The interesting thing about The Australian article is that it is probably 100% accurate whilst at the same time possibly being totally misleading.
I'm sure that most people who read that article will think that these irresponsible people went to the BLM march, caught Covid 19 and then spread it through this Melbourne tower block. But of course the article doesn't say that. It says this:
"Health authorities have confirmed a link between two COVID-19 cases in people who attended the Black Lives Matter protest in Melbourne and the public housing tower cluster."
So, some people who went to the BLM march ultimately contracted Covid 19 somewhere and they live in, or are linked to people who live in, the Melbourne tower block.
Now, I can't get through the pay wall to see if that article contains anything more specific but if anyone here can, I'm quite happy to be corrected.
In the meantime I'll rely on the statements made by Prof. Brett Sutton that the genome of the virus detected in this latest outbreak was not present in Australia at the time of the BLM march.
No ambiguity in that statement.
Just do a Google search on the words in the above link, then you should be able to read it after removing the subscription pop up. You will then find as you suspected, in that it is just a further episode of an unsubstantiated narrative to their flock.
Ill give you another chance, what is the narrative and why is it convenient. What is the advantage that anyone gains by incorrectly linking the spikes to the BLM marches? What ideology exactly benefits? Ill ask directly....are you implying (or otherwise) that it is a racist narrative?