Daine Laurie #237

@cktiger said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373820) said:
@demps said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373443) said:
1 Laurie

6 Hynes

If we are lucky enough to get Hynes I'd play him at fullback and put Laurie into the 6.
Reminds me of Jerome Luai, although I don't think Brooks could play a similar role to Cleary.
Hastings would suit him.
Saying that, I'd keep him at the back until we get somebody at least as good to replace him.

It's a Laurie bashing thread and you work a quick right into Brooks.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373864) said:
@cktiger said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373820) said:
@demps said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373443) said:
1 Laurie

6 Hynes

If we are lucky enough to get Hynes I'd play him at fullback and put Laurie into the 6.
Reminds me of Jerome Luai, although I don't think Brooks could play a similar role to Cleary.
Hastings would suit him.
Saying that, I'd keep him at the back until we get somebody at least as good to replace him.

It's a Laurie bashing thread and you work a quick right into Brooks.

This isn't a Laurie bashing thread? It's the opposite if anything...
 
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373867) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373864) said:
@cktiger said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373820) said:
@demps said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373443) said:
1 Laurie

6 Hynes

If we are lucky enough to get Hynes I'd play him at fullback and put Laurie into the 6.
Reminds me of Jerome Luai, although I don't think Brooks could play a similar role to Cleary.
Hastings would suit him.
Saying that, I'd keep him at the back until we get somebody at least as good to replace him.

It's a Laurie bashing thread and you work a quick right into Brooks.

This isn't a Laurie bashing thread? It's the opposite if anything...

It's a move Laurie to 5/8 thread so those wanting Hynes can work him into their imaginary teams, Laurie is a fine fullback. We're lucky to have him.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373869) said:
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373867) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373864) said:
@cktiger said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373820) said:
@demps said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373443) said:
1 Laurie

6 Hynes

If we are lucky enough to get Hynes I'd play him at fullback and put Laurie into the 6.
Reminds me of Jerome Luai, although I don't think Brooks could play a similar role to Cleary.
Hastings would suit him.
Saying that, I'd keep him at the back until we get somebody at least as good to replace him.

It's a Laurie bashing thread and you work a quick right into Brooks.

This isn't a Laurie bashing thread? It's the opposite if anything...

It's a move Laurie to 5/8 thread so those wanting Hynes can work him into their imaginary teams, Laurie is a fine fullback. We're lucky to have him.

I made the thread and that was not my intention. I couldn't care less about Hynes. It's about Laurie. I think he's a 6 and will play better and have a better career as a 6.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373864) said:
@cktiger said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373820) said:
@demps said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373443) said:
1 Laurie

6 Hynes

If we are lucky enough to get Hynes I'd play him at fullback and put Laurie into the 6.
Reminds me of Jerome Luai, although I don't think Brooks could play a similar role to Cleary.
Hastings would suit him.
Saying that, I'd keep him at the back until we get somebody at least as good to replace him.

It's a Laurie bashing thread and you work a quick right into Brooks.

Wasn’t the intention, just mentioning playing styles.
PS I didn’t downvote you lol
 
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373873) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373869) said:
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373867) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373864) said:
@cktiger said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373820) said:
@demps said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373443) said:
1 Laurie

6 Hynes

If we are lucky enough to get Hynes I'd play him at fullback and put Laurie into the 6.
Reminds me of Jerome Luai, although I don't think Brooks could play a similar role to Cleary.
Hastings would suit him.
Saying that, I'd keep him at the back until we get somebody at least as good to replace him.

It's a Laurie bashing thread and you work a quick right into Brooks.

This isn't a Laurie bashing thread? It's the opposite if anything...

It's a move Laurie to 5/8 thread so those wanting Hynes can work him into their imaginary teams, Laurie is a fine fullback. We're lucky to have him.

I made the thread and that was not my intention. I couldn't care less about Hynes. It's about Laurie. I think he's a 6 and will play better and have a better career as a 6.

Simple serious question. Why? What have you seen that gives you that impression? His defence? His size?
 
@tiger5150 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373880) said:
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373873) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373869) said:
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373867) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373864) said:
@cktiger said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373820) said:
@demps said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373443) said:
1 Laurie

6 Hynes

If we are lucky enough to get Hynes I'd play him at fullback and put Laurie into the 6.
Reminds me of Jerome Luai, although I don't think Brooks could play a similar role to Cleary.
Hastings would suit him.
Saying that, I'd keep him at the back until we get somebody at least as good to replace him.

It's a Laurie bashing thread and you work a quick right into Brooks.

This isn't a Laurie bashing thread? It's the opposite if anything...

It's a move Laurie to 5/8 thread so those wanting Hynes can work him into their imaginary teams, Laurie is a fine fullback. We're lucky to have him.

I made the thread and that was not my intention. I couldn't care less about Hynes. It's about Laurie. I think he's a 6 and will play better and have a better career as a 6.

Simple serious question. Why? What have you seen that gives you that impression? His defence? His size?

The description of solid and safe in a team travelling so poorly with so little NRL experience augers well for WTs and Laurie. He's done some very nice things with the ball in our attack. He needs work in defence but most young backs do.
 
Don't think Laurie would handle the defensive workload required of a 6 in the NRL..then again neither can Doueihi or Mbye so why not..
 
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373834) said:
@hammertime said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373825) said:
I can't recall the bloke dropping 1 catch yet and we all want to move him.

His ball security is superb and we all seem to be looking at his attack (which is damn good also). Especially his ball paying.

So what if he loses a few meters when he hits the line. In a few years he'll be either strong enough to bust a few or have the legs to avoid it altogether.

Leave Laurie where he is. We have way too much chopping and changing already.

It's not really where I am coming from. Darren Lockyer was a great fullback, but he was an Immortal when moved to 6. Laurie has the traits of a Cliffy Lyons type five-eighth. This isn't about him being a bad fullback. This is about playing our highest potential attacking player in the most impactful position.

Darren Lockyer wasn't moved to 5/8th until he was 27, Laurie is 21.
 
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373834) said:
Laurie has the traits of a Cliffy Lyons type five-eighth.

He hasn't looked anything like Cliffy to me. Lyons could create a try out of nothing. Cliffy would pull off the most amazing pass and then drop the ball cold the next play. Laurie has been pretty safe without the magic that Cliffy had.
 
can we leave arguably our best player this year in the position where he's been playing decent footy please. we need outside backs. once we recruit some decent ones that know how to defend you'll see a change in results for this football team. Laurie is our fullback for the next 10 years, Doueihi is our five-eighth for the next 10 years. that's it.
 
@jrtiger said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373947) said:
Laurie is our fullback for the next 10 years, Doueihi is our five-eighth for the next 10 years. that’s it.

Let's wait and see but these two guys are good players.
 
I think the plan will be Hastings 7 and Brooks 6 for 2022. If Brooks doesn't perform then Madden or possibly Laurie to 6. Hastings isn't the fastest so having he and douehi in the halves wouldn't work, I personally like AD at centre .
 
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373535) said:
Wait and see. The dude is clearly a 6. Plays like a 6, looks like a 6. He's not a modern fullback. He is built nothing like an elite fullback. He looks and plays like Jerome Luai or Kodi Nikorima. I am not even really saying to play him at 6, I am just saying 6 is clearly his best position, it's written literally all over the kid. His ceiling is pretty good fullback, but if he gets to play at 6 his ceiling is muuuuch higher. He has physical limitations that will prevent him from becoming a dominant fullback imo.

A courageous and spot on post.
 
@tigger19 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373954) said:
I think the plan will be Hastings 7 and Brooks 6 for 2022. If Brooks doesn't perform then Madden or possibly Laurie to 6. Hastings isn't the fastest so having he and douehi in the halves wouldn't work, I personally like AD at centre .

I think Brooks 7 and Hastings 5/8, AD at centre with the pom, all depending who we obtain through Hartigan in the next 6mths. Alternative Brooks, Madden as halves, Simkin 9 and Hastings lock.
 
Haven't seen too many games live but he doesn't seem to talk much. Brooks and Laurie would seem a very submissive combo. They'd both just pass to each other on the last tackle saying "Na you go first"
 
Only tigers fans would consider moving one of our players from the most solidified positions even when he’s doing well and in his rookie season.


The same tigers fans saying his attack would be better at 6 even tho we haven’t seen a kicking game yet. Much more importantly the defence Side of playing in the halves? Can Laurie tackle forwards all game? Not sure if anyone has realised, but scoring points isn’t a issue for us! It’s the defence, so we need to ask ourselves does Laurie at 6 improve our defence? The answer simply NO!

So no we don’t move Laurie! Leave him where he is excelling, he will only get better with games and years as he grows bigger and stronger.

Remarkable how most of the chat on tigers forums are about how we can improve attack and yet we’ve lost every game this year to defence .
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373869) said:
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373867) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373864) said:
@cktiger said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373820) said:
@demps said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373443) said:
1 Laurie

6 Hynes

If we are lucky enough to get Hynes I'd play him at fullback and put Laurie into the 6.
Reminds me of Jerome Luai, although I don't think Brooks could play a similar role to Cleary.
Hastings would suit him.
Saying that, I'd keep him at the back until we get somebody at least as good to replace him.

It's a Laurie bashing thread and you work a quick right into Brooks.

This isn't a Laurie bashing thread? It's the opposite if anything...

It's a move Laurie to 5/8 thread so those wanting Hynes can work him into their imaginary teams, Laurie is a fine fullback. We're lucky to have him.

I think Hynes is a much more natural 5/8th, if we were to have both on the books by some good fortune.
 
@iofthetigers said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373622) said:
@facepalmer said in [Laurie is a 6](/post/1373535) said:
Wait and see. The dude is clearly a 6. Plays like a 6, looks like a 6. He's not a modern fullback. He is built nothing like an elite fullback. He looks and plays like Jerome Luai or Kodi Nikorima. I am not even really saying to play him at 6, I am just saying 6 is clearly his best position, it's written literally all over the kid. His ceiling is pretty good fullback, but if he gets to play at 6 his ceiling is muuuuch higher. He has physical limitations that will prevent him from becoming a dominant fullback imo.

I think the club sees him as a 6 as well with the players the Tigers have had discussions with

isaako?
who else have they talked to that could play fullback?
 
Back
Top