@Tiger5150 said in [Ch 9 hammers NRL](/post/1142056) said:@crazycat said in [Ch 9 hammers NRL](/post/1141723) said:Maybe this is all a good thing.
Channel 9 is playing hardball. If this was the 80's or 90's I would be scared.
Now, well people will buy Kayo or whatever and just watch it. While Rugby League's heart is going to be in the suburbs and those TV sets are going to tune in. Kids can subscribe and will be watching on devices.
The sad bit will be the nursing homes that still push footy hard. They won't modernize and their residences won't be able to tune in.
Otherwise happy for our NRL mismanaged dinosaur to say goodbye to another mismanaged dinosaur. If that means the RTS and Val Holmes leave the game, Great.
I know you are not but there is nothing to be scared of. The game will survive. If Nine go, there will be someone else to take up the coverage. It might be for less money but you know what? That is what it will be worth. Too much rubbish over the years about the "value of the product", players should be getting more based on international standards etc etc etc. Its all BS and the players will get paid what is left based on the market.
Rugby League for way too many years has had an overinflated opinion of its own importance and this correction hopefully places some reality in the organisation.
Oh and hopefully gets rid of Greenberg.
In an ideal sporting world both ch 9 and Greenberg have nothing to do wirh rugby league in the future.Both have agendas which are bad for the game