Coronavirus Outbreak

Status
Not open for further replies.
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429696) said:
@tigger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429645) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429469) said:
@tigger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429438) said:
I reckon percentage of population being vaccinated is not the correct metric for opening up.
How can it be reasonable to open up before every person in the country (including children) has been given the opportunity to be fully vaccinated?
Once we reach that point I'm happy for lockdowns to cease. Sensible restrictions, such as masks in indoor public spaces and mandatory vaccination for some occupations (e.g. age care workers) should continue.
A decent quarantine system for incoming travellers would need to be in place. Not this hotel quarantine rubbish.
I would also be happy for access restrictions to apply to unvaccinated people. Yep, sure they've got rights, but so do the rest of us and their rights don't outweigh ours
.

And your rights don't out weight there's

Best bet wait till Christmas everyone has had the chance to get the Jab those who don't that's their risk and those who have that's there risk as well let's remember the Nuremberg trials


We won't get to 60 percent let alone 50

No, generally speaking my individual rights don't outweigh anybody else's.

But, on the other hand, our individual rights have always been constrained to ensure that we act in a way that is for the general good of our society.

I have a right to drive a car, but only if I'm duly licensed because it's not in society's best interest for it to be otherwise.

I have a right to perform maintenance on my property, but not if it's electrical or plumbing, unless I'm duly licensed, because it's not in society's best interest for it to be otherwise.

And some time in the future, when we've all had the opportunity to be fully vaccinated against Covid 19, our right to go to restaurants or to events may be constrained by whether or not we have opted to be vaccinated. I won't have a problem with that, because I believe it to be in the best interest of our society.



A mate of mine is a paramedic and has been told that if he is not vaccinated by September he will not lose his job but can not go out in the ambulance to help people and where he works alot of the ambulance paramedics feel the same won't get vaccinated

What's your answer to that ?

The question of whether vaccination should be compulsory for certain categories of workers is certainly a vexed one. It's a debate that we're yet to have because, at the moment, we just don't have sufficient vaccines to do the job anyway. But it's a debate that will be had eventually.

Will vaccination eventually become compulsory for paramedics? I don't know. I have no expertise in that area. I would have thought so, because they would regularly come into contact with people whose immune systems have been compromised. If the question was as simple as "Is the right of a paramedic to remain unvaccinated greater than the right of a patient to stay alive?", then I think the answer would obviously be "No". But I really don't know and there are probably other factors that come into play.

In general terms our individual rights are constrained where they interfere with rights of others to live their lives in a safe environment.

However, in the event that your mate opts to remain unvaccinated he may eventually have to miss out on attending some events, which was the point of my original comments. Compulsory vaccination is another issue altogether.
 
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429738) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429737) said:
bitchute

"BitChute is a video hosting service known for accommodating far-right individuals and conspiracy theorists, and for hosting hate speech."

What do you think?


It's very spicy a little crazy some funny bits and some information watch this if you get some time ....but there is some craziness there like watching the main stream news

https://www.bitchute.com/video/NkiM9fo1Ba0h/
 
@innsaneink said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429739) said:
Campsie

![2f446de1-9d63-427e-83c4-e1bc924f325a-image.png](/assets/uploads/files/1627544990413-2f446de1-9d63-427e-83c4-e1bc924f325a-image.png)

Love it that will drive the vaccination numbers up
 
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429743) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429738) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429737) said:
bitchute

"BitChute is a video hosting service known for accommodating far-right individuals and conspiracy theorists, and for hosting hate speech."

What do you think?


It's very spicy a little crazy some funny bits and some information watch this if you get some time ....but there is some craziness there like watching the main stream news

https://www.bitchute.com/video/NkiM9fo1Ba0h/

I'll stick to genuine science based sites thanks.
 
@mighty_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429730) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429714) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429695) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429690) said:
@tigger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429645) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429469) said:
@tigger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429438) said:
I reckon percentage of population being vaccinated is not the correct metric for opening up.
How can it be reasonable to open up before every person in the country (including children) has been given the opportunity to be fully vaccinated?
Once we reach that point I'm happy for lockdowns to cease. Sensible restrictions, such as masks in indoor public spaces and mandatory vaccination for some occupations (e.g. age care workers) should continue.
A decent quarantine system for incoming travellers would need to be in place. Not this hotel quarantine rubbish.
I would also be happy for access restrictions to apply to unvaccinated people. Yep, sure they've got rights, but so do the rest of us and their rights don't outweigh ours
.

And your rights don't out weight there's

Best bet wait till Christmas everyone has had the chance to get the Jab those who don't that's their risk and those who have that's there risk as well let's remember the Nuremberg trials


We won't get to 60 percent let alone 50

No, generally speaking my individual rights don't outweigh anybody else's.

But, on the other hand, our individual rights have always been constrained to ensure that we act in a way that is for the general good of our society.

I have a right to drive a car, but only if I'm duly licensed because it's not in society's best interest for it to be otherwise.

I have a right to perform maintenance on my property, but not if it's electrical or plumbing, unless I'm duly licensed, because it's not in society's best interest for it to be otherwise.

And some time in the future, when we've all had the opportunity to be fully vaccinated against Covid 19, our right to go to restaurants or to events may be constrained by whether or not we have opted to be vaccinated. I won't have a problem with that, because I believe it to be in the best interest of our society.

I respect your right to your opinion but there is no way we will get to 60 percent vaccinated on an experimental vaccine so what do you do with the millions of people they all go live in Queensland or make an unvaccinated state inside of Australia and put up a fence around them ?

Please tell me what we do ?

Maybe you should start reading about real science.

"It’s important not to confuse not knowing everything with knowing nothing. The safety data on the mRNA vaccines is robust."

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/spike-proteins-covid-19-and-vaccines/

Mike I like you your robust and education and have a thick skin but please look at all angles

The professors who say it's not safe have no financial gain they will lose big time $$$$

And the people who will gain $$$$ say it's safe

I will wait until stage 4 is over and make a decision

Just out of curiosity do you get the Flu shot each year?

Doesn't the fact that it changes each year make it experimental and never fully tested?
 
@harvey said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429631) said:
Gladys has ballsed this up miserably.

No enforcement/rules around high risk employment (transporting foreign flight crews), knows within days how contagious it is through footage of it being spread through people walking through the same space.

No mask mandate, no lockdown of any impacted areas, waits for the cases to get to the point where contract tracers can no longer keep pace with investigating new cases before any significant lockdown.

Is there a mandated number of cases/contact point before a LGA is considered high risk? Those in strict lockdown do seem to have a number of common factors.

Note a number of venues of concern in Belrose, Gordon, Leichhardt, Haymarkey, Sydney & Ultimo, and the restrictions there are not as tight.

Division is being seeded and that along with individual frustrations ranging from resistance to desperation will be a large driver of non-compliance. We are either all in this together for the common good or we are are telling others to just suck it up because they are in certain LGA's with a non-existent disease barrier, whilst viewing pictures of others in queues waiting for coffee maskless in adjoining suburbs.

As for others referring to lower socio economic areas, such have borne the brunt of disease for millennia and for a myriad of different reasons, many of them common.
 
@tigger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429742) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429696) said:
@tigger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429645) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429469) said:
@tigger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429438) said:
I reckon percentage of population being vaccinated is not the correct metric for opening up.
How can it be reasonable to open up before every person in the country (including children) has been given the opportunity to be fully vaccinated?
Once we reach that point I'm happy for lockdowns to cease. Sensible restrictions, such as masks in indoor public spaces and mandatory vaccination for some occupations (e.g. age care workers) should continue.
A decent quarantine system for incoming travellers would need to be in place. Not this hotel quarantine rubbish.
I would also be happy for access restrictions to apply to unvaccinated people. Yep, sure they've got rights, but so do the rest of us and their rights don't outweigh ours
.

And your rights don't out weight there's

Best bet wait till Christmas everyone has had the chance to get the Jab those who don't that's their risk and those who have that's there risk as well let's remember the Nuremberg trials


We won't get to 60 percent let alone 50

No, generally speaking my individual rights don't outweigh anybody else's.

But, on the other hand, our individual rights have always been constrained to ensure that we act in a way that is for the general good of our society.

I have a right to drive a car, but only if I'm duly licensed because it's not in society's best interest for it to be otherwise.

I have a right to perform maintenance on my property, but not if it's electrical or plumbing, unless I'm duly licensed, because it's not in society's best interest for it to be otherwise.

And some time in the future, when we've all had the opportunity to be fully vaccinated against Covid 19, our right to go to restaurants or to events may be constrained by whether or not we have opted to be vaccinated. I won't have a problem with that, because I believe it to be in the best interest of our society.



A mate of mine is a paramedic and has been told that if he is not vaccinated by September he will not lose his job but can not go out in the ambulance to help people and where he works alot of the ambulance paramedics feel the same won't get vaccinated

What's your answer to that ?

The question of whether vaccination should be compulsory for certain categories of workers is certainly a vexed one. It's a debate that we're yet to have because, at the moment, we just don't have sufficient vaccines to do the job anyway. But it's a debate that will be had eventually.

Will vaccination eventually become compulsory for paramedics? I don't know. I have no expertise in that area. I would have thought so, because they would regularly come into contact with people whose immune systems have been compromised. If the question was as simple as "Is the right of a paramedic to remain unvaccinated greater than the right of a patient to stay alive?", then I think the answer would obviously be "No". But I really don't know and there are probably other factors that come into play.

In general terms our individual rights are constrained where they interfere with rights of others to live their lives in a safe environment.

However, in the event that your mate opts to remain unvaccinated he may eventually have to miss out on attending some events, which was the point of my original comments. Compulsory vaccination is another issue altogether.

Not getting vaccinated is a matter of choice, as is the career that you choose to pursue.

Does this person also refuse to be vaccinated for hepatitis and other diseases that they could catch and spread in their line of work.
 
@tigger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429645) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429469) said:
@tigger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429438) said:
I reckon percentage of population being vaccinated is not the correct metric for opening up.
How can it be reasonable to open up before every person in the country (including children) has been given the opportunity to be fully vaccinated?
Once we reach that point I'm happy for lockdowns to cease. Sensible restrictions, such as masks in indoor public spaces and mandatory vaccination for some occupations (e.g. age care workers) should continue.
A decent quarantine system for incoming travellers would need to be in place. Not this hotel quarantine rubbish.
I would also be happy for access restrictions to apply to unvaccinated people. Yep, sure they've got rights, but so do the rest of us and their rights don't outweigh ours
.

And your rights don't out weight there's

Best bet wait till Christmas everyone has had the chance to get the Jab those who don't that's their risk and those who have that's there risk as well let's remember the Nuremberg trials


We won't get to 60 percent let alone 50

No, generally speaking my individual rights don't outweigh anybody else's.

But, on the other hand, our individual rights have always been constrained to ensure that we act in a way that is for the general good of our society.

I have a right to drive a car, but only if I'm duly licensed because it's not in society's best interest for it to be otherwise.

I have a right to perform maintenance on my property, but not if it's electrical or plumbing, unless I'm duly licensed, because it's not in society's best interest for it to be otherwise.

And some time in the future, when we've all had the opportunity to be fully vaccinated against Covid 19, our right to go to restaurants or to events may be constrained by whether or not we have opted to be vaccinated. I won't have a problem with that, because I believe it to be in the best interest of our society.

For the common good. Just like the restrictions as enacted in SA and VIC recently, being pretty well universally applied and even more importantly, easily understood.
 
Does anyone have any idea what to do with the millions of Australia's that won't get vaccinated round them up like the Jews in the second world war ? Shoot them ? Split the country in two ?

And unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law

And what about the economy ? Can not have 4 to 5 million people not working and if so the crime rate will go to the moon and the black market economy will rise
 
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429764) said:
Does anyone have any idea what to do with the millions of Australia's that won't get vaccinated round them up like the Jews in the second world war ? Shoot them ? Split the country in two ?

And unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law

And what about the economy ? Can not have 4 to 5 million people not working and if so the crime rate will go to the moon and the black market economy will rise

Only one man can help us....


![images (91).jpeg](/assets/uploads/files/1627546294071-images-91.jpeg)
 
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429764) said:
Does anyone have any idea what to do with the millions of Australia's that won't get vaccinated round them up like the Jews in the second world war ? Shoot them ? Split the country in two ?

And unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law

And what about the economy ? Can not have 4 to 5 million people not working and if so the crime rate will go to the moon and the black market economy will rise

Nobody will be rounding up anybody. You will find over time that people that are not vaccinated, without a genuine medical reason, will be restricted in what activities they can participate in.

While "unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law" the police will.
 
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429773) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429764) said:
Does anyone have any idea what to do with the millions of Australia's that won't get vaccinated round them up like the Jews in the second world war ? Shoot them ? Split the country in two ?

And unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law

And what about the economy ? Can not have 4 to 5 million people not working and if so the crime rate will go to the moon and the black market economy will rise

Nobody will be rounding up anybody. You will find over time that people that are not vaccinated, without a genuine medical reason, will be restricted in what activities they can participate in.

While "unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law" the police will.

Wonder what will happen with life insurance policies for the unvaccinated?
 
@hobbo1 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429778) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429773) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429764) said:
Does anyone have any idea what to do with the millions of Australia's that won't get vaccinated round them up like the Jews in the second world war ? Shoot them ? Split the country in two ?

And unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law

And what about the economy ? Can not have 4 to 5 million people not working and if so the crime rate will go to the moon and the black market economy will rise

Nobody will be rounding up anybody. You will find over time that people that are not vaccinated, without a genuine medical reason, will be restricted in what activities they can participate in.

While "unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law" the police will.

Wonder what will happen with life insurance policies for the unvaccinated?

That wont get cover for Covid19 related issues would be my guess.
 
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429773) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429764) said:
Does anyone have any idea what to do with the millions of Australia's that won't get vaccinated round them up like the Jews in the second world war ? Shoot them ? Split the country in two ?

And unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law

And what about the economy ? Can not have 4 to 5 million people not working and if so the crime rate will go to the moon and the black market economy will rise

Nobody will be rounding up anybody. You will find over time that people that are not vaccinated, without a genuine medical reason, will be restricted in what activities they can participate in.

While "unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law" the police will.

Yea thafs what i reckon

Its preety much guranteed that u wont be ablr to travel overseas if u havent been vaccinated...heck even domestic maybe

Sport games maybe as well might require it

Eventually imo they will give in and get the jab
 
@demps said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429769) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429764) said:
Does anyone have any idea what to do with the millions of Australia's that won't get vaccinated round them up like the Jews in the second world war ? Shoot them ? Split the country in two ?

And unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law

And what about the economy ? Can not have 4 to 5 million people not working and if so the crime rate will go to the moon and the black market economy will rise

Only one man can help us....


![images (91).jpeg](/assets/uploads/files/1627546294071-images-91.jpeg)

But it's a real question ?

I have been to Auschwitz 3 times the first time by train also Ann Frank's house and Dachau

So it's a real question what to do with the unvaccinated people transport them all to Queensland never to leave

And it could be your neighbours the guy at the local store they are everywhere
 
@thedaboss said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429780) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429773) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429764) said:
Does anyone have any idea what to do with the millions of Australia's that won't get vaccinated round them up like the Jews in the second world war ? Shoot them ? Split the country in two ?

And unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law

And what about the economy ? Can not have 4 to 5 million people not working and if so the crime rate will go to the moon and the black market economy will rise

Nobody will be rounding up anybody. You will find over time that people that are not vaccinated, without a genuine medical reason, will be restricted in what activities they can participate in.

While "unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law" the police will.

Yea thafs what i reckon

Its preety much guranteed that u wont be ablr to travel overseas if u havent been vaccinated...heck even domestic maybe

Sport games maybe as well might require it

Eventually imo they will give in and get the jab

Having written what I did, I would hope nothing would come into play until at least the entire population has had a chance to be vaccinated with the vaccine of their choice.
 
@innsaneink said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429739) said:
Campsie

![2f446de1-9d63-427e-83c4-e1bc924f325a-image.png](/assets/uploads/files/1627544990413-2f446de1-9d63-427e-83c4-e1bc924f325a-image.png)

Capitalism
 
@thedaboss said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429780) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429773) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429764) said:
Does anyone have any idea what to do with the millions of Australia's that won't get vaccinated round them up like the Jews in the second world war ? Shoot them ? Split the country in two ?

And unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law

And what about the economy ? Can not have 4 to 5 million people not working and if so the crime rate will go to the moon and the black market economy will rise

Nobody will be rounding up anybody. You will find over time that people that are not vaccinated, without a genuine medical reason, will be restricted in what activities they can participate in.

While "unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law" the police will.

Yea thafs what i reckon

Its preety much guranteed that u wont be ablr to travel overseas if u havent been vaccinated...heck even domestic maybe

Sport games maybe as well might require it

Eventually imo they will give in and get the jab

It won't stand up in court the Nuremberg trials
 
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429784) said:
@thedaboss said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429780) said:
@mike said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429773) said:
@radoush said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1429764) said:
Does anyone have any idea what to do with the millions of Australia's that won't get vaccinated round them up like the Jews in the second world war ? Shoot them ? Split the country in two ?

And unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law

And what about the economy ? Can not have 4 to 5 million people not working and if so the crime rate will go to the moon and the black market economy will rise

Nobody will be rounding up anybody. You will find over time that people that are not vaccinated, without a genuine medical reason, will be restricted in what activities they can participate in.

While "unvaccinated business owners they won't enforce the law" the police will.

Yea thafs what i reckon

Its preety much guranteed that u wont be ablr to travel overseas if u havent been vaccinated...heck even domestic maybe

Sport games maybe as well might require it

Eventually imo they will give in and get the jab

It won't stand up in court the Nuremberg trials

Cocaine is a hellava drug
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top