HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

That's the angle he has been working for the last 30 minutes
If only I was a bit less worked up I might have cottoned on. Or he could have just said it.
I mean that HBG assumed control when one side of a co-existence stopped supporting the venture.

It's not about 'fault'

How do you wrestle control of majority share holders?
These fools were a problem when it was 50/50 too. Either way, why should the fans have to put up with these heroin junkies (alledgedly) blowing up the club every season or two?

It's outrageous...this is about how they manage the club and 20 people who don't even own the club...they just have control of the club, make decisions for a huge supporter base - it would be ok if they made good decisions, but sadly they don't.
 
If only I was a bit less worked up I might have cottoned on. Or he could have just said it.

These fools were a problem when it was 50/50 too. Either way, why should the fans have to put up with these heroin junkies (alledgedly) blowing up the club every season or two?

It's outrageous...this is about how they manage the club and 20 people who don't even own the club...they just have control of the club, make decisions for a huge supporter base - it would be ok if they made good decisions, but sadly they don't.
If only I was a bit less worked up I might have cottoned on. Or he could have just said it.

Dude- why would you lie to me? You said you were chilled out.
 
"These fools were a problem when it was 50/50 too. Either way, why should the fans have to put up with these heroin junkies (alledgedly) blowing up the club every season or two?"

Other than the rather scandalous accusation, the fact that they were a problem at 50/50 was mitigated by the fact they were not majority board members.

The need for 'independent board members' hired by...the majority share holders...wasn't required.
 
"These fools were a problem when it was 50/50 too. Either way, why should the fans have to put up with these heroin junkies (alledgedly) blowing up the club every season or two?"

Other than the rather scandalous accusation, the fact that they were a problem at 50/50 was mitigated by the fact they were not majority board members.

The need for 'independent board members' hired by...the majority share holders...wasn't required.
I think you need to do a bit more research, but I know you think you know...that's what I know
 

Members online

Back
Top