weststigers
Well-known member
I don't follow...you mean it's Balmains fault?See?
Now you're getting to the crux of the story.
What gave HBG control?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't follow...you mean it's Balmains fault?See?
Now you're getting to the crux of the story.
What gave HBG control?
I have my theories is all.You know that too
That's the angle he has been working for the last 30 minutesI don't follow...you mean it's Balmains fault?
I mean that HBG assumed control when one side of a co-existence stopped supporting the venture.I don't follow...you mean it's Balmains fault?
Why acting so ill informed?I have my theories is all.
I'm no better than a fat, lazy (& apparently extremely unfunny) Fox Mulder clone that doubles as a HBG stooge on weekends.
Except I'm not blaming anyone.That's the angle he has been working for the last 30 minutes
Mate- I'm just sitting here in my undies, reading a message board with my theories.Why acting so ill informed?
Our entire ownership group has let this club and its fans down. We need betterExcept I'm not blaming anyone.
If you think I'm about to disagree, you'll be disappointed.Our entire ownership group has let this club and its fans down. We need better
If only I was a bit less worked up I might have cottoned on. Or he could have just said it.That's the angle he has been working for the last 30 minutes
These fools were a problem when it was 50/50 too. Either way, why should the fans have to put up with these heroin junkies (alledgedly) blowing up the club every season or two?I mean that HBG assumed control when one side of a co-existence stopped supporting the venture.
It's not about 'fault'
How do you wrestle control of majority share holders?
Why just the new CEO...Mate- I'm just sitting here in my undies, reading a message board with my theories.
If I knew much of anything, I'd probably offer suggestions.
I just hope the new CEO is good.
If only I was a bit less worked up I might have cottoned on. Or he could have just said it.If only I was a bit less worked up I might have cottoned on. Or he could have just said it.
These fools were a problem when it was 50/50 too. Either way, why should the fans have to put up with these heroin junkies (alledgedly) blowing up the club every season or two?
It's outrageous...this is about how they manage the club and 20 people who don't even own the club...they just have control of the club, make decisions for a huge supporter base - it would be ok if they made good decisions, but sadly they don't.
I do it for the likes ChadIf only I was a bit less worked up I might have cottoned on. Or he could have just said it.
Dude- why would you lie to me? You said you were chilled out.
True! I hope the new board members are awesome too.Why just the new CEO...
There will be more new CEOs after him tooWhy just the new CEO...
Well, I hope he has clauses like Richo did thenThere will be more new CEOs after him too
He will sign on with a rigged board, so he won't need themWell, I hope he has clauses like Richo did then
Sounds like a great job. Are they taking applications?He will sign on with a rigged board, so he won't need them
I think you need to do a bit more research, but I know you think you know...that's what I know"These fools were a problem when it was 50/50 too. Either way, why should the fans have to put up with these heroin junkies (alledgedly) blowing up the club every season or two?"
Other than the rather scandalous accusation, the fact that they were a problem at 50/50 was mitigated by the fact they were not majority board members.
The need for 'independent board members' hired by...the majority share holders...wasn't required.