@Tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1135742) said:@Tigerboy said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1135735) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1135730) said:@Tigerboy said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1135699) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1135677) said:@twentyforty said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1135674) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1135657) said:@weststigers said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1135578) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1135574) said:Im nervous about this shutdown working. As Ive bored everyone with already, I have been tracking the confirmed cases mathematically since 10/03/20. It has been growing exponentially at a terrifyingly steady rate.
Exponential simply means that each data set is growing by a multiple on the last one. When I started tracking it was growing at an exponential multiplier of 1.23. Since then the multiplier has barely moved and totals I forecast over a week ago are accurate each day +/- 10 or so. Its scary to me how constant the rate of growth is.
Here is the table of the confirmed cases

OVer the last week the multiplier for each day has been 1.20, 1.25, 1.25, 1.23, 1.25, 1.23 and 1.26 today. It just doesnt change.
To give you an idea of how critical this multiplier number is, when I started the forecast on the 10th Mar , the forecast total for 10 April was 77, 326. If it continues at todays multiplier of 1.26, the total on 10 April will be 119,149. If we can keep it at 1.2 it would drop to 48,000. It makes a massive difference, but so far it wont budge.
Here is a graph of the multiplier

We need that line to dip below 1.0 urgently but so far no sign of it. Lets hope in a week or so these new arrangements start to filter through to this data.
What are your thoughts on the recovery rate against the multiplier?
It seems to take a long time to recover which looks like it will eventually create a backlog? I.e. even if we get to under 1, we'll still be in a bit of trouble in the short/medium term.

The recovery numbers have me stumped tbh. It doesnt make sense. All reports have been that for the 80%+ of cases that dont require hospitalisation (95%+ in Aus), its a mild illness that you are over in less than 2 weeks. There are only 13 people in hospital in Australia with COVID but our reported recoveries are only 118 out of 1800. Doesnt make sense and seems to be the same thing worldwide in reporting.
I dont get it.
Could it be that new cases are arriving faster than recoveries? If it takes 14 days to recover and only hours to discover a newly infectEd patient. Is that the correlation you’re questioning?
Ah yes you are on it of course. It actually does make sense. I was simply thinking it doesnt make sense that only 118 cases are reported as recovered out of 1800 but I wasnt taking into consideration that 14 days ago there were only 112 cases, so now that does start to make sense.
So, not many “recovering” based on the symptoms listed and an unknown period of time that people may be contagious for? Sounds like a pretty bad trend for us to be following...
Problem is the numbers are becoming quite consistent in most places - people are very sick.
The mild cases, IMO, must make up only %60 yet for some reason even they aren’t being listed as recovering cases yet. Seems to me that the initial word on this was right & consistent criteria for testing may be an issue - believe we may have been exposed for a lot longer - and shortages
I dont think I made my answer clear enough. My point is if it takes 14 days to recover (even mild cases), there were only 112 cases reported 14 days ago, so 118 recovered cases sounds about right for that timeframe.
Don’t think there’s any actual evidence for that being the end of infectious potential for a person, hence why my answer intimates that it’s crucial we get better data and clearer projections. I.E for this ‘exponential growth’ you continue to speak of, whether we like it or not, is an unknown.
Just want families to be protected and based on scientific estimates it actually doesn’t seem that any particular group will remain at all safe it the spread and ferocity of disease holds up...
Not a ‘say your prayers’ situation, but to try and guess and go off whatever governments have somewhat accurate results ATM is a little short-sighted and nobody can afford to go half cocked.
There is plenty of evidence of the exponential growth of cases, thats a fact. I merely pointing out two things. The reported recovery time for this virus is about 14 days. The numbers reported as "recovered" pretty much line up exactly with the number of cases on that exponential curve, 14 days ago, so that makes a lot of sense.
Wasn’t in any way debating the numbers mate! Merely saying that human error reflects in a lot of the ‘poorer’, inconsistent and unreliable data that we’ve seen from many countries so far.
They will all line up in a few weeks to months and that is a definitive scientific fact.