Hater's gonna hate, hate, hate

[Kavi]

shake it off, shake it off, shake it off

 

[innsaneink]

Last year his management gave the club and Taylor a spray..saying they gave Farah no real chance to find a new club because most clubs had already filled their caps for 2016\. They have gone very quite this year and have had a lot of time to work with.

Revenge is a very destructive emotion

I could be wrong here coach but i thought his management asked for a release in the pre season?

One which was not granted by the Tigers.

Mate I could be wrong, but I thought he asked for a release to go to the chooks, with the chooks only willing to pick up 100g of his contract value hence the refusal by the club

Yeah that was reported but then there was also a suggestion that Jake Friend had them retract the offer anyway. Who knows…

The NRL don't allow such scenarios where a player is picked up for such a minimal fee

 

[tigerman80]

I could be wrong here coach but i thought his management asked for a release in the pre season?

One which was not granted by the Tigers.

Mate I could be wrong, but I thought he asked for a release to go to the chooks, with the chooks only willing to pick up 100g of his contract value hence the refusal by the club

Yeah that was reported but then there was also a suggestion that Jake Friend had them retract the offer anyway. Who knows…

The NRL don't allow such scenarios where a player is picked up for such a minimal fee

As long as Farah is getting his $900k it doesnt matter who is paying it. So how did the NRL allow us to sign Ballin for peanuts according to some here. So if a club pays $200k and we are left with $700k then its up to the Wests tigers to accept and wouldnt have anything to do with the NRL.

 

[Masterton]

Mate I could be wrong, but I thought he asked for a release to go to the chooks, with the chooks only willing to pick up 100g of his contract value hence the refusal by the club

Yeah that was reported but then there was also a suggestion that Jake Friend had them retract the offer anyway. Who knows…

The NRL don't allow such scenarios where a player is picked up for such a minimal fee

As long as Farah is getting his $900k it doesnt matter who is paying it. So how did the NRL allow us to sign Ballin for peanuts according to some here. So if a club pays $200k and we are left with $700k then its up to the Wests tigers to accept and wouldnt have anything to do with the NRL.

I'm not sure how it works. There was talk when Farah was linked to the Roosters at a bargain price, that it would not be allowed.

from channel nine: "The NRL is unlikely to allow the Roosters to register Farah for a bargain price under the salary cap even if the Tigers pay out a large portion of his contract."

 

[Love_the_WestsTigers]

Well this is what James Hooper thinks
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/the-club-that-could-save-robbie-farahs-nrl-career–media-watch/news-story/00e0c0e9872015a093aa23d6380f903d

“I think he’s going to most likely end up at St George Illawarra.

“As it stands they’re the only club in the NRL that have expressed any sort of interest in having Robbie next year.

“The Wests Tigers will need to chip in a lot of money to make this happen — perhaps as much as $800,000 of Robbie’s $950,000 contract — the Dragons would then make up the rest and there is some pressure at this point for Robbie to also to be given a deal for 2018.

In the mean Time this is what Brett Kimmorley’s advice to Robbie is
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/brett-kimmorleys-advice-to-wests-tigers-veteran-robbie-farah--highs-lows-and-big-blows/news-story/4cdeaaa8f1e205a5338fede155ce5ee1

IT’S time for Robbie Farah to cut the cord and leave the Wests Tigers.

Or to put it bluntly — pay out his salary and show him the door.

 

[innsaneink]

Mate I could be wrong, but I thought he asked for a release to go to the chooks, with the chooks only willing to pick up 100g of his contract value hence the refusal by the club

Yeah that was reported but then there was also a suggestion that Jake Friend had them retract the offer anyway. Who knows…

The NRL don't allow such scenarios where a player is picked up for such a minimal fee

As long as Farah is getting his $900k it doesnt matter who is paying it. So how did the NRL allow us to sign Ballin for peanuts according to some here. So if a club pays $200k and we are left with $700k then its up to the Wests tigers to accept and wouldnt have anything to do with the NRL.

Its not that simple. I heard it on a radio interview and it made sense, unfortunatley cant find anything online in text about it Id love to know more clearly
There is a base nominal fee, a percentage that must be paid. You cant have the new club paying only a fraction like 10%.

I take no notice of forum contract figures

 

[Longhorn]

The contracts in the nrl need to be regulated by a third party, they can enforce them, witness them, and keep clubs from bullying tactics further it will be managed in a way that they'll have no excuse to break the salary cap. Similar to the nsw gov trustee and guardian. If any disputes are put forward they can be heard at a tribunal where sufficient evidence can be presented. Carying out in house reviews can be a thing of the past because it's obvious clubs don't and can't be trusted to operate with integrity. And bye the way before i forget the iq of the tigers board can't be any higher than the coach's petty .01

 

[goldcoast_tiger]

The contracts in the nrl need to be regulated by a third party, they can enforce them, witness them, and keep clubs from bullying tactics further it will be managed in a way that they'll have no excuse to break the salary cap. Similar to the nsw gov trustee and guardian. If any disputes are put forward it can be heard at a tribunal where sufficient evidence can be presented. Carying out in house reviews can be a thing of the past because it's obvious clubs don't and can't be trusted to operate with integrity. And bye the way before i forget the iq of the tigers board can't be any higher than the coach's petty .01

Well overdue

 

[goldcoast_tiger]

Yeah that was reported but then there was also a suggestion that Jake Friend had them retract the offer anyway. Who knows…

The NRL don't allow such scenarios where a player is picked up for such a minimal fee

As long as Farah is getting his $900k it doesnt matter who is paying it. So how did the NRL allow us to sign Ballin for peanuts according to some here. So if a club pays $200k and we are left with $700k then its up to the Wests tigers to accept and wouldnt have anything to do with the NRL.

Its not that simple. I heard it on a radio interview and it made sense, unfortunatley cant find anything online in text about it Id love to know more clearly
There is a base nominal fee, a percentage that must be paid. You cant have the new club paying only a fraction like 10%.

I take no notice of forum contract figures

Inks right , that's why people saying that clubs could be picking him up for a pittance , are way off.

 

[Nelson]

The contracts in the nrl need to be regulated by a third party, they can enforce them, witness them, and keep clubs from bullying tactics further it will be managed in a way that they'll have no excuse to break the salary cap. Similar to the nsw gov trustee and guardian. If any disputes are put forward they can be heard at a tribunal where sufficient evidence can be presented. Carying out in house reviews can be a thing of the past because it's obvious clubs don't and can't be trusted to operate with integrity. And bye the way before i forget the iq of the tigers board can't be any higher than the coach's petty .01

Yeah I'm sure that would magically stop payments outside the cap. Contracts already have to be registered with the NRL and enforcement can be sought through the courts.

What bullying tactics anyway? You couldn't have an external body telling a club how to pick their first grade team.

 

[Longhorn]

The contracts in the nrl need to be regulated by a third party, they can enforce them, witness them, and keep clubs from bullying tactics further it will be managed in a way that they'll have no excuse to break the salary cap. Similar to the nsw gov trustee and guardian. If any disputes are put forward they can be heard at a tribunal where sufficient evidence can be presented. Carying out in house reviews can be a thing of the past because it's obvious clubs don't and can't be trusted to operate with integrity. And bye the way before i forget the iq of the tigers board can't be any higher than the coach's petty .01

Yeah I'm sure that would magically stop payments outside the cap. Contracts already have to be registered with the NRL and enforcement can be sought through the courts.

What bullying tactics anyway? You couldn't have an external body telling a club how to pick their first grade team.

They can pick who they like, play the the full back at hooker i don't care, just becsuse you want someone to walk and not cough up what his owed doesn't mean they have the right to gag him and stop him from explaining what he thinks is the case. If they want to dump a first grade player to reserves then he has the right to share his opinion with the fans. None of these internal enquiries, a full explanation straight from the horses mouth if your adamant you shouldn't be afraid to explain it fair and square. Last i checked nrl players don't live in North Korea.

 

[sideline_eye]

Ahhhhh my memories of Jason taylor at the berri st tavern in North sydney not so long ago the joint the bears used to frequant after a game. He was a social dud back then and is still not comfortable dealing with people today. That sorry assed look on his face hasn't changed and when he does try and smile it hurts his head. Always had the look of a kid who dropped his candy in the s***. Would loved to of been able to see the look after the faaaaaaaalogo medication. Now the rotten luck has its head show up at the Tigers how unfortunate. Feel free to correct my grammar you lovers of the language that has borrowed every word from other languages.

Your grammar and spelling are so poor that they are beyond correction which is not all that surprising coming from someone who appreciates a good king hit from a well known thug. Advocating violence on this forum should not be allowed.

 

[Nelson]

They can pick who they like, play the the full back at hooker i don't care, just becsuse you want someone to walk and not cough up what his owed doesn't mean they have the right to gag him and stop him from explaining what he thinks is the case. If they want to dump a first grade player to reserves then he has the right to share his opinion with the fans. None of these internal enquiries, a full explanation straight from the horses mouth if your adamant you shouldn't be afraid to explain it fair and square. Last i checked nrl players don't live in North Korea.

Yes, they do have the right to do that. He has the right to be paid. They have the right to enforce the conditions of his employment, which includes the terms on which he represents the club and its officials to the public via the media.

Comparing it to living in North Korea is a crap analogy. Government censorship is not the same as an employer censoring the conduct of its employee that has a direct bearing on the employer. The consideration lies in the cash being paid. Don't like it, don't take the money. It's not like its different to other workplaces in that regard.

 

[Longhorn]

They can pick who they like, play the the full back at hooker i don't care, just becsuse you want someone to walk and not cough up what his owed doesn't mean they have the right to gag him and stop him from explaining what he thinks is the case. If they want to dump a first grade player to reserves then he has the right to share his opinion with the fans. None of these internal enquiries, a full explanation straight from the horses mouth if your adamant you shouldn't be afraid to explain it fair and square. Last i checked nrl players don't live in North Korea.

Yes, they do have the right to do that. He has the right to be paid. They have the right to enforce the conditions of his employment, which includes the terms on which he represents the club and its officials to the public via the media.

Comparing it to living in North Korea is a crap analogy. Government censorship is not the same as an employer censoring the conduct of its employee that has a direct bearing on the employer. The consideration lies in the cash being paid. Don't like it, don't take the money. It's not like its different to other workplaces in that regard.

Crap analogy? Maybe, but dropping a SOO player to reserve grade? Now that's crap. That like giving laurie the finger. Stupid move by a stupid coach. Employees have rights i don't care who they work for.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

They can pick who they like, play the the full back at hooker i don't care, just becsuse you want someone to walk and not cough up what his owed doesn't mean they have the right to gag him and stop him from explaining what he thinks is the case. If they want to dump a first grade player to reserves then he has the right to share his opinion with the fans. None of these internal enquiries, a full explanation straight from the horses mouth if your adamant you shouldn't be afraid to explain it fair and square. Last i checked nrl players don't live in North Korea.

Yes, they do have the right to do that. He has the right to be paid. They have the right to enforce the conditions of his employment, which includes the terms on which he represents the club and its officials to the public via the media.

Comparing it to living in North Korea is a crap analogy. Government censorship is not the same as an employer censoring the conduct of its employee that has a direct bearing on the employer. The consideration lies in the cash being paid. Don't like it, don't take the money. It's not like its different to other workplaces in that regard.

Crap analogy? Maybe, but dropping a SOO player to reserve grade? Now that's crap. That like giving laurie the finger. Stupid move by a stupid coach. Employees have rights i don't care who they work for.

And what right does any player have to play fg?

 

[happy_tiger]

Ahhhhh my memories of Jason taylor at the berri st tavern in North sydney not so long ago the joint the bears used to frequant after a game. He was a social dud back then and is still not comfortable dealing with people today. That sorry assed look on his face hasn't changed and when he does try and smile it hurts his head. Always had the look of a kid who dropped his candy in the s***. Would loved to of been able to see the look after the faaaaaaaalogo medication. Now the rotten luck has its head show up at the Tigers how unfortunate. Feel free to correct my grammar you lovers of the language that has borrowed every word from other languages.

Can someone just ban this jerk who seems to have signed up to spout hateful crap and stir people?

At least smart enough to find the correct thread…to spew hate

Look everyone I'm entitled to an opinion no matter how dumb stupid or plain idiotic it is....

Yes Geo we let you have your say as well …............

 

[dimitri]

..and putting Rankin at Dummy Half to give Halatau a rest is Taylor's answer of the future?

God help us.

All the while there is a SOO dummy half siting in reserve grade because at times he likes to stand up and engage the markers.

Taylor stuffed up last year by saying "get lost Farah you are not wanted" and signing Ballin who was on one leg and about to retire.

This thing stinks.

 

[sideline_eye]

Moving Rankin to dummy half was a forced move by only having 15 men but I thought that it worked quite well. We were defending a lead, so DH in attack and back to the wing in defence helped us get the win. I don't think it will happen against Parramatta but it's always an option now.

 

[Club_Sandwich]

Well that's a relief. I thought this was going to be another bloody Robbie Farah thread.

Oh. Dammit.

 

[stevetiger]

Moving Rankin to dummy half was a forced move by only having 15 men but I thought that it worked quite well. We were defending a lead, so DH in attack and back to the wing in defence helped us get the win. I don't think it will happen against Parramatta but it's always an option now.

Another comment from a JT crony that proves that you guys have no idea at all. Lovett bombed a try and got brushed easily for them to score a try. That's because he was in the centres and Rankin was at 9.

If that worked well then god help us.