Try quoting contracts when they havent been signed for one. Theres a difference between speculating and then having inside information then tabling it
\
\
@fibrodreaming said:@tigers05 said:@Black'n'White said:@tigers05 said:No tantrum…....the moronic move is your comments...........childish behaviour is an insider sharing information which is deemed sensitive.....
Someone cannot be outed if they doing anything wrong?? Get it!!!
But you would prefer to get inside information regardless of the cost........whether its right or wrong....
ah….. so you throwing your toys out of the cot earlier when you were posting a persons name?
no. it wasnt until someone pointed out you put someones real name out on a forum, then a moderator got rid of it that you threw your fit.
Not at all I can PM you but TT disabled his. Does it really matter if I say hi BOB, PETER, PAUL or even MARY…....
I can even say to you is that you JOE.............would it be deleted the answer would be NO.....
But someone is doing something wrong by sharing sensitive information and thats ok.
My intention was to get them to stop its not needed.....they compromising there position and if I was able to PM them I would have said so in a private message.
Its ok you fire off what you want you cannot defend what is wrong.....and in this instance TT is out of order regardless how honorable he may think he is
What did TT reveal that was so sensitive tigers05? It was interesting background, no more.
For the record, I think it's wrong to speculate on-line about the identity of the author.