Di Girolamo puts job on the line to boost Tigers

@wtfl1981 said:
@smeghead said:
I really have no desire to get involved in this merry-go-round again but surely you are not complaining that Ryde Eastwood is sponsoring the team?

What do they (another football club) have to do with WT?

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

They offered to sponsor the team. Should we have knocked back their offer because of the geographical location of the club (the leagues club sponsor the team, not the football club) or because they've previously had an association with one of the joint venture partners? Under that logic, lets knock back Meriton's money, they used to sponsor Balmain.
 
I just don't want to see WT be operated and perceived as an extension of Balmain… If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, its a duck.. Much like balmain tigers blurred into WT

Its sounds trivial to anyone originally from the 'Balmain side of the fence' (who most of who replied to this thread are) but its a valid argument in a JV arrangement.

The new 'pro Balmain' Chairman may have good intensions but he wont get the full respect of the WT fan base if he does not respect the naming and contributing significance of the Wests brand and legacy in WT.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
I am on the Wests Tigers side of the fence.

You said yourself that Ryde Eastwood Leagues club have nothing to do with the JV, now you are claiming a sponsorship arrangement by the same Leagues Club is assisting blurring the lines of distinction. Which one is it exactly?
 
@smeghead said:
I am on the Wests Tigers side of the fence.

You said yourself that Ryde Eastwood Leagues club have nothing to do with the JV, now you are claiming a sponsorship arrangement by the same Leagues Club is assisting blurring the lines of distinction. Which one is it exactly?

I never said that they are blurring the lines with the RE sponsorship there are MANY other factors that blur that line. I am questioning what ryde eastwood has to do with a WT NSW cup team when humphries said that a single nsw cup team would mean more exposure for sponsors (like meriton and hyundai) not being branded with another football club on the chest that has no player or organisational role in WT.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Maybe the sponsorship extension was offered and not accepted?

Maybe the extension will occur at the next negotiation.

They are a sponsor, and the main sponsors logo is emblazoned across the chest.

Find another sponsor willing to front up more $$$ to sponsor the State Cup side and I am happy for it to change.

You will find that the more the NSW Cup gets airtime on Fox the more valuable sponsorship of those jerseys should become.

So in short I agree with you that Wests Tigers should be the way the team is referred to by senior staff and I also agree with the current Chairmans proposal about extension of terms for all the reasons stated.

I find your argument on the State Cup sponsorship nothing but a furphy I am afraid. Sponsors are sponsors and as I said if their cheques are clearing and the brand has no negative press sign them up.

That is everything I have to say about the matter. Good luck though
 
@Benjirific said:
@wtfl1981 said:
The longer term rotating chairman proposal is a reasonable idea, however this quote is oxymoron:

**_"to properly unite the Balmain and Wests factions under the Tigers banner"_**

Should read **Wests Tigers** Banner. Balmain do not need uniting under the Tigers Banner as they have been Tigers since Day one… No wonder the Wests side of the fence gets fed up with the lack of proper brand and club recognition in the JV with public references like this.

**_"the Tigers will field just one NSW Cup side this year"_**

Pretty sure there was only one Tigers team in NSW cup in 2012 and many years before that - **Balmain Ryde-Eastwood Tigers.**

If the founding club identities at non NRL level are to be abolished, at least have the respect to honour both partners of the JV equally rather than have it portrayed publically as an extension of Balmain Tigers.

First of all, both of those quotes are from the copy of the writer, not direct quotes from our chariman. Carefully read every one of this quotes and he specifically says **Wests Tigers** apart from when he refers to Benji and Robbie being 'Tigers for life'. (Hardly a crime).

I agree with LaT -

@LaT said:
Just continue to push that wheelbarrow of division. Because thats the way forward isn't it….

Picking things like this out creates further divide rather than pushing forward. I read this article this morning and felt extremely proud that a senior Wests Tigers official is looking for a way to move the organisation forward beyond a joint venture and is talking about these issues rather than the size of the magpie on the shoulder. This is progress finally, and I hope it isn't stalled by the eventual change of chairman this season. Its refreshing to see we were able to find another quality board member after Trodden's resignation, **and not someone who has looked to tear the joint apart like we've had previously**.

Who are you referring to?
 
@wtfl1981 said:
@smeghead said:
I am on the Wests Tigers side of the fence.

You said yourself that Ryde Eastwood Leagues club have nothing to do with the JV, now you are claiming a sponsorship arrangement by the same Leagues Club is assisting blurring the lines of distinction. Which one is it exactly?

I never said that they are blurring the lines with the RE sponsorship there are MANY other factors that blur that line. I am questioning what ryde eastwood has to do with a WT NSW cup team when Humphreys said that a single nsw cup team would mean more exposure for sponsors (like meriton and hyundai) not being branded with another football club on the chest that has no player or organisational role in WT.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

I repeat the NSW Cup team are sponsored by Ryde Eastwood **LEAGUES** Club, not Ryde-Eastwood Football Club, who don't have any teams. This is quite an important distinction, and I agree with Smeg that it shouldn't matter who is sponsoring the team, you're really trying to create distinction and separation there, which is just sad.
 
@wtfl1981 said:
The longer term rotating chairman proposal is a reasonable idea, however this quote is oxymoron:

**_"to properly unite the Balmain and Wests factions under the Tigers banner"_**

**Should read Wests Tigers Banner. Balmain do not need uniting under the Tigers Banner as they have been Tigers since Day one… No wonder the Wests side of the fence gets fed up with the lack of proper brand and club recognition in the JV with public references like this.**

**_"the Tigers will field just one NSW Cup side this year"_**

Pretty sure there was only one Tigers team in NSW cup in 2012 and many years before that - **Balmain Ryde-Eastwood Tigers.**

If the founding club identities at non NRL level are to be abolished, at least have the respect to honour both partners of the JV equally rather than have it portrayed publically as an extension of Balmain Tigers.

:roll
I think its rather hilarious that you pick one 'mistake' from the whole article which doesn't refer to the club as WESTS TIGERS.
And how many times did the author specify Wests Tigers? Hmm, obviously not good enough! :unamused:
 
@Benjirific said:
@wtfl1981 said:
@smeghead said:
I am on the Wests Tigers side of the fence.

You said yourself that Ryde Eastwood Leagues club have nothing to do with the JV, now you are claiming a sponsorship arrangement by the same Leagues Club is assisting blurring the lines of distinction. Which one is it exactly?

I never said that they are blurring the lines with the RE sponsorship there are MANY other factors that blur that line. I am questioning what ryde eastwood has to do with a WT NSW cup team when Humphreys said that a single nsw cup team would mean more exposure for sponsors (like meriton and hyundai) not being branded with another football club on the chest that has no player or organisational role in WT.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

I repeat the NSW Cup team are sponsored by Ryde Eastwood **LEAGUES** Club, not Ryde-Eastwood Football Club, who don't have any teams. This is quite an important distinction, and I agree with Smeg that it shouldn't matter who is sponsoring the team, you're really trying to create distinction and separation there, which is just sad.

WT nsw cup team jersey has the following:

Ryde Eastwood DRLC (which i imagine stands for District Rugby League Club)

Leagues club or football club - they have nothing to do with the WT business. My point is that It confuses the WT brand when the intension is to make it stronger and less confusing.

Should be meriton, hyundai or isri trucks where the objective was to piggy back of the WT profile and nrl sponsor partners.

Ashfield handed over a $1.2m cheque last year to WT at the end of 2012 (and WT have requested more $$ this month) and Ashfield are also part owners of WT yet will not get any jersey sponsor exposure but RE do???

Whats changed from 2012? A Tigers nsw up team sponsored by Ryde Eastwood based out of concord?

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@armchair expert said:
We are the tigers, we are also wests, we are also the wests tigers. All three names get used and pettyness from fans that we should always be referred to as the wests tigers is ridiculous. **I cant wait till all the old people are gone and we can get on with being one club.** Go tigers…..sorry i cant say that i might offend someone, go wests tigers! I thought this article showed we might be heading in the right direction and uniting as ONE club.

Hey I'm heading towards 60\. I am an old supporter from the dark side (Balmain) but I was a lot younger then, too. I was very happy when Balmain and Western Suburbs formed a joint venture. Believe it or not - I still am.

Now it's my turn.
I wonder what the age group make up of this forum's membership is? I simply ask because there are so many immature posts on here of late. Some make me laugh, others make me cringe but that's what a forum is for I guess - allows people to let off steam. So long as the moderators do their job everything should be fine.

Go Tigers, Wests, Wests Tigers. Whatever.

nuff said
 
@cqtiger said:
@armchair expert said:
We are the tigers, we are also wests, we are also the wests tigers. All three names get used and pettyness from fans that we should always be referred to as the wests tigers is ridiculous. **I cant wait till all the old people are gone and we can get on with being one club.** Go tigers…..sorry i cant say that i might offend someone, go wests tigers! I thought this article showed we might be heading in the right direction and uniting as ONE club.

Hey I'm heading towards 60\. I am an old supporter from the dark side (Balmain) but I was a lot younger then, too. I was very happy when Balmain and Western Suburbs formed a joint venture. Believe it or not - I still am.

Now it's my turn.
I wonder what the age group make up of this forum's membership is? I simply ask because there are so many immature posts on here of late. Some make me laugh, others make me cringe but that's what a forum is for I guess - allows people to let off steam. So long as the moderators do their job everything should be fine.

Go Tigers, Wests, Wests Tigers. Whatever.

nuff said

I am a 32yo dinosaur apparently…

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
God forbid a leagues club in our territory supports our team financially….

1 team based in the same place as our NRL team (hard to make a club if there are 3 teams training at different places) is bad too is it?
 
@wtfl1981 said:
NICK DI GIROLAMO'S first act as Wests Tigers chairman could well do him out of the job.

![](http://images.smh.com.au/2013/02/23/4056610/art-Girolamo-300x0.jpg)

The Australian Water Holdings chairman described the position as a privilege and has only been in the role since mid-December after replacing David Trodden as the Balmain-appointed representative. However, one of his top priorities is to instigate constitutional reform to a joint venture which has been, at times, an uneasy marriage between Balmain and Western Suburbs.

''We need to behave in unison to get the best possible outcome for Wests Tigers,'' Di Girolamo said. ''From a corporate perspective, the JV was executed in 1999\. As night follows day, any agreement which has been around for more than a decade needs review.

''If you look at the annual rotation of the chairman, I don't think any leading corporate organisation would require the person at the helm of the organisation to rotate. I understand from a historical point of view why that might have been necessary in 1999, but it doesn't really make for good corporate governance. What you should be looking at is a three- to four-year tenure as a starting point.

''I am happy if it does me out of a job, as long as it means the right structure. If I'm the deputy chairman for three years and someone from the Wests group is the first chairman for the next three to four years, I'm happy because it's in the best interests of the Wests Tigers. That is of paramount importance.''

In his first interview since stepping into the chair, Di Girolamo revealed his blueprint for the Tigers. One of his long-term objectives is to set up centres of excellence at the club's spiritual homes. ''I'd like to see two academies,'' he said. ''If you look at Leichhardt Oval, you've got a great oval. It needs some maintenance, absolutely. But you could put an academy there, you've got the aquatic centre next door, you've got great grounds all around it. You could capture all of that inner west talent in that academy. And you could replicate it at Campbelltown. By having two centres of excellence, you are really looking after the youth. All under the banner of Wests Tigers.''

Of more immediate concern is re-signing captain Robbie Farah, who is off contract at the end of the season and several clubs, including Parramatta, are circling. It's understood the Tigers have tabled a lucrative deal for him to stay until the end of 2017\. ''Nothing would give me greater satisfaction at this early stage of my tenure than to ensure our captain, Robbie Farah, will be our captain for life,'' he said. ''I want to make sure that our two leaders, Robbie Farah and Benji Marshall, are happy. From a cultural perspective, they are interwoven in the fabric of the club. Unfortunately in this day and age not everyone can be a one-club man. But those two deserve the opportunity to be Tigers for life.''

Di Girolamo has plenty of experience in the corporate scene. He was one of the youngest lawyers to become a partner in a leading Sydney law firm, Colin Biggers & Paisley. For six years he chaired the Italian Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Sydney, has overseen the delivery of $700 million in Sydney's northwest in his roles with Australian Water Holdings and is well connected politically. But the 42-year-old's biggest challenge could be to properly unite the Balmain and Wests factions under the Tigers banner. Despite protests from the Magpies, the Tigers will field just one NSW Cup side this year. ''Whilst I understand the importance of identity, having two State Cup teams has the potential to create a wedge at Wests Tigers level,'' he said. ''Having one brand is the most important thing for me. You don't want to see one of your shareholders getting flogged. We need to be in unison.''

He also weighed into the debate about Leichhardt Oval amid fears the boutique ground can't continue to host NRL games following the release of the state government's stadiums strategy. ''I think there will always be a place for suburban grounds but, having said that, the counter argument is centralisation with the costs involved,'' he said. ''I just don't think we're there yet. At the moment there's a need for suburban grounds like Leichhardt Oval and Campbelltown, where there is a great growth area.''

Australian Water Holdings' links to the Obeid family have been highlighted during the ICAC inquiry but Di Girolamo said he had always acted ethically in all of his business dealings. ''My reputation in the corporate world would speak for itself,'' he said.
\
\
http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/di-girolamo-puts-job-on-the-line-to-boost-tigers-20130223-2ey6t.html

Ok so his first thing in charge is to say(It might cost him is job well der you've only got it for a year anyhow pelican :crazy ) ok since 1999 the JV has alternated between Wests and Balmain for top dog but now im in charge I think its a good idea to have it for 3 or 4 years(HMM Balmain side too for all conspiracy theorists and for all Balmain diehards work on the latest excuses and anti wests Bashing :laughing: )Youre all as guilty as each other.Im a little confused as to the planet some of these posters(or lack of on this topic) are living on.His links to the the dirtiest family of all the obeids is well known I find it ironic that the last piece of this column says My reputation in the corporate world would speak for itself. :smiley: HE SAID :laughing: if it speaks for itself then shut up but I guess its a little hard when your very own company has found itself in,out and back in many days of the ICAC obeid investigation aswell as being in bed with some of the dirtiest leeches of society,THE OBEIDS.
 
@FARANGALANG said:
@wtfl1981 said:
NICK DI GIROLAMO'S first act as Wests Tigers chairman could well do him out of the job.

![](http://images.smh.com.au/2013/02/23/4056610/art-Girolamo-300x0.jpg)

The Australian Water Holdings chairman described the position as a privilege and has only been in the role since mid-December after replacing David Trodden as the Balmain-appointed representative. However, one of his top priorities is to instigate constitutional reform to a joint venture which has been, at times, an uneasy marriage between Balmain and Western Suburbs.

''We need to behave in unison to get the best possible outcome for Wests Tigers,'' Di Girolamo said. ''From a corporate perspective, the JV was executed in 1999\. As night follows day, any agreement which has been around for more than a decade needs review.

''If you look at the annual rotation of the chairman, I don't think any leading corporate organisation would require the person at the helm of the organisation to rotate. I understand from a historical point of view why that might have been necessary in 1999, but it doesn't really make for good corporate governance. What you should be looking at is a three- to four-year tenure as a starting point.

''I am happy if it does me out of a job, as long as it means the right structure. If I'm the deputy chairman for three years and someone from the Wests group is the first chairman for the next three to four years, I'm happy because it's in the best interests of the Wests Tigers. That is of paramount importance.''

In his first interview since stepping into the chair, Di Girolamo revealed his blueprint for the Tigers. One of his long-term objectives is to set up centres of excellence at the club's spiritual homes. ''I'd like to see two academies,'' he said. ''If you look at Leichhardt Oval, you've got a great oval. It needs some maintenance, absolutely. But you could put an academy there, you've got the aquatic centre next door, you've got great grounds all around it. You could capture all of that inner west talent in that academy. And you could replicate it at Campbelltown. By having two centres of excellence, you are really looking after the youth. All under the banner of Wests Tigers.''

Of more immediate concern is re-signing captain Robbie Farah, who is off contract at the end of the season and several clubs, including Parramatta, are circling. It's understood the Tigers have tabled a lucrative deal for him to stay until the end of 2017\. ''Nothing would give me greater satisfaction at this early stage of my tenure than to ensure our captain, Robbie Farah, will be our captain for life,'' he said. ''I want to make sure that our two leaders, Robbie Farah and Benji Marshall, are happy. From a cultural perspective, they are interwoven in the fabric of the club. Unfortunately in this day and age not everyone can be a one-club man. But those two deserve the opportunity to be Tigers for life.''

Di Girolamo has plenty of experience in the corporate scene. He was one of the youngest lawyers to become a partner in a leading Sydney law firm, Colin Biggers & Paisley. For six years he chaired the Italian Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Sydney, has overseen the delivery of $700 million in Sydney's northwest in his roles with Australian Water Holdings and is well connected politically. But the 42-year-old's biggest challenge could be to properly unite the Balmain and Wests factions under the Tigers banner. Despite protests from the Magpies, the Tigers will field just one NSW Cup side this year. ''Whilst I understand the importance of identity, having two State Cup teams has the potential to create a wedge at Wests Tigers level,'' he said. ''Having one brand is the most important thing for me. You don't want to see one of your shareholders getting flogged. We need to be in unison.''

He also weighed into the debate about Leichhardt Oval amid fears the boutique ground can't continue to host NRL games following the release of the state government's stadiums strategy. ''I think there will always be a place for suburban grounds but, having said that, the counter argument is centralisation with the costs involved,'' he said. ''I just don't think we're there yet. At the moment there's a need for suburban grounds like Leichhardt Oval and Campbelltown, where there is a great growth area.''

Australian Water Holdings' links to the Obeid family have been highlighted during the ICAC inquiry but Di Girolamo said he had always acted ethically in all of his business dealings. ''My reputation in the corporate world would speak for itself,'' he said.
\
\
http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/di-girolamo-puts-job-on-the-line-to-boost-tigers-20130223-2ey6t.html

Ok so his first thing in charge is to say(It might cost him is job well der you've only got it for a year anyhow pelican :crazy ) ok since 1999 the JV has alternated between Wests and Balmain for top dog but now im in charge I think its a good idea to have it for 3 or 4 years(HMM Balmain side too for all conspiracy theorists and for all Balmain diehards work on the latest excuses and anti wests Bashing :laughing: )Youre all as guilty as each other.Im a little confused as to the planet some of these posters(or lack of on this topic) are living on.His links to the the dirtiest family of all the obeids is well known I find it ironic that the last piece of this column says My reputation in the corporate world would speak for itself. :smiley: HE SAID :laughing: if it speaks for itself then shut up but I guess its a little hard when your very own company has found itself in,out and back in many days of the ICAC obeid investigation aswell as being in bed with some of the dirtiest leeches of society,THE OBEIDS.

The veil is slipping champ.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@FARANGALANG said:
@wtfl1981 said:
NICK DI GIROLAMO'S first act as Wests Tigers chairman could well do him out of the job.

![](http://images.smh.com.au/2013/02/23/4056610/art-Girolamo-300x0.jpg)

The Australian Water Holdings chairman described the position as a privilege and has only been in the role since mid-December after replacing David Trodden as the Balmain-appointed representative. However, one of his top priorities is to instigate constitutional reform to a joint venture which has been, at times, an uneasy marriage between Balmain and Western Suburbs.

''We need to behave in unison to get the best possible outcome for Wests Tigers,'' Di Girolamo said. ''From a corporate perspective, the JV was executed in 1999\. As night follows day, any agreement which has been around for more than a decade needs review.

''If you look at the annual rotation of the chairman, I don't think any leading corporate organisation would require the person at the helm of the organisation to rotate. I understand from a historical point of view why that might have been necessary in 1999, but it doesn't really make for good corporate governance. What you should be looking at is a three- to four-year tenure as a starting point.

''I am happy if it does me out of a job, as long as it means the right structure. If I'm the deputy chairman for three years and someone from the Wests group is the first chairman for the next three to four years, I'm happy because it's in the best interests of the Wests Tigers. That is of paramount importance.''

In his first interview since stepping into the chair, Di Girolamo revealed his blueprint for the Tigers. One of his long-term objectives is to set up centres of excellence at the club's spiritual homes. ''I'd like to see two academies,'' he said. ''If you look at Leichhardt Oval, you've got a great oval. It needs some maintenance, absolutely. But you could put an academy there, you've got the aquatic centre next door, you've got great grounds all around it. You could capture all of that inner west talent in that academy. And you could replicate it at Campbelltown. By having two centres of excellence, you are really looking after the youth. All under the banner of Wests Tigers.''

Of more immediate concern is re-signing captain Robbie Farah, who is off contract at the end of the season and several clubs, including Parramatta, are circling. It's understood the Tigers have tabled a lucrative deal for him to stay until the end of 2017\. ''Nothing would give me greater satisfaction at this early stage of my tenure than to ensure our captain, Robbie Farah, will be our captain for life,'' he said. ''I want to make sure that our two leaders, Robbie Farah and Benji Marshall, are happy. From a cultural perspective, they are interwoven in the fabric of the club. Unfortunately in this day and age not everyone can be a one-club man. But those two deserve the opportunity to be Tigers for life.''

Di Girolamo has plenty of experience in the corporate scene. He was one of the youngest lawyers to become a partner in a leading Sydney law firm, Colin Biggers & Paisley. For six years he chaired the Italian Chamber of Commerce and Industry in Sydney, has overseen the delivery of $700 million in Sydney's northwest in his roles with Australian Water Holdings and is well connected politically. But the 42-year-old's biggest challenge could be to properly unite the Balmain and Wests factions under the Tigers banner. Despite protests from the Magpies, the Tigers will field just one NSW Cup side this year. ''Whilst I understand the importance of identity, having two State Cup teams has the potential to create a wedge at Wests Tigers level,'' he said. ''Having one brand is the most important thing for me. You don't want to see one of your shareholders getting flogged. We need to be in unison.''

He also weighed into the debate about Leichhardt Oval amid fears the boutique ground can't continue to host NRL games following the release of the state government's stadiums strategy. ''I think there will always be a place for suburban grounds but, having said that, the counter argument is centralisation with the costs involved,'' he said. ''I just don't think we're there yet. At the moment there's a need for suburban grounds like Leichhardt Oval and Campbelltown, where there is a great growth area.''

Australian Water Holdings' links to the Obeid family have been highlighted during the ICAC inquiry but Di Girolamo said he had always acted ethically in all of his business dealings. ''My reputation in the corporate world would speak for itself,'' he said.
\
\
http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/di-girolamo-puts-job-on-the-line-to-boost-tigers-20130223-2ey6t.html

Ok so his first thing in charge is to say(It might cost him is job well der you've only got it for a year anyhow pelican :crazy ) ok since 1999 the JV has alternated between Wests and Balmain for top dog but now im in charge I think its a good idea to have it for 3 or 4 years(HMM Balmain side too for all conspiracy theorists and for all Balmain diehards work on the latest excuses and anti wests Bashing :laughing: )Youre all as guilty as each other.Im a little confused as to the planet some of these posters(or lack of on this topic) are living on.His links to the the dirtiest family of all the obeids is well known I find it ironic that the last piece of this column says My reputation in the corporate world would speak for itself. :smiley: HE SAID :laughing: if it speaks for itself then shut up but I guess its a little hard when your very own company has found itself in,out and back in many days of the ICAC obeid investigation aswell as being in bed with some of the dirtiest leeches of society,THE OBEIDS.

The veil is slipping champ.

The veil as in burkha .HUH. :crazy
 
@wtfl1981 said:
@cqtiger said:
@armchair expert said:
We are the tigers, we are also wests, we are also the wests tigers. All three names get used and pettyness from fans that we should always be referred to as the wests tigers is ridiculous. **I cant wait till all the old people are gone and we can get on with being one club.** Go tigers…..sorry i cant say that i might offend someone, go wests tigers! I thought this article showed we might be heading in the right direction and uniting as ONE club.

Hey I'm heading towards 60\. I am an old supporter from the dark side (Balmain) but I was a lot younger then, too. I was very happy when Balmain and Western Suburbs formed a joint venture. Believe it or not - I still am.

Now it's my turn.
I wonder what the age group make up of this forum's membership is? I simply ask because there are so many immature posts on here of late. Some make me laugh, others make me cringe but that's what a forum is for I guess - allows people to let off steam. So long as the moderators do their job everything should be fine.

Go Tigers, Wests, Wests Tigers. Whatever.

nuff said

I am a 32yo dinosaur apparently…

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

I wasn't actually referring to age but to those with old ties to pre JV. I worded it poorly which is a weakness of mine and why i dont often use the internet to voice my opinion
I was 16 when th JV was formed and it reignited a falling passion in rugby league for me, which is i guess why i dont have strong feelings towards anything but wests tigers. In the past 12 years i have kept an eye on the results of both NSW cup teams but there is no real passion for either team anymore. I just dont want infighting to bring down the wests tigers brand, i understand the tradition that people dont want to see die but i see wests tigers as the next chapter of those traditional teams. Sorry i struggle to get my point accross in text form.
 
Let me tell my history to understand what has driven my opinion on the matters this post has DEGENERATED into.
I started following the Wests Magpies, because my Dad became a fan in 1948\. We travelled to all of their games by public transport, because my Mum and Dad could not afford a car. When I met my wife, her family were Magpie mad, because her uncle and cousin both played first grade for Wests. I was a member of the Wests Leagues Club, where we spent many hours over many years. We continued to go to almost all of the Magpies games, until our sons were born, when we followed them on TV, if we did not go to the game. When our sons were old enough, we took up season tickets and started to go to games regularly again. Old age has cut back the number of live games we see now, but we still "follow" Wests.
I read the article on Mr. Di Girolamo in the paper yesterday with great interest. Here at last there might be a chairman, who seems to have a vision outside the current inward-looking vision of the Wests Tigers and the NRL. His vision for the future for the Tigers expressed in the article suggests he will try to advance the Club, which is necessary in the face of attack from other sports. With the rise of the Western Wanderers, the opposition will only increase into the future.
As an old Magpie, look at my user-name, I do not mind being known as a "Tigers" supporter. I wish the time comes in the near future, where there is no more "us" versus "them" on this forum.
 
Okay so let's review the direct quotes from Di Girolamo

"We need to behave in unison to get the best possible outcome for **Wests Tigers,**''
"I'm happy because it's in the best interests of the **Wests Tigers**"
"By having two centres of excellence, you are really looking after the youth. All under the banner of **Wests Tigers**.''
"But those two deserve the opportunity to be **Tigers** for life.''
"Whilst I understand the importance of identity, having two State Cup teams has the potential to create a wedge at **Wests Tigers** level"

So that's 4 references to Wests Tigers and one to Tigers… Some of you guys could whinge for Australia...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top