I think we are a batsman short. India included an extra batter for this test and won
I think we're two bats short.
I'd be tempted to even give Handsome Pete a run behind the pegs and bring in Patterson and Khawaja.
Our four bowlers are taking 20 wickets comfortably, Marsh is useless with the ball and we're better off sending out a traffic cone with a bat. Wade gave it up when the game was on the line. Renshaw got done by a jaffa, S. Marsh was unlucky I thought, Warner got off to his start and then failed to kick on.
We still very nearly won, had we got Pujara or Rahane early it'd have been a totally different game.
I didn't watch because I was at work but I get the feeling that we might have been slightly impatient looking at the strike rates
We're very competitive which many (myself included,) never gave us a chance of being when the squad was named.
We're still brittle in the batting. I don't see Handscomb being any worse behind the pegs or with the bat than Wade, which frees up a spot for another bat, and dumping M. Marsh opens another.
We could feasibly bat all the way down to Starc at #8 and still have an attack that will be more than capable of rolling them. We have capable part timers in Warner and Smith.