Coach can't train intelligence.

@tigger19 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431392) said:
Agreed, dumbest team in the comp, even after they bombed the short drop out that led to the Aiken try they still went for the short drop out again???

I don't get your point?
If you fail at something once.... Never try it again?
Really limits your options especially when we fail at most aspects
 
@innsaneink said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432472) said:
@tigger19 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431392) said:
Agreed, dumbest team in the comp, even after they bombed the short drop out that led to the Aiken try they still went for the short drop out again???

I don't get your point?
If you fail at something once.... Never try it again?
Really limits your options especially when we fail at most aspects

The old age adage INK....'' IF YOU DONT SUCEEDTRY,TRY, AGAIN...""
 
@tiger_heart said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431416) said:
If this was a corporation, the entire board, and CEO would have been replaced in 2006...alas, we are stuck with job for the boys..

If this was a privately owned company, Madge would have driven the share price down so low it would be delisted
 
@tigerwest said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432165) said:
@jc99 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432150) said:
@fish88 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432148) said:
Summed up perfectly by no one at dummy half. That play Joffa dented the line got a quick okay the ball, one metre out with he game on the line, and Boone at dummy half. Sums up this team perfectly. No ability do the 1%ers, and no winners in the side that will lift when needed.

That's on Madge for picking Liddle to play 80 minutes when he clearly can't do it effectively.

Do we know why he wasn't there though? Why didn't Joffa have a look before playing the ball?

But the fact he wasn't there should have been covered by someone, it's one of the most basic football requirements that these blokes would have been doing this all there footy lives?

But some believe that's on the coach who should cover that particular play aspect before every game - sure!!!!!!
 
@mikey said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432517) said:
@tigerwest said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432165) said:
@jc99 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432150) said:
@fish88 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432148) said:
Summed up perfectly by no one at dummy half. That play Joffa dented the line got a quick okay the ball, one metre out with he game on the line, and Boone at dummy half. Sums up this team perfectly. No ability do the 1%ers, and no winners in the side that will lift when needed.

That's on Madge for picking Liddle to play 80 minutes when he clearly can't do it effectively.

Do we know why he wasn't there though? Why didn't Joffa have a look before playing the ball?

But the fact he wasn't there should have been covered by someone, it's one of the most basic football requirements that these blokes would have been doing this all there footy lives?

But some believe that's on the coach who should cover that particular play aspect before every game - sure!!!!!!

Should’ve been who ever was closest to Joffa, it’s so basic I wouldn’t have thought it needed special mention, these blokes are supposed to be first graders.
 
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432294) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432163) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432075) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432052) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431890) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431801) said:
They are first grade players for godsake. They had every opportunity to win that game just by playing smart footy. That was not a coaching issue tonight that was a team of rudderless dumb arses. Maguire may pay the penalty for that performance, but they were not outcoached or out played by the opposition they beat themselves through stupidity.

Only good preparation can increase the mental toughness and resilience that a few of you are criticising the players for having an absence of. This comes from coaching.
The reinforcements of standards and attitude also stems from coaching, as does encouragement and inspiration.
So stop allotting all blame to the players when tactical and mental preparation derives from the coaching staff's ability to utilise correct tactical and mental preparation methods suited to the team - based on their capability.
Their game plans, strategies (including risk management) and goals are also set under the directive of the him too. So rather than deflect how poor we are due to Madge's systems, at least recognise that he too is responsible for promoting team trust and interaction/cooperation, which we seldom see in a positive light. Then maybe you'd realise that the simple duty of not refining and modifying most of these aspects is the crux of our problems.

We aren't in a position to change all our playing group but we also aren't exactly powerless to change these problems either. Only the coach and his staff can control this. So c'mon what's everyone doing as it's clear the man needs a helping hand with everything.
It's only further humiliating the team (and fans) to continue to persist with it.

Edit : I do think the senior players deserve harsh criticism for poor leadership however, as they not only help reinforce Madge's standards etc they are also responsible for bringing the group together and helping with team cohesion.

Too analytical Lauren. I have never heard a quality player from any team not own a poor performance. That is the only mentality that will change our path and until we develop.a squad of players who own their performances and mean it - more of the same.

A quality player from a quality team is surrounded by and rewarded by excellence.
We look so clueless and uninspired from continuing to select struggling players and not changing tactics. It makes us look like the main attraction in this year's bloody circus.

I get what you're saying, but when the person responsible for managing the team's collective efficacy, group accountability and ability to reset focus is unable to get the team all on the same page it's still his fault regardless how you see it.

I don't think it's just Madge though and feel there's leadership problems from the top - that there's a few who've dropped the ball and are not fulfilling their roles/duties.

Having no dummy half when you are attacking the opposition line with game on the line - sums up this squad. That is not a coaching issue - at FG level that was unacceptable. FG players have to be able to think for themselves during a game a coach can't be responsible for that. They get paid well to represent the club that comes with some ownership of their individual performance.
Maguire may have failed at assembling a squad good enough to compete in the competition and that may cost him the job, but the players last night had every opportunity to win and they didn't get it done.

No offence but I think people within the club are also hindering his capacity to attract certain players. Thought his personal targets of Lomax or Brimson were great prospects.

However he keeps picking Liddle and Mbye for that role and I think most of us have realised how unproductive that's been for the team.
Yeah I agree from our key players (in our spine) there's a lack of control and a commanding presence required to direct the team out of trouble. But they also aren't surrounded by the best support players in the forwards or our backs and are also restricted too.
I blame the club for not giving us the team we need to compete and perform at a better standard.

Don't like that we've basically one leader in the team and actually stated a few days ago that since losing Benji, Lawrence, Taylor and Eisenhuth there's a great big leadership void.

I feel you're oversimplifying it a little too as despite how you personally regard it, each individual player simply has to own their role or part in the team by either a) promoting the ball or b) defending their line. The coaching staff sets the structures and is served with preparing them. And they're not effectively getting the job done for the team or improving it but IMO it's often looked like we haven't always had the right team on the field.
Even the interchanges are worrisome, as when someone's usually kept on too long and off their feet, he is then always the person responsible for letting in a try.

Edit: Oops sorry meant oversimplifying his job with team selections and building. I also had a 3000 word analysis or supportive essay to include with it but... Nah just kidding.
Bottom line is we look crap which is a pity when there's been some great individuals standing out and performing consistently strong for us.

Am only starting to blame myself at this point. For having expectations and hope.
[/QUOTE]

@Lauren said:
Your posts are very well expressed and straight from the heart.
But most of them are to damn long.
You're a school teacher.
Condense them.
Maybe make more posts to get your many good points across.
 
@tigerwest said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432531) said:
@mikey said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432517) said:
@tigerwest said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432165) said:
@jc99 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432150) said:
@fish88 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432148) said:
Summed up perfectly by no one at dummy half. That play Joffa dented the line got a quick okay the ball, one metre out with he game on the line, and Boone at dummy half. Sums up this team perfectly. No ability do the 1%ers, and no winners in the side that will lift when needed.

That's on Madge for picking Liddle to play 80 minutes when he clearly can't do it effectively.

Do we know why he wasn't there though? Why didn't Joffa have a look before playing the ball?

But the fact he wasn't there should have been covered by someone, it's one of the most basic football requirements that these blokes would have been doing this all there footy lives?

But some believe that's on the coach who should cover that particular play aspect before every game - sure!!!!!!

Should’ve been who ever was closest to Joffa, it’s so basic I wouldn’t have thought it needed special mention, these blokes are supposed to be first graders.

I said in an earlier post....its always first and foremost to support the ball carrier in attack....if the support was there it wouldnt have mattered who was at dh...we would have players up there and in position to score....
 
@magpies1963 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432549) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432294) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432163) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432075) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432052) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431890) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431801) said:
They are first grade players for godsake. They had every opportunity to win that game just by playing smart footy. That was not a coaching issue tonight that was a team of rudderless dumb arses. Maguire may pay the penalty for that performance, but they were not outcoached or out played by the opposition they beat themselves through stupidity.

Only good preparation can increase the mental toughness and resilience that a few of you are criticising the players for having an absence of. This comes from coaching.
The reinforcements of standards and attitude also stems from coaching, as does encouragement and inspiration.
So stop allotting all blame to the players when tactical and mental preparation derives from the coaching staff's ability to utilise correct tactical and mental preparation methods suited to the team - based on their capability.
Their game plans, strategies (including risk management) and goals are also set under the directive of the him too. So rather than deflect how poor we are due to Madge's systems, at least recognise that he too is responsible for promoting team trust and interaction/cooperation, which we seldom see in a positive light. Then maybe you'd realise that the simple duty of not refining and modifying most of these aspects is the crux of our problems.

We aren't in a position to change all our playing group but we also aren't exactly powerless to change these problems either. Only the coach and his staff can control this. So c'mon what's everyone doing as it's clear the man needs a helping hand with everything.
It's only further humiliating the team (and fans) to continue to persist with it.

Edit : I do think the senior players deserve harsh criticism for poor leadership however, as they not only help reinforce Madge's standards etc they are also responsible for bringing the group together and helping with team cohesion.

Too analytical Lauren. I have never heard a quality player from any team not own a poor performance. That is the only mentality that will change our path and until we develop.a squad of players who own their performances and mean it - more of the same.

A quality player from a quality team is surrounded by and rewarded by excellence.
We look so clueless and uninspired from continuing to select struggling players and not changing tactics. It makes us look like the main attraction in this year's bloody circus.

I get what you're saying, but when the person responsible for managing the team's collective efficacy, group accountability and ability to reset focus is unable to get the team all on the same page it's still his fault regardless how you see it.

I don't think it's just Madge though and feel there's leadership problems from the top - that there's a few who've dropped the ball and are not fulfilling their roles/duties.

Having no dummy half when you are attacking the opposition line with game on the line - sums up this squad. That is not a coaching issue - at FG level that was unacceptable. FG players have to be able to think for themselves during a game a coach can't be responsible for that. They get paid well to represent the club that comes with some ownership of their individual performance.
Maguire may have failed at assembling a squad good enough to compete in the competition and that may cost him the job, but the players last night had every opportunity to win and they didn't get it done.

No offence but I think people within the club are also hindering his capacity to attract certain players. Thought his personal targets of Lomax or Brimson were great prospects.

However he keeps picking Liddle and Mbye for that role and I think most of us have realised how unproductive that's been for the team.
Yeah I agree from our key players (in our spine) there's a lack of control and a commanding presence required to direct the team out of trouble. But they also aren't surrounded by the best support players in the forwards or our backs and are also restricted too.
I blame the club for not giving us the team we need to compete and perform at a better standard.

Don't like that we've basically one leader in the team and actually stated a few days ago that since losing Benji, Lawrence, Taylor and Eisenhuth there's a great big leadership void.

I feel you're oversimplifying it a little too as despite how you personally regard it, each individual player simply has to own their role or part in the team by either a) promoting the ball or b) defending their line. The coaching staff sets the structures and is served with preparing them. And they're not effectively getting the job done for the team or improving it but IMO it's often looked like we haven't always had the right team on the field.
Even the interchanges are worrisome, as when someone's usually kept on too long and off their feet, he is then always the person responsible for letting in a try.

Edit: Oops sorry meant oversimplifying his job with team selections and building. I also had a 3000 word analysis or supportive essay to include with it but... Nah just kidding.
Bottom line is we look crap which is a pity when there's been some great individuals standing out and performing consistently strong for us.

Am only starting to blame myself at this point. For having expectations and hope.

@Lauren said:
Your posts are very well expressed and straight from the heart.
But most of them are to damn long.
You're a school teacher.
Condense them.
Maybe make more posts to get your many good points across.

Magpies, Lauren posts frequently and openly,I dont mind reading long posts especially if they are positive or negative because we all are different with many differing opinions....its what makes us unique...
I understand your frustration of course but as I said we are all different....
 
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432364) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432346) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432294) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432163) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432075) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432052) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431890) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431801) said:
They are first grade players for godsake. They had every opportunity to win that game just by playing smart footy. That was not a coaching issue tonight that was a team of rudderless dumb arses. Maguire may pay the penalty for that performance, but they were not outcoached or out played by the opposition they beat themselves through stupidity.

Only good preparation can increase the mental toughness and resilience that a few of you are criticising the players for having an absence of. This comes from coaching.
The reinforcements of standards and attitude also stems from coaching, as does encouragement and inspiration.
So stop allotting all blame to the players when tactical and mental preparation derives from the coaching staff's ability to utilise correct tactical and mental preparation methods suited to the team - based on their capability.
Their game plans, strategies (including risk management) and goals are also set under the directive of the him too. So rather than deflect how poor we are due to Madge's systems, at least recognise that he too is responsible for promoting team trust and interaction/cooperation, which we seldom see in a positive light. Then maybe you'd realise that the simple duty of not refining and modifying most of these aspects is the crux of our problems.

We aren't in a position to change all our playing group but we also aren't exactly powerless to change these problems either. Only the coach and his staff can control this. So c'mon what's everyone doing as it's clear the man needs a helping hand with everything.
It's only further humiliating the team (and fans) to continue to persist with it.

Edit : I do think the senior players deserve harsh criticism for poor leadership however, as they not only help reinforce Madge's standards etc they are also responsible for bringing the group together and helping with team cohesion.

Too analytical Lauren. I have never heard a quality player from any team not own a poor performance. That is the only mentality that will change our path and until we develop.a squad of players who own their performances and mean it - more of the same.

A quality player from a quality team is surrounded by and rewarded by excellence.
We look so clueless and uninspired from continuing to select struggling players and not changing tactics. It makes us look like the main attraction in this year's bloody circus.

I get what you're saying, but when the person responsible for managing the team's collective efficacy, group accountability and ability to reset focus is unable to get the team all on the same page it's still his fault regardless how you see it.

I don't think it's just Madge though and feel there's leadership problems from the top - that there's a few who've dropped the ball and are not fulfilling their roles/duties.

Having no dummy half when you are attacking the opposition line with game on the line - sums up this squad. That is not a coaching issue - at FG level that was unacceptable. FG players have to be able to think for themselves during a game a coach can't be responsible for that. They get paid well to represent the club that comes with some ownership of their individual performance.
Maguire may have failed at assembling a squad good enough to compete in the competition and that may cost him the job, but the players last night had every opportunity to win and they didn't get it done.

No offence but I think people within the club are also hindering his capacity to attract certain players. Thought his personal targets of Lomax or Brimson were great prospects.

However he keeps picking Liddle and Mbye for that role and I think most of us have realised how unproductive that's been for the team.
Yeah I agree from our key players (in our spine) there's a lack of control and a commanding presence required to direct the team out of trouble. But they also aren't surrounded by the best support players in the forwards or our backs and are also restricted too.
I blame the club for not giving us the team we need to compete and perform at a better standard.

Don't like that we've basically one leader in the team and actually stated a few days ago that since losing Benji, Lawrence, Taylor and Eisenhuth there's a great big leadership void.

I feel you're oversimplifying it a little too as despite how you personally regard it, each individual player simply has to own their role or part in the team by either a) promoting the ball or b) defending their line. The coaching staff sets the structures and is served with preparing them. And they're not effectively getting the job done for the team or improving it but IMO it's often looked like we haven't always had the right team on the field.
Even the interchanges are worrisome, as when someone's usually kept on too long and off their feet, he is then always the person responsible for letting in a try.

The difference between the best teams and the rest is that they have a nucleus of players that have the attributes to execute game plans and control games through adversity and we dont.

Thanks for the healthy debate but this is where I bow out.
Look at all the effort we put into being heard in showing our support to the team/coach/players or whoever and we only wind up getting into the same arguments with someone else that is just as frustrated as us?
Was good to hear your perspective though.

Thanks for your contribution.
 
@magpies1963 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432549) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432294) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432163) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432075) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432052) said:
@lauren said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431890) said:
@telltails said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431801) said:
They are first grade players for godsake. They had every opportunity to win that game just by playing smart footy. That was not a coaching issue tonight that was a team of rudderless dumb arses. Maguire may pay the penalty for that performance, but they were not outcoached or out played by the opposition they beat themselves through stupidity.

Only good preparation can increase the mental toughness and resilience that a few of you are criticising the players for having an absence of. This comes from coaching.
The reinforcements of standards and attitude also stems from coaching, as does encouragement and inspiration.
So stop allotting all blame to the players when tactical and mental preparation derives from the coaching staff's ability to utilise correct tactical and mental preparation methods suited to the team - based on their capability.
Their game plans, strategies (including risk management) and goals are also set under the directive of the him too. So rather than deflect how poor we are due to Madge's systems, at least recognise that he too is responsible for promoting team trust and interaction/cooperation, which we seldom see in a positive light. Then maybe you'd realise that the simple duty of not refining and modifying most of these aspects is the crux of our problems.

We aren't in a position to change all our playing group but we also aren't exactly powerless to change these problems either. Only the coach and his staff can control this. So c'mon what's everyone doing as it's clear the man needs a helping hand with everything.
It's only further humiliating the team (and fans) to continue to persist with it.

Edit : I do think the senior players deserve harsh criticism for poor leadership however, as they not only help reinforce Madge's standards etc they are also responsible for bringing the group together and helping with team cohesion.

Too analytical Lauren. I have never heard a quality player from any team not own a poor performance. That is the only mentality that will change our path and until we develop.a squad of players who own their performances and mean it - more of the same.

A quality player from a quality team is surrounded by and rewarded by excellence.
We look so clueless and uninspired from continuing to select struggling players and not changing tactics. It makes us look like the main attraction in this year's bloody circus.

I get what you're saying, but when the person responsible for managing the team's collective efficacy, group accountability and ability to reset focus is unable to get the team all on the same page it's still his fault regardless how you see it.

I don't think it's just Madge though and feel there's leadership problems from the top - that there's a few who've dropped the ball and are not fulfilling their roles/duties.

Having no dummy half when you are attacking the opposition line with game on the line - sums up this squad. That is not a coaching issue - at FG level that was unacceptable. FG players have to be able to think for themselves during a game a coach can't be responsible for that. They get paid well to represent the club that comes with some ownership of their individual performance.
Maguire may have failed at assembling a squad good enough to compete in the competition and that may cost him the job, but the players last night had every opportunity to win and they didn't get it done.

No offence but I think people within the club are also hindering his capacity to attract certain players. Thought his personal targets of Lomax or Brimson were great prospects.

However he keeps picking Liddle and Mbye for that role and I think most of us have realised how unproductive that's been for the team.
Yeah I agree from our key players (in our spine) there's a lack of control and a commanding presence required to direct the team out of trouble. But they also aren't surrounded by the best support players in the forwards or our backs and are also restricted too.
I blame the club for not giving us the team we need to compete and perform at a better standard.

Don't like that we've basically one leader in the team and actually stated a few days ago that since losing Benji, Lawrence, Taylor and Eisenhuth there's a great big leadership void.

I feel you're oversimplifying it a little too as despite how you personally regard it, each individual player simply has to own their role or part in the team by either a) promoting the ball or b) defending their line. The coaching staff sets the structures and is served with preparing them. And they're not effectively getting the job done for the team or improving it but IMO it's often looked like we haven't always had the right team on the field.
Even the interchanges are worrisome, as when someone's usually kept on too long and off their feet, he is then always the person responsible for letting in a try.

Edit: Oops sorry meant oversimplifying his job with team selections and building. I also had a 3000 word analysis or supportive essay to include with it but... Nah just kidding.
Bottom line is we look crap which is a pity when there's been some great individuals standing out and performing consistently strong for us.

Am only starting to blame myself at this point. For having expectations and hope.

@Lauren said:
Your posts are very well expressed and straight from the heart.
But most of them are to damn long.
You're a school teacher.
Condense them.
Maybe make more posts to get your many good points across.

Short attention span ay @MAGPIES1963?
 
It was a big fail that cost the team the game, so instead of learning from it they tried it again, my point being that the team does not learn from its mistakes
 
@tigerwest said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432531) said:
@mikey said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432517) said:
@tigerwest said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432165) said:
@jc99 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432150) said:
@fish88 said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1432148) said:
Summed up perfectly by no one at dummy half. That play Joffa dented the line got a quick okay the ball, one metre out with he game on the line, and Boone at dummy half. Sums up this team perfectly. No ability do the 1%ers, and no winners in the side that will lift when needed.

That's on Madge for picking Liddle to play 80 minutes when he clearly can't do it effectively.

Do we know why he wasn't there though? Why didn't Joffa have a look before playing the ball?

But the fact he wasn't there should have been covered by someone, it's one of the most basic football requirements that these blokes would have been doing this all there footy lives?

But some believe that's on the coach who should cover that particular play aspect before every game - sure!!!!!!

Should’ve been who ever was closest to Joffa, it’s so basic I wouldn’t have thought it needed special mention, these blokes are supposed to be first graders.

"You do it".
"No you that's not my job".
Don't worry the coach will wear it. It's not our fault we didnt practice that at training"
 
@tilllindemann said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431734) said:
@glange said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431623) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431598) said:
Losing Daine Lauire was a massive turning point so early in the game. I truly believe that if he played the game, we win handsomely. The real issue, though, is how poorly individuals failed to adapt to losing the strike attacking player. We needed leadership and stability and much more from Adam Doueihi in this respect. I'm sorry to say that I think he's is a lazy footballer and, just when we needed him to stand up and take control, he went missing. I know it's not fair to single any one player out, but of those who could have made the difference after the loss of Laurie, he disappointed me the most.

Watch other teams lose players against the worst competition. They still win.

Yeah but other teams have other good players. We can't afford to lose Laurie because 90% of the rest of the team are useless bozos. If Laurie is out for the season we won't win another game this year.

Just my opinion. I think you are incorrect.
 
@tilllindemann said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431734) said:
@glange said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431623) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Coach can't train intelligence\.](/post/1431598) said:
Losing Daine Lauire was a massive turning point so early in the game. I truly believe that if he played the game, we win handsomely. The real issue, though, is how poorly individuals failed to adapt to losing the strike attacking player. We needed leadership and stability and much more from Adam Doueihi in this respect. I'm sorry to say that I think he's is a lazy footballer and, just when we needed him to stand up and take control, he went missing. I know it's not fair to single any one player out, but of those who could have made the difference after the loss of Laurie, he disappointed me the most.

Watch other teams lose players against the worst competition. They still win.

Yeah but other teams have other good players. We can't afford to lose Laurie because 90% of the rest of the team are useless bozos. If Laurie is out for the season we won't win another game this year.

I enjoyed this description
 
the players last night had every opportunity to win and they didn’t get it done.

How do you explain the following factors:-

1. No hooker on the bench to replace Liddle.
2. The short drop outs
3. Luc never getting interchanged

These issues are all poor tactics. That is the domain of the coach.

I'm not even stating sack the coach but it's clear that he is struggling with tactics. It's pretty unacceptable as a first grade coach to make those mistakes.

Point 1. Mbye to hooker to rest Liddle, Cheeky to centre for Mbye or second row if needed. Laurie injured 2nd min in.
Outcome: Liddell gets full game, Mbye fullback 78 min, Cheeky centre 78min. Come on brother give the coach some respect. I believe the biggest lesson is learned by Laurie, let the forwards do the forwards work early in the game.

Point 2. Was coach trusting players to make the right decision and not micro managing drop out situations.

Point 3. See point 1.

Our team was too young and inexperienced for this game. I was surprised we were even in the contest. Stop over estimating the quality of players that we had on the field or have at our disposal. We are young and dumb!

This is the best thread created since I’ve been following this site, which in excess of 15 years. Go Weststigers!
 

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top