Blaze
Well-known member
@goldcoast tiger said:@Blaze said:@Eddie said:@Blaze said:But why are they b/s reasons? He isn't playing the hooker role like the coach wants him to play. And by all reports isn't willing to. Which is going against what the coach wants… If he had done so he would still be in the team.
So scoring 30 plus points, and servicing the halves with early ball in the last 2 game were against the game plan ?
No, it was fine, but after watching how much more involved the halves were last game, there was a clear difference. Obviously things are going to get better with a proper hooker instead of dean and co. But surely you could see the difference in the halves being left with no option but to take control? Which is what this move is about… Sure you can go down the easy path and believe it's personal, but I'm not so sure the club would go through this backlash if it was the reason.
You don't think the Quality of the opposition had a slight bit to do with it . It was as bad as ours if ET is not playing
You can only play what's in front of you. I don't care who we are playing, all it means was our forwards had an easier job getting a roll on and creating space for our halves… The aim was achieved that's all.