts which is exactly why I already posted that they flew over his head... and that he shouldn’t worry about things that only concern adults or people involved with the club - as much as he may want to be one of those.

 

[BZN]

I couldn't agree more @formerguest: I replied in another thread to @Geo that I had doubts about Madges under pressure decision making after the monumentally idiotic decision to play Farah, particularly after he had said Farah wasn't fit to play.
Now you have raised an even more serious question re Pascoe, and I feel you may well be correct, as Pascoe was involved in the ongoing Farah For Ambassador fiasco.
I have been very pro-Pascoe [I sent a letter of support to the N.R.L. re Pascoe] and Madge up till now, but I now have serious concerns about both.
Something seems crook in Talarook, or in this particular case Leichhardt last Sunday.