Chee Kam re-signs till 2021

@supercoach said in [Chee Kam re\-signs till 2021](/post/1016381) said:
@Snake
Every club has a few MCK type signings. Impossible even for the Chooks to assemble a roster without a MCK type signing.

Sorry to disagree Snake, but you can’t win a comp without a handful of MCk’S on your book because these signings allow you to spend the big dollars on the elite player.

Also the plodder has already won us one game this year

Gotta agree SC as long as he is a lower end signing we can live with it
 
@Geo said in [Chee Kam re\-signs till 2021](/post/1016384) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Chee Kam re\-signs till 2021](/post/1016362) said:
#gamebreaker

**Yep for us and/or the opposition.**.

Welcome aboard Magic Mike..

???
 
He’s a beast with a step and weave . I once saw him step all 13 opposition players ( and a couple of ours ) to score a match winning try.
 
@Harvey said in [Chee Kam re\-signs till 2021](/post/1016385) said:
I have no issue if he has been signed as a utility depth player on a minimum contract. If that is the case a 2 year extension seems a bit unusual.

If he is seen as a top grade regular, we are in all sorts of trouble


Spot on
 
@Fitzy05 said in [Chee Kam re\-signs till 2021](/post/1016393) said:
He’s a beast with a step and weave . I once saw him step all 13 opposition players ( and a couple of ours ) to score a match winning try.

Use to live in a shoe box before moving to a hole in the road

Eats broken glass , 8 foot tall , runs the 100 faster than Usain Bolt , and broke the NRL record making a 155 tackles in one half of footy after getting a HIA assessment when his head made contact with the Keith Barnes stand (which was destroyed )
 
@Demps said in [Chee Kam re\-signs till 2021](/post/1016372) said:
MCK loves it here and has really had a go this year.
Happy with this signing tbh.

Yeah I don't see a problem with this, he didn't cost the Earth and has shown steady improvement since coming here. Offers versatility off the bench which you need and is a good Clubman.
 
MCK is arguably playing as well for Tigers as he ever has, so you can't knock a bloke who gets better over time, even if it was slow going early in his first contract. Signed now by 3 coaches (2 re-signed), correct?
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top