@CocaCola said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1240884) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1240025) said:
@CocaCola said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1238537) said:
These graphs tell the story.
Covid-19 testing is severely flawed resulting in majority of false positives results. The graphs clearly indicate no direct relation between cases & deaths since day 1.
I will repeat myself, out of all the 'Covid' deaths to date, 94% of those deaths have been reported as having previous underlying health issues, you know the type of health issues that make up the majority of death stats on a yearly basis.
In Australia, 19 people under the age of 60 have reportedly died from Covid, only 5 of those under the age of 50. Not quite the 'deadly' virus some bang on about. This also doesn't take into consideration that some of those had underlying health issues.
The media needs to stop this nonsense of reporting 'new daily cases' the stats say it means nothing!.
https://images2.imgbox.com/a8/f3/UcYNIQ07_o.png
https://images2.imgbox.com/7e/57/EGGWsUoE_o.png
Sources:
https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data
https://www.health.gov.au/news/health-alerts/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-health-alert/coronavirus-covid-19-current-situation-and-case-numbers#cases-and-deaths-by-age-and-sex
Mate those graphs DO tell the story, the same story as the CDC etc are reporting, trouble is you dont know how to read a graph or understand mathematics.
Those graphs show a clear correlation between cases and deaths and they are running around 1% of cases which is about right. Those graphs look a bit weird because of the scale which doesnt provide detail of the smaller data set (deaths) but it looks right...about 1-2%
CDC reported only 6% of the 'covid' deaths are related to Covid alone. 94% of the death stats have been serious underlying health issues..
This is not accurate. CDC reported that 94% of deaths had underlying co-morbidities not "serious underlying health issues". These comorbidities include conditions such as high blood pressure, that many people walk around without knowing. If you get a serious health impact (such as COVID) this can overwhelm your system and kill you but this very different to "they were going to die anyway" of those co morbidities.
Explain why the daily death rate hasn't spiked while the daily confirmed cases has over time. Where is this 1-2% ratio you speak of?
https://images2.imgbox.com/7e/57/EGGWsUoE_o.png
Daily death rates have followed closely to confirmed cases with the time lag of at least 14-21 days which is the average time it takes to die. Some take longer. The 1-2% ration is there in the image you are using to "prove" its wrong 1% of 300,000 is 3,000 which is exactly where the graph shows it. The reason that the lower graph (death) looks flat is because of the scale of the graph. YOu also have to factor into that the time delay to die.
Take your blinkers off, majority of the covid death stats have been elderly people with underlying chronic conditions such as heart disease, respiratory issues and other severe illnesses.
I agree the VAST majority of COVID deaths are people older than 60. You should go and have a look at what the CDC are calling comorbidities though. You cant assume they are all on the verge of a heart attack. CDC list high blood pressure as a co morbidity.
Hospitals in the US are paid $39,000 if they mark a death by Covid.. Scroll down to the video with Senator Jensen.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/04/24/fact-check-medicare-hospitals-paid-more-covid-19-patients-coronavirus/3000638001/
In Europe and many other countries, they have recently stopped marking deaths by covid in patients who have died with known underlying chronic health issues. It was a flawed stat to begin with.
Please feel free to post your own sources with stats showing how deadly this virus is.. I've heard nothing in Australia apart from retirement homes deaths & the ruby princess since the outbreak, hardly riveting stuff to lock down the country.
650 of 872 deaths in Aus have been related to Aged Care. You are making an analytical error in using "post lockdown" numbers to justify or otherwise whether or not a lockdown was necessary. If we didnt lockdown, these numbers would have been MUCH higher. I was tracking the numbers early in Mar-April and prelockdown the case numbers were following a very predictable path of exponential growth. This exponential growth would have resulted in expenential increase in deaths.
With regards to your whole argument regarding COVID deaths being overstated due to co morbidities, the CDC did an analysis of this as well and did a study of "excess" deaths (deaths over and above those to be expected by normal demographics and existing morbidities). This shows there have been between 207,000 and 270,000 additional deaths since 1/02/2020 than the normal expectation based on demographics. This correlates pretty closely with the reported death number of 209,000 in the US.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
No one is saying covid doesn't exist, it may just be a more contagious strain of influenza.. Influenza kills too, we don't lock down borders over that do we?
COVID at the moment is 20 x deadlier that Influenza. The mortality rate for influenza in the US in 2017 was 20 per 1M population for an entire year. The mortality rate right now (POST LOCKDOWN) for COVID is 632 per 1M population over 8 months. If we didnt lockdown it would of course be higher.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/flu.htm
Fear mongering at its best.. Wake up
Mate I dont need to be woke. I am capable of reading and analysing actual data and parsing what it means. I dont need to rely on youtube videos. I suggest you get your data from more reliable sources and extrapolate your own opinions.