HBG, Independent Directors Sacked

[Merlot]

To make them cry

You (and your mates) actually throw a question at them that snookers them.
But their modus operandi is to spread dissent ,and they just shoot from the hip stating this n that, demanding proof ,but rarely reply to the most basic of show proof the other way ,
And when they get boxed in they just agree ,to hose things down,seen more of that lately
Each 2 their own,you doing ok ?hope so

 

[crazycat]

I call you out because your research is zero and can be crushed by easily researching facts.

As I said on other posts...
THIS IS NOT HOW WE SORT OUT OUR DISAGREEMENTS.

"The Chad" and "weststigers" To Thunderdome!

"two men enter, one man leaves! Two men Enter, one man leaves!"

Will also accept a good "biff", a cochroach race and who can hit the highest in the stall!
This is a footy forum, please be appropiate.

 

[Rock Hopper Steve]

You (and your mates) actually throw a question at them that snookers them.
But their modus operandi is to spread dissent ,and they just shoot from the hip stating this n that, demanding proof ,but rarely reply to the most basic of show proof the other way ,
And when they get boxed in they just agree ,to hose things down,seen more of that lately
Each 2 their own,you doing ok ?hope so

Well look at you, being a clever dick lol.

 

[weststigers]

As I said on other posts...
THIS IS NOT HOW WE SORT OUT OUR DISAGREEMENTS.

"The Chad" and "weststigers" To Thunderdome!

"two men enter, one man leaves! Two men Enter, one man leaves!"

Will also accept a good "biff", a cochroach race and who can hit the highest in the stall!
This is a footy forum, please be appropiate.

I don't fight clowns

 

[weststigers]

You (and your mates) actually throw a question at them that snookers them.
But their modus operandi is to spread dissent ,and they just shoot from the hip stating this n that, demanding proof ,but rarely reply to the most basic of show proof the other way ,
And when they get boxed in they just agree ,to hose things down,seen more of that lately
Each 2 their own,you doing ok ?hope so

You nailed it.

As for me...always good. I hope you are too.

 

[Merlot]

Well look at you, being a clever dick lol.

who invited you lol

 

[The Chad]

This whole time your stance has been to argue that HBG statements and actions should be taken on face value until proved otherwise. However, by the above post, you dont hold the same requirements for the rest of the club. Anything said by others outside HBG its fair to question the validity. You just exposed your clear bias here. Its either bias or trolling, which is also evident by your other post with the picture of a person stirring the pot. My assumption is that its both. Your a HBG poster boy and a troll

Or in reverse- it's fair to question every statement by HBG but not fair to question others?

You throw it at me like I'm the one doing this when a large percentage of the people on here happily question the validity of any statement by HBG.

Just making a comparison.

 

[king_sirro]

Or in reverse- it's fair to question every statement by HBG but not fair to question others?

You throw it at me like I'm the one doing this when a large percentage of the people on here happily question the validity of any statement by HBG.

Just making a comparison.

And why do you think the majority are sceptical of HBG? I mean the evidence of failure while they have been in charge of the club is there for all to see. The argument they have been successful, which is clearly the side you sit on even though you will downplay that, is non existent. Thats why you won't openly commit to that, you play it off like your just trying to be open minded and see the other side, all the while not seeing the obvious (well id say you do see the obvious, but........)
..

 

[The Chad]

And why do you think the majority are sceptical of HBG? I mean the evidence of failure while they have been in charge of the club is there for all to see. The argument they have been successful, which is clearly the side you sit on even though you will downplay that, is non existent. Thats why you won't openly commit to that, you play it off like your just trying to be open minded and see the other side, all the while not seeing the obvious (well id say you do see the obvious, but........)
..

You're right- I'll downplay it because that isn't what I've said.

If we are simply only talking about results on the field- there is no argument. But I've not argued that once.

I've also never said HBG don't make mistakes. Because it seems pretty obvious they have.

What is it you want me to commit to?

I don't think they are as bad as people want to make them out to be. I think they are a necessary evil until there is a better option. In fact I think they should be encouraged to continue, instead of removed. But in a format where they are not 90% owners of the club.

I think people are happy to overlook the only quotable remarks around the recent board moves because 'we don't trust them' instead of trying to dig deeper into the why of it.

I think people have convinced themselves of a 'truth' regarding the meeting between PVL & HBG because it fits what they want to believe.

When I've said "We don't know" what I really mean is- we don't know. But, there are a few louder voices who believe they do. Based off assumptions.

It's ok to question the group think. It's actually ok not to question it. I won't belittle you if you do.

 

[king_sirro]

You're right- I'll downplay it because that isn't what I've said.

If we are simply only talking about results on the field- there is no argument. But I've not argued that once.

I've also never said HBG don't make mistakes. Because it seems pretty obvious they have.

What is it you want me to commit to?

I don't think they are as bad as people want to make them out to be. I think they are a necessary evil until there is a better option. In fact I think they should be encouraged to continue, instead of removed. But in a format where they are not 90% owners of the club.

I think people are happy to overlook the only quotable remarks around the recent board moves because 'we don't trust them' instead of trying to dig deeper into the why of it.

I think people have convinced themselves of a 'truth' regarding the meeting between PVL & HBG because it fits what they want to believe.

When I've said "We don't know" what I really mean is- we don't know. But, there are a few louder voices who believe they do. Based off assumptions.

It's ok to question the group think. It's actually ok not to question it. I won't belittle you if you do.

This is the thing though, you mention the only quotable remarks are by HBG so we should take them as face value. But you fail to recognise those remarks have since been removed, the moves they made revoked, and not a single word from them. How you see that as defendable is beyond me.

 

[The Chad]

This is the thing though, you mention the only quotable remarks are by HBG so we should take them as face value. But you fail to recognise those remarks have since been removed, the moves they made revoked, and not a single word from them. How you see that as defendable is beyond me.

Until we hear differently, those remarks are really all there is to go on.