Jedi_Tiger
Well-known member
as a balmain rlfc member in 2019 membership was transferred to WADo I recall correctly that when the petition first came out, a couple of years ago, that new memberships were blocked at WA?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
as a balmain rlfc member in 2019 membership was transferred to WADo I recall correctly that when the petition first came out, a couple of years ago, that new memberships were blocked at WA?
My agenda isn't threatened at all.
I'm merely asking for transparency and clarity. What exactly is it you are trying to hide?
(Aside from advertising why Barnier resigned from Opal)
And yet I was blocked, and for having what, a difference of opinion? What else do you call that? I'm all earslol define 'fully supported' - you won't be able to because it is a completely subjective idea.
Childish is your frequent use of extreme language to describe opinions you disagree with - references to North Korea, 'stench', 'dictatorship', 'blocked'.
The timing of my entering this conversation was seeing the post shared from Kelly Hollis yesterday. When I went to search for "her" group, I found not only was I no longer a group member, but also have been blocked from seeing the group.*face palm* You can pose as if you are innocent but the timing of your choice to enter this thread suggests otherwise.
A difference of opinion is definitively different from not being 'fully supportive', which is what you asserted. That's what I would call it.And yet I was blocked, and for having what, a difference of opinion? What else do you call that? I'm all ears
We all have differences of opinion. But one doesn't remove them from a group just for that.A difference of opinion is definitively different from not being 'fully supportive', which is what you asserted. That's what I would call it.
Like I said, like clockwork. Whether it is here or in a public or private group, the HBG supporters turn up when the established order is threatened.The timing of my entering this conversation was seeing the post shared from Kelly Hollis yesterday. When I went to search for "her" group, I found not only was I no longer a group member, but also have been blocked from seeing the group.
So, given this isn't being discussed on other FB groups (and it shouldn't be, it's not a Wests Tigers story), I thought I'd jump onto the forum to read all about it... And here we are.
The things Magpies were writing about her and others were disgusting and abusive. She has every right to choose who’s in her groupWe all have differences of opinion. But one doesn't remove them from a group just for that.
Why though?That's why i support a professional recruitment process for the appointment of the Wests Tigers board members.
You know like we had for the directors HBG canned.
Ironic that you are upset about being excluded from a group and would like some transperancy. Sounds like WT fans asking for an explanation about the HBG board.We all have differences of opinion. But one doesn't remove them from a group just for that.
Because they aren’t capable of running the football club. It’s as simple as that.Why though?
Wests Ashfield own 90% of the football club. Why should they be forced into such a recruitment process? They literally own the football club.
Yes, would be great if the Leagues Club decided to spend money on professional recruitment companies to bring new board members in. But every one of those executive recruitment processes costs money. And that's money taken out of the football club.
Is that what you are asking for?
Its interesting you use the bulldogs as an example..Why does it need to be run "like other clubs"??
Balmain Leagues Club had the same setup as "other clubs". We know what happened there.
Parramatta has that same setup. We know the history of board infighting there.
Look at the Bulldogs and their recent boardroom fighting.
This ain't no vision of Paradise
Life under albanese and the woke muppets 😅And yet I was blocked, and for having what, a difference of opinion? What else do you call that? I'm all ears
The Magpies pages do exactly that, I never got to a difference of opinion, I was removed without even posting about my issues with HBG.We all have differences of opinion. But one doesn't remove them from a group just for that.
Because they don't have the required skill set to run a modern day professional sporting organisation.Why though?
Wests Ashfield own 90% of the football club. Why should they be forced into such a recruitment process? They literally own the football club.
Yes, would be great if the Leagues Club decided to spend money on professional recruitment companies to bring new board members in. But every one of those executive recruitment processes costs money. And that's money taken out of the football club.
Is that what you are asking for?
Because you’re clearly agenda driven . And it’s not wests tigers —— everything else .The timing of my entering this conversation was seeing the post shared from Kelly Hollis yesterday. When I went to search for "her" group, I found not only was I no longer a group member, but also have been blocked from seeing the group.
So, given this isn't being discussed on other FB groups (and it shouldn't be, it's not a Wests Tigers story), I thought I'd jump onto the forum to read all about it... And here we are.
And Gary Barnier does? Opal Care Homes anyone? He's the last person I would be inviting onto a boardBecause they don't have the required skill set to run a modern day professional sporting organisation.
They are dysfunctional in the extreme and are a handbrake to the the success of the club.
My agenda isn't threatened at all.
I'm merely asking for transparency and clarity. What exactly is it you are trying to hide?
(Aside from advertising why Barnier resigned from Opal)
Indeed. Apparently having a difference of opinion now is somehow offensiveLife under albanese and the woke muppets 😅
We used a professional recruitment process, we actually used the same company to do it twice due to HBG incompetence.Why though?
Wests Ashfield own 90% of the football club. Why should they be forced into such a recruitment process? They literally own the football club.
Yes, would be great if the Leagues Club decided to spend money on professional recruitment companies to bring new board members in. But every one of those executive recruitment processes costs money. And that's money taken out of the football club.
Is that what you are asking for?