goldcoast_tiger
New member
@Nelson said:@goldcoast tiger said:@Geo. said:@goldcoast tiger said:And what if there,s things that we don't know about here. (I know that that's very unlikely), but is a teenie chance, despite our zealous search for the truth .
If by a chance that there is , and the club has things to answer for in their dealings with Farah.
Do you still think that it's end of story for the clubs perspective?
Or is Farah not entitled to take them to court if he feels the need to
Without any of us geniuses deciding who is right and who is wrong& who is right.
Last I heard, this was still a country where we had the right to go to court to fight something if we feel it was wrong.
So if one of us completely uninformed bystanders has proof that the club hasn't done anything that it can be sued for, please let us know.
Maybe some of the experts on everything can apply to be the judge
A lot of if's and but's in this post…
It's pretty simple really
It's mainly a question, if anyone one has proof that the club hasn't done anything that it can be sued for( in this whole thing) please let us know
Just asking for proof, something that is very light on most of the time
This is a form of fallacious argument known as an argument from silence. You are trying to draw a conclusion from the absence of evidence rather than the existence of evidence. It doesn't actually make either position any more valid than the other.
The point is that no one can say that the club has not done something that Farah can sue it for. Yet he's getting plenty of stick for doing that ( if it's even true that that is what he's doing)
Another case of baking someone , but not having a clue what it's about . Very common here